Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate GOP set to go 'nuclear' over judges
Cox news service via the Times Argus ^ | 11/28/04 | Chuck Lindell

Posted on 11/28/2004 2:36:14 PM PST by NeoCaveman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: Bommer

See #42. Before it was 51 w/ RINO's now it's 55 w/ RINO's.


61 posted on 11/28/2004 3:50:43 PM PST by NeoCaveman (http://route-82.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I'll celebrate this in the past tense only. I'll believe it when Brit smacks Juan in the face with it.

I'm afraid we'll be waiting a looong time for that to happen. The Pubbie Senators don't have the intestinal fortitude to play hardball with the bad boy Democrats. I fully expect Bush to eventually appoint a bunch of milquetoast "moderates" to the federal bench because his Senate pals are too sissified to do what it would take to overpower the Dem obstructionists.

OTOH, even if Frist and the other Pub Senate leaders somehow grow a pair, there are at least 4, and probably more, RINO Senators who will vote with the Dems rather than allow strict constructionist judges and/or Justices to be confirmed. I'm thinking of Snowe, Collins, Chaffee, and Hagel, and possibly McCain. And I still think Specter will double cross Bush when push comes to shove. Once he has the Judiciary committee chair he will be almost impossible to unseat.

When the deal was struck to allow Specter to take his chairmanship I said then I would never vote for a Repub again after 44 years of voting for and then being shafted by RINOs and Pubbie cowards. If they manage to somehow pull off this "nuclear option" maneuver I will take that vow back. But I'm not holding my breath, I don't have 2 cents worth of confidence in the whole 55 member bunch.

62 posted on 11/28/2004 3:51:06 PM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
"As John McCain (R-Ariz.) has already pointed out, someday the Republicans will be in the minority again, and they wouldn't be too happy if Democrats exercised the nuclear option on them."

C'mon, John -- they'd never do anything like that!

63 posted on 11/28/2004 3:52:48 PM PST by fat city (Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Getting 50 votes could still be tough. Our RINOs -- Chafee, Snowe, Collins, McCain, Hagel, Lugar and Specter could still get together and torpedo this if they want to.

So, I am glad to hear that it looks like Arlen is on board. If he truly is, then this would definitely pass the Senate, and would ensure our conservative judges get confirmed.

64 posted on 11/28/2004 3:54:06 PM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
So, I am glad to hear that it looks like Arlen is on board

Arlen is and has always been on board with nobody but himself. He will do what ever is in his best interest.

As I have said before, he is Lucy with the football.

65 posted on 11/28/2004 3:57:31 PM PST by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

It is the Democrats who are being nuclear about this.

Bill Frist should state at the start of the new Senate:

Our Senate has a rich history that includes both written rules and unwritten traditions regarding those rules. The filibuster is one item that has such written rules and unwritten traditions.

Until now, it has been an unwritten tradition that the minority party never used the filibuster rule to block the confirmation of a judicial appointment when the votes to confirm were present on the floor.

Since the current minority party has elected to ignore this unwritten tradition repeatedly, we have no choice but to write this unwritten tradition into the rules of the Senate to prevent such abuse in the future.

Henceforth, we are adding to the written filibuster rule what has always been the practice until very recently -- the filibuster cannot be used to block a vote on confirmation of a Judicial appointment.

Some have called this the "nuclear" solution but it is really the minority party, previously headed by the obstructionist leadership, who has "nuked" 200 years of tradition. We are merely stopping their attack, kind of like Judicial SDI.




66 posted on 11/28/2004 4:06:06 PM PST by RobFromGa (End the Filibuster for Judicial appointments in January 05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; devolve
Either way, it would be pure power politics, leaving Democrats unable to respond. Other Senate rules, however, would give the minority party plenty of opportunity to express its anger in the months, and years, to follow.

The Senate operates on "unanimous consent," meaning that nothing moves forward without approval of all 100 senators, except when party leaders negotiate specific agreements. In effect, each senator has the power to halt or delay movement on bills, resolutions and nominees.

"You'll get Democrats denying unanimous consent on a great number of things," Ornstein said. "They'll pick and choose those places, so there's a price to be paid."

Republicans said they think that voters would turn against Democrats as obstructionist, but those concerned with the breakdown of comity in Congress are watching the unfolding drama with trepidation.

"The use of the nuclear option would make history, and not very happy history," Pitney said. "As John McCain (R-Ariz.) has already pointed out, someday the Republicans will be in the minority again, and they wouldn't be too happy if Democrats exercised the nuclear option on them."


I am so sick of them obstructing Bush's judicial picks.

And this article seems to put the monkey on the GOP's back. The author seems to think filibustering by DemoKrauts is okay, while going by the Senate practice of using floor votes just Gawd Awful or something. They refer to the 'RAT tactic of filibustering judicial nominees as "long-cherished", while noting the Republicans are "loaded for bear" trying to stop the 'RATS obstruction.


But the Republican threat to neuter long-cherished filibuster rules by steamrolling Democrats is risky — so potentially destructive that Capitol Hill calls it the "nuclear option." Democratic retaliation would be swift and long-lasting, raising the prospect of escalating clashes in a body that prides itself on gentility and cool judgment.

Even so, Republican leaders are signaling their intent to go nuclear in word and deed.

"We're going to use every tool we possibly can," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who also unveiled a kinder, gentler phrase for the potential rules change: the "constitutional option."

"Republicans are loaded for bear, spoiling for a confrontation with Senate Democrats on judicial appointments," said Norm Ornstein, an expert on Congress for the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute. "For a lot of conservatives, this has really become an issue that leaves them passionate."


67 posted on 11/28/2004 4:10:11 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP! ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Contact your current
senators and representatives
and right wing media
and find out why Hanoi Kerry still is in the US Senate.
Demand that this traitor is removed from the US Senate now!

There is no need to impeach him.

He's in violation of the
US Constitution 14th Amendment Section 3
and violation of 18 USC 953
- Private correspondence with foreign governments
and UCMJ Section 904. ART. 104.
- Aiding the Enemy.

Don't be like the silent majority in the 60's and 70's
and turn your back on America and cave in to the anti war minority.
Speak up for America today!

Distribute these url's!

EXPOSE HANOI KERRY!

Full details on these url's!

http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html

There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.

http://stophanoikerry.150m.com

Timeline of Hanoi Kerry

http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html


68 posted on 11/28/2004 4:15:13 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Why do 99 US Senators allow a traitor in their midst? Why is right wing media silent?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Thank you for posting an unnecessarily excerpted article.
69 posted on 11/28/2004 4:20:53 PM PST by upchuck (My "just in time" supply chain for taglines is busted. Come back tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Democratic retaliation would be swift and long-lasting, raising the prospect of escalating clashes in a body that prides itself on gentility and cool judgment.

The reason why so many things are screwed up in America is because of the Senate's "gentility".

One word that they should use the "nuclear option" on is "bipartisanship".

The best thing for our nation would be to have an all out continual war in the Senate and House since that is the only way you can uphold conservative principles when you are combatting these screwball leftists in the Democratic Party. There is no way you can have "bipartisanship" with the RATs considering how radical and extremist they are.

70 posted on 11/28/2004 4:21:05 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Thank you for posting an unnecessarily excerpted article.

Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa

71 posted on 11/28/2004 4:32:26 PM PST by NeoCaveman (http://route-82.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TUX

"Pubbies", is it? Your very old office humor joke goes like this, and it has nothing to do with politics:

Getting anything done around here is like mating elephants.

1. It can be done only at a high level.

2. It's accomplished with a great deal of roaring and screaming.

3. It takes two years to achieve any results.


Nice try, "demmie"


72 posted on 11/28/2004 4:36:34 PM PST by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
A lot of you malcontents condemned and criticized Bush and Frist for not doing more to push judicial picks during the last or two. I believe they knew that being patient was the best option, being confidant that they would pick up at least 3 seats and maybe more, and THEN IT WOULD BE TIME TO PLAY HARDBALL. Straterergy wins, not impetulent huffing and puffing like some two year old.
73 posted on 11/28/2004 4:37:38 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You know, I'm not scared about Democrat "retaliation

Amen! We got nothing but grief and backstabbing from those scum the first term anyway when playing "new tone".

74 posted on 11/28/2004 4:39:39 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
A lot of you malcontents condemned and criticized Bush and Frist for not doing more to push judicial picks during the last or two. I believe they knew that being patient was the best option, being confidant that they would pick up at least 3 seats and maybe more, and THEN IT WOULD BE TIME TO PLAY HARDBALL. Straterergy wins, not impetulent huffing and puffing like some two year old.

There haven't been the votes to do anything drastic in this Congress, but that didn't stop the malcontents whining about Frist. We've got the votes in the next Congress beginning at High Noon on January 3. Now, Frist has a fair chance to succeed.

75 posted on 11/28/2004 4:43:06 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
The lousy swines have left us no choice. The dem obstructionists know full that they are in the wrong, but they don't care. They'll do anything to get their way, and it's high time to put an end to this BS.
76 posted on 11/28/2004 4:43:46 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Recess appointments expire at the end of any Congressional session. So any such appointments may be useful in the short term, but they are certainly no substitute for the normal lifetime appointments that come as the result of Senate confirmation.

And since the current session expires at Noon on January 3, we're talking about the very short term.

77 posted on 11/28/2004 4:46:20 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

I'll pass the U-238 so we can get this done!


78 posted on 11/28/2004 4:49:50 PM PST by TMSuchman (American by birth,rebel by choice, MARINE BY GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Just don't let it happen again :)


79 posted on 11/28/2004 5:01:08 PM PST by upchuck (My "just in time" supply chain for taglines is busted. Come back tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Wake me up when they actually do it.


80 posted on 11/28/2004 5:26:01 PM PST by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson