Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Austin Willard Wright
Here's what I said:

"The reason that U of M won the case is because it wasn't affirmative action at all. There were no numerical quotas, and their purpose of the diversity being sought was not "to remedy the cumulative effect of subtle as well as gross expressions of prejudice", but rather to enhance the collegiate ambiance."

Interesting...U of M had no quotas, I said that, but you claim that I said that it would be wrong for SCOTUS to allow quotas.

Making things up I see.

153 posted on 11/28/2004 4:12:52 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
Boy, you're a surly one, aren't you? I said I could have misunderstood you.

Do you or don't you believe SCOTUS was wrong when it struck down the point system? Your idiotic and lying friend.

155 posted on 11/28/2004 4:18:35 PM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez

As to whether Michigan had quotas, it did via the point system.


156 posted on 11/28/2004 4:20:45 PM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson