"The reason that U of M won the case is because it wasn't affirmative action at all. There were no numerical quotas, and their purpose of the diversity being sought was not "to remedy the cumulative effect of subtle as well as gross expressions of prejudice", but rather to enhance the collegiate ambiance."
Interesting...U of M had no quotas, I said that, but you claim that I said that it would be wrong for SCOTUS to allow quotas.
Making things up I see.
Do you or don't you believe SCOTUS was wrong when it struck down the point system? Your idiotic and lying friend.
As to whether Michigan had quotas, it did via the point system.