Posted on 11/27/2004 9:49:36 PM PST by Sarah
A Dollar Warning America can't devalue its way to prosperity. Sunday, November 28, 2004 12:01 a.m. EST President Bush has let everyone know he intends to pursue an ambitious second-term agenda. But if he wants to know what could spoil his plans even before his second Inaugural, he might consider the market reaction to his Administration's weak dollar complacency.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
It comes back as handles on your hammers. I know that much for sure.
When the Fed calculates inflation, they take out everything that is variable: fuel, oil, food, etc. The claim is that it is to unpredictable to calculate, thus there is the claim of only 1% inflation, hahahahaha.
You want to save America? 2 things: 1. balanced budgets from our kleptomaniacs in Congress. 2. get rid of Roosovelt's Banking Reform laws that guarenteed to back the banks with Tax Payer funds. That should put a quick break on run away credit card issuing, which will cut down on debt spending.
Iraq may be part of it, but the hurricaine season has had some effect on building materials prices, too.
Hah, in 1916 Woodrow Wilson said "My God, what have I done. I have doomed this republic by putting all the power in the hands of only a few men." This was in reference to the Bank Reform laws he signed in 1913.
We've been selling a lot of those raw mat'ls (it's been amazing to watch concrete prices!) to China, because China is on a frenzy of public works projects. I really don't know much about all this stuff, am no economist but like to read about it, but everything on your list is "raw" stuff.
bttt for later read
One hopes that current incremental devaluation policies may forestall a sudden drop in dollar values. Extreme and sudden unemployment is much in the Democrat Party's interest so long as George W. Bush can be blamed.
Holy crap, we'd have a run on the banks (or ATMs, which ever)!
Very simple, really. Examine the velocity of M3 calculated in reference to GDP at economagic.com. You have to be familiar with the M3 time series first, of course. Notice the inflection points in 1993.
What you are seeing is a flood of dollars, a huge increase in "liquidity". Massive increase in quantity supplied leads to lowered price. You are also seeing the cause of the market blowoff and crash of 2000. Lots of other things as well.
Dimensional lumber mostly comes from Canada these days, although some (Yellow Pine) comes from the Southeastern U.S..
Kitchen cabinets are mostly made in Canada, I think...at least the doors are.
I'm not sure where most of our steel comes from, but:
Washington, D.C. - Based on preliminary Census Bureau data, the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) reported today that the United States imported a total of 3,467,000 net tons (NT) of steel in September, including 2,714,000 NT of finished steel. Imports in both categories over the past two months have been the highest levels in four years and, year-to-date (YTD), are up 47 percent compared to the same period last year. The 47 percent gain in finished steel imports is nearly three times the 16.3 percent gain in steel consumption. As a result, steel import penetration in the United States in this period has jumped from 16 to 20 percent.
Almost 100% of electrical devices used in homes today are made elsewhere. Plumbing fixtures too. Even 500# Kohler cast-iron bathtubs are made in China and shipped over here.
Are you saying that more dollars lowers prices? If so, I would tend to think you're wrong. More dollars chasing goods equals inflation.
M3 time series (sorry to not leave links earlier):
http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/charter.exe/fedstl/m3sl
M3 velocity time series:
http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/charter.exe/var/vel-gdp-per-m3
There are good arguments that the Urban Consumer Price Index has been largely bogus since at least LBJ's time. The Producer Price Index is a more accurate inflation index, seems to me.
I agree. And also believe a bust in housing market is somewhat inevitable. This, along with its long term economic consequences will annoy many people.
"They're too busy arguing over what Greenspan's latest fart smelled like."
Why argue over something that Andrea Mitchell is an expert at or should I say "connoisseur"?
Your lumber and steel is due to giant sucking sound of Big Red China gulping up all the raw commodities...
Good talking to you. Here's another scenario, though. The banks, unwilling to repo the homes, would go into massive "work-out" mode similar to what they did with South American debt. People get to stay in their homes and the banks keep the loans on the books as "performing." Of course, there will be a certain percentage of people who object to paying $500,000 for a piece of property and building only worth $150,000, but I believe that percentage will be relatively small.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.