Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re

The goal-keeper is most at risk for running into a post, or getting kicked in the head. I've seen both. I support any keeper who wants to protect his/her head.

Our daughter plays and we worry about her as she gets older and the game gets more physical. We would never allow her to play goal--too dangerous. Outside of goal, the main risk is ACL injury. In addition to high-speed headers, there are plenty of elbows to the head as well as the dreaded head-to-head collision. Head-gear? By all means.


9 posted on 11/27/2004 11:25:26 AM PST by hemi dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: hemi dawg; turnrightnow
I have no problem with padding the keepers more than they are. Playing goal is going to be somewhat more dangerous than other positions, particularly for aggressive players, but the problem with aggressive players is that if you pad them like football players, they're going to play like football players. It's really incumbent on referees to do an adequate job of protecting the keeper as well, or else it'll turn into a damn rugby scrum every time the ball crosses the penalty arc.

The other thing I've seen from time to time is that sometimes you'll get leagues who have one-size-fits-all goalposts to try accomodating all ages, where the goalposts split the difference between youth and adult players, which causes the goal to be too small for older players. For players 12 and up, the goal really should be FIFA standard-regulation 8 feet high by 24 feet wide - anything less is just asking for trouble.

22 posted on 11/27/2004 11:40:11 AM PST by general_re (Drive offensively - the life you save may be your own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson