[FairOpinion]

Half of them voted for one candidate, half for the other.

Some people keep talking, as if 80% voted for Yushchenko, and Putin would be forcing the other guy on them.

It was a close election, actualy Yanukovich won 3% more of the vote. There were irregularities -- MAYBE.

The objective is to have a legal, fair election, NOT TO FORCE the RU's and Soros's candidate on the Ukrainian people.

[FairOpinion]

I meant not to force EU's candidate on the Ukrainian people.

[cicero's_son]

It was a close election, actualy Yanukovich won 3% more of the vote. There were irregularities -- MAYBE

LOL! Oh, come on...you had to be laughing when you wrote that, right?

[Johnnyboy2000]

Results in rigged elections are usually not good evidence to make an argument. Sadaam Hussein got 100% of the vote in Iraq's last national election. Do you have any evidence that Soros was funding a candidate in the Ukrainian elections, or did you just make that up? The 2000 election was a close election, and I don't remember masses of people threatening a general strike. This election looks like a sham. Listen to what the Bush Administration is saying about this election.