[MoralSense]

There is actually a law severely restricting any business's right to determine who solicits and who doesn't on its premises. As a result, unions can organize without permission and under federal protection if Target or Wal-Mart allow any solicitations on their grounds. Blame the federal government's meddling here, not Target.

[Atlantic Friend]

It really makes no sense. This "equalitarianism" is totally out of hand. It's amazing your federal judges don't get chased down more often by angry multitudes !

[Bogey]

There is actually a law severely restricting any business's right to determine who solicits and who doesn't on its premises. As a result, unions can organize without permission and under federal protection if Target or Wal-Mart allow any solicitations on their grounds. Blame the federal government's meddling here, not Target.

---

I was going to offer a similar opinion. I took the opportunity yesterday to thank the manager of the Publix I
shop at, for allowing the SA to put their kettle out.
He told me while they truly supported the organization, sadly, the chain will have numerous threats of lawsuits from every group under the sun, to have the same right.
Another reason for tort reform. I can't say I blame Target.
It's probably more constructive to save the litigation cost and just contribute to the organization.