To: NZerFromHK
In 11 US states where voters had the opportunity to consider constitutional amendments defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman, they supported it in even greater numbers than they did President Bush, to whom the 11 also gave a majority. Actually MI and OR voted for constitutional amenedments defining marriage as being between one man and one woman while voting for Kerry.
To: Paleo Conservative; alwaysconservative
I personally think the author probably meant: voters in these states voted for gay marriage bans, while not a few of those who support the ban also voted for Kerry i.e. you can't say Bush won entirely because of the "upport the gay marriage ban" Christians.
29 posted on
11/23/2004 3:08:51 PM PST by
NZerFromHK
(Disclaimer: this poster is a naturalized NZer born in Hong Kong, not a expat Kiwi in HK)
To: Paleo Conservative; alwaysconservative
Never mind. The author made a mistake there, but it actually amplified his point rather than subtracted.
30 posted on
11/23/2004 3:13:58 PM PST by
NZerFromHK
(Disclaimer: this poster is a naturalized NZer born in Hong Kong, not a expat Kiwi in HK)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson