Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUNKER-BUSTER WIPED OUT
Defence Tech. ^

Posted on 11/23/2004 10:56:06 AM PST by Not a 60s Hippy

-->

Republican representative – Ohio's David Hobson, who chairs the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee – moved to wipe out funds for the program entirely.

(Excerpt) Read more at defensetech.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bunker; bunkerbuster; buster; out
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2004 10:56:07 AM PST by Not a 60s Hippy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy
Looks to me like he's using this as a bargaining chip in his personal crusade to reduce the size of the nation's stockpile. It got reinstated last time around.
2 posted on 11/23/2004 10:59:38 AM PST by FredZarguna (Free markets. Free Speech. Free Minds. But no Free Lunch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

Hobson is an ignorant ass. The reason these projectiles are being designed is because there are bunkers -- in Iran and North Korea, for example -- that our conventional weapons can't reach. If we are denied deep penetrators, nukes will be the only arrow in our quiver when the time comes. Hope that choice meets with Congressman Bozo's approval.


3 posted on 11/23/2004 11:00:42 AM PST by GOP Jedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy
The Armed Service Committee must be laughing right about now.....Bunker Buster are here to stay, and if they stop making them it's only because the mini-nuke ones are up and coming.
4 posted on 11/23/2004 11:01:08 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

Someone explain to me how a Water/Energy guy can strike out language for the bunker busters...is this in a defense appropriations bill? I thought that was already passed.


5 posted on 11/23/2004 11:01:34 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

this one is the mini-nuke.


6 posted on 11/23/2004 11:03:51 AM PST by Haro_546 (Christian Zionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy
BUNKER-BUSTER WIPED OUT

Add an "h" and an extra "p" to wiped and the headline becomes true. Words are cool.

7 posted on 11/23/2004 11:04:01 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

Yankee Whiskey Bravo Tango Sierra.


8 posted on 11/23/2004 11:04:24 AM PST by hchutch (A pro-artificial turf, pro-designated hitter baseball fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
NEW NUKE RESEARCH BLOWN UP?

It ain't dead, yet. But the Bush administration's push to research and develop new nuclear weapons could be on the verge of flat-lining, after a key Congressional leader moved on Wednesday to eliminate funding for the atomic arms projects.

Ohio Republican Rep. David Hobson, who chairs the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, wiped out $96 million in nuclear projects from the government's budget for next year -- including funds for researching nuclear "bunker-buster" bombs and low-yield, "mini-nuke" weapons. Hobson also snapped the purse strings of projects to build thousands more plutonium hearts for nuclear weapons and to fast-track atomic testing.

Just last week, the Department of Energy submitted a plan to pare thousands of weapons from America's existing nuclear arsenal. But, despite the proposal, much of the country's nuclear arms budget is still at "Cold War" levels, Hobson complained in a statement. The Energy Department "needs to take a 'time-out' on new initiatives until it completes a review of its weapons complex in relation to security needs, budget constraints and this new stockpile plan."

Anti-nuclear activists were giddy after Hobson's stand. Two weeks ago, the full House of Representatives narrowly defeated an amendment to take away the money for researching the "Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator" -- a weapon designed to burrow deep into the ground before unleashing a nuclear hell-storm in underground bunkers. Taken together, activists said they believe the maneuvers forecast a gloomy future for a new atomic arsenal.

9 posted on 11/23/2004 11:04:31 AM PST by b4its2late (Liberals are good examples of why some animals eat their young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Someone explain to me how a Water/Energy guy can strike out language for the bunker busters...is this in a defense appropriations bill?

Nuclear (or nuke-u-leer) weapons R&D is performed by the Department of Energy.

10 posted on 11/23/2004 11:05:27 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Most of the nation's nuclear materials (including weapons grade) and their creation come under the authority of the Dept of Energy (DOE), not DoD, so the Water/Energy chairman could well strike out the DOE appropriations.


11 posted on 11/23/2004 11:06:08 AM PST by ExpandNATO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

[Natalie Maines] Just so you know, we're ashamed David Hobson is from Ohio. [/Natalie Maines]


12 posted on 11/23/2004 11:10:37 AM PST by Dan Middleton (Hang on sloopy / Sloop hang on / Hang on Sloopy / Sloopy Hang on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExpandNATO

Yeah, but who's responsible for beeber-stuning research? (c8


13 posted on 11/23/2004 11:11:24 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

IDIOT!
14 posted on 11/23/2004 11:12:33 AM PST by PhotoFixer3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Excuse me while I whip this out! Blazing Saddles revisited.


15 posted on 11/23/2004 11:17:16 AM PST by eastforker (Maybe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure what I said is what I meant_John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

IMO - It's projects like this that need to be in the "Black Budget".


16 posted on 11/23/2004 11:18:45 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

Recall, impeach,discredit.


17 posted on 11/23/2004 11:24:41 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExpandNATO

THANKS. I did not know that. This guy is hurting our defense. I hope his efforts fail.


18 posted on 11/23/2004 11:26:02 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

Yeah thats smart, Cut weapons programs while we are at war? Not only that, but the very weapons that we may NEED to defeat a present eniemy.

One word---STUPID!


19 posted on 11/23/2004 11:26:54 AM PST by southernerwithanattitude (new and improved redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not a 60s Hippy

The alternative to using smaller penetrator nukes to get at these bunkers is to attack them with surface blasts from far larger nukes. This doesn't make sense from the perspective of reducing civilian casualties from any military action to a minimum. I'm not particularly happy about the worldwide nuclear fallout, either.

This moron needs to be called on the carpet. Doesn't he understand that the mere threat of using such a weapon will bring rogue regimes to heal? Right now the Iranians and NKs think that they're safe because we won't invade and we won't use big nukes to knock out their nuke programs - and they're probably right. We need more arrows in our quiver, and a mere Congressman shouldn't stand in the way. Maybe Bush should veto any bill that provides money to his district....


20 posted on 11/23/2004 2:17:28 PM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson