Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex offender says he's a good dad
Pioneer Press ^ | 11-22-04 | SHANNON PRATHER

Posted on 11/22/2004 6:39:10 PM PST by Rakkasan1

Convicted sex offender Justin Farnsworth said he petitioned for custody of his two daughters and his girlfriend's daughter because he loved his kids and could provide the best home for them.

But the Hastings man, who had been convicted of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old in 1994 and underwent sexual offender treatment, now admits he struggled to control the bad impulses and thoughts he had about his girlfriend's 9-year-old daughter.

Dakota County Judge Joseph T. Carter awarded Farnsworth, 31, primary custody of his two daughters in May and his girlfriend's child in October after a court-appointed evaluator said it would be in the best interests of the children. The mother, who had been investigated by Child Protection Services, agreed to the arrangement.

(Excerpt) Read more at twincities.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dad; judge; judicialactivism; offender; sex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
this title made me laugh. Surrrrre you are.
1 posted on 11/22/2004 6:39:10 PM PST by Rakkasan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Uh-huh. Really?


2 posted on 11/22/2004 6:43:59 PM PST by Ptarmigan (Proud rabbit hater and killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

No way. That defys all logic. More children will be destroyed when he experiences a slight relapse.


3 posted on 11/22/2004 6:46:40 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
The mother, who had been investigated by Child Protection Services, agreed to the arrangement.

Looks like the judge had to weigh the lesser of two evils.

4 posted on 11/22/2004 6:46:40 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
Looks like the judge had to weigh the lesser of two evils.

Except there are more than two options open here.

5 posted on 11/22/2004 6:49:57 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Shotgun or a cutlass came to my head


6 posted on 11/22/2004 6:51:01 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: randog

I don't think so! What about the foster-parents choice #3!


7 posted on 11/22/2004 6:51:20 PM PST by luvie (WE DID NOT WAVER; WE DID NOT TIRE; WE DID NOT FALTER; AND WE DID NOT FAIL!! GWB ROCKS!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

He has a new occupation all ready for him. He can advertise it as follows:

"babysitter available for liberal, open minded, tolerant and understanding parents who believe in giving everyone a second chance."

Think he'll get any clients?


8 posted on 11/22/2004 6:53:11 PM PST by RtWngr (Being tolerant of the intolerant is pretty stupid actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

3 evils?


9 posted on 11/22/2004 6:53:20 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

This is some horrible story, but what I really wanted to say is: YOUR TAGLINE ROCKS!!!!!!!!!


10 posted on 11/22/2004 6:54:54 PM PST by jocon307 (Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Blue state "family values". The judge that granted custody should be arrested.


11 posted on 11/22/2004 6:55:06 PM PST by MisterRepublican ("I must go. I must be elusive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Thanks!


12 posted on 11/22/2004 6:57:19 PM PST by luvie (WE DID NOT WAVER; WE DID NOT TIRE; WE DID NOT FALTER; AND WE DID NOT FAIL!! GWB ROCKS!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

excuse our state.
I live in a red county.


13 posted on 11/22/2004 7:00:04 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece: Hope IS on the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

The former(?) child molester is found by the court to be a better parent? Just how f---ed up is the mom???


14 posted on 11/22/2004 7:00:53 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Anyone who believes this man should have his head examined.


15 posted on 11/22/2004 7:01:05 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
Un-f'n-believable.

More from WCCO here

Judge Criticized For Giving Custody Of Girl To Convicted Sex Offender

Nov 20, 2004 1:29 pm US/Central
Hastings, Minn. (AP) A court-appointed evaluator who recommended that a convicted sex offender get custody of his girlfriend's daughter said he now wishes a judge had appointed an advocate to speak on the child's behalf.

Attorney David Jaehne said Thursday he spoke with the girl and visited the home before recommending she permanently live with Justin Farnsworth, 31, of Hastings.

"I always talk to the kids. I always go to the home. I interview neighbors," Jaehne told the St. Paul Pioneer Press for a Friday story.

Jaehne filed his report with Dakota County District Judge Joseph T. Carter, who last month awarded custody to Farnsworth without appointing an advocate for the child, known as a guardian ad litem.

On Wednesday, Farnsworth was charged with three counts of felony sexual misconduct involving the girl. He was jailed on $300,000 bond.

A number of people expressed outrage at the situation Thursday, and some attorneys who represent children questioned why Carter did not appoint an advocate for the girl.

But the Minnesota State Bar Association defended the judge, who has said judicial ethics preclude him from commenting.

"Given Farnsworth's reported admission of guilt, it is easy to see that he should not have been given custody of the young girl he is charged with sexually molesting," Bar Association President David Stowman said in a statement.

"Ideally, Farnsworth wouldn't have had any contact with the girl," he continued. "However, Judge Carter wasn't dealing with the ideal; he was dealing with the reality of a little girl who didn't have a responsible parent to care for her."

Farnsworth received custody of three girls under age 10 -- two of his own daughters in addition to his girlfriend's daughter. He had been registered as a sex offender after being convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl in 1994.

The girlfriend, who is the mother of all three children, repeatedly "abandoned" the children in Farnsworth's care, according to court files.

All three girls are now staying with their mother, police said.

Jaehne, who essentially investigated the custody request for the judge, said he knew about Farnsworth's previous felony sexual offense. Farnsworth spent six months in jail and 10 years on probation.

"You get two choices in a custody evaluation. In this case, only one parent was asking for the kids to live with him," Jaehne said.

Gail Chang Bohr, executive director of the Children's Law Center of Minnesota, said a guardian ad litem likely would have done his or her own independent investigation.

"You need to get the kids' voices in there somehow," she said.

Bohr said it's easy to criticize the judge, but that this case is just one example of a system plagued with troubled families, neglected and abused children and tough decisions.

"Over and over, in child protection, these things happen. As a community, we should always be concerned," Bohr said. "I am pretty sure in hindsight (the judge) would have done it differently if he had all the information. I am not sure he did."

It's not clear what other options the judge might have had, but according to Jaehne's report, Farnsworth's girlfriend had an older child living with her parents.

Minnesota law requires judges to appoint guardians ad litem for children involved in protection cases where there is alleged domestic violence, child abuse or neglect. Judges can also choose to appoint them in difficult custody cases. Guardians ad litem represented 12,500 children in Minnesota last year.

"We really are the eyes and ears for the court to investigate child welfare matters and to report back what we've found, and sometimes recommend in the child's best interest in terms of custody and contact," said Mark Toogood, state program manager for guardians ad litem.

"We are careful not to second-guess the judicial determination of cases because we don't have all the facts," he added.

Dakota County prosecutor Scott Hersey put the blame on Farnsworth.

"In my view, the situation in this case is unconscionable -- the fact that he is sexually abusing the victim and going into court to get custody to enable his ongoing sexual abuse of that child," Hersey said.
16 posted on 11/22/2004 7:02:04 PM PST by BJClinton (Honk if you love peace and quiet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

That's right, there are options. What the heck has happened to American families these days? Why wouldn't grandparents or aunts/uncles be getting involved in situations like this?

A few weeks ago, I was at a methaphetamine community awareness meeting. During the Q&A period, more than one person said something like: "My daughter uses meth. The kids are at risk. I called the police and I called Child Protective Services and they haven't done anything. I'm worried about those children. What can I do to get them out of there?"

After the Dep't of Health representativeand the Police officer hemmed and hawed, I stood up and offered a politically incorrect alternative:

"Why in the world are you standing here talking about it? If it were my grandkids or my nieces or nephews in danger, I wouldn't think twice. You need to go over and take those kids and let them live in a safe, drug-free, loving home--your home. You don't leave them in a home with a drug dealing bad mother! Who cares if you don't have legal custody? You're the grandmother and you love them. That's good enough for me. Let your daughter call the cops."


17 posted on 11/22/2004 7:03:33 PM PST by Choose Ye This Day (DUmmies: You keep visualizing a Kerry win...we'll lead the world and beat the terrorists. Mmmmkay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Me too. McLeod County, 7th District. We're trying to make up for the Twin Cities.


18 posted on 11/22/2004 7:04:47 PM PST by Choose Ye This Day (DUmmies: You keep visualizing a Kerry win...we'll lead the world and beat the terrorists. Mmmmkay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton
"judicial ethics"
19 posted on 11/22/2004 7:41:10 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece: Hope IS on the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
now admits he struggled to control the bad impulses and thoughts he had about his girlfriend's 9-year-old daughter. Dakota County Judge Joseph T. Carter awarded Farnsworth, 31, primary custody of his two daughters in May and his girlfriend's child in October

SAY WHAT????

20 posted on 11/22/2004 8:11:59 PM PST by GeronL ([[[[[[[[[[[This tagline closed until further notice- Homeland Security Dept-]]]]]]]]]]]]]])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson