No offense intended.....
Posted on 11/22/2004 10:18:49 AM PST by beyond the sea
Scott Peterson's attorney chose the wrong defense. I guess killing one's spouse to protect a pet is de rigour.
PS I forgot the sarcasm tag on my last post to you.
Mee top, on the previous one!
I guess republican4ever thinks insulting hunters by saying they have no regard for life is a kind word. I would say those who condone killing a man for pushing you (if thats even true) or threatening your dog has no regard for life.
LOL... can't type here!
Oh my...I haven't seen that since I was a little kid growing up in Wisconsin.
Actually, in that case, she wouldn't have needed the cistern. Just toss the body in the pen. Presto! No evidence.
Did somebody leave the door open and let a bunch of tree huggers in here? This thread is the most LIBERAL, wanker-populated thing I've seen on FR to date. For crying out loud, all you damn animal worshippers are putting Fifi above a human being???
You try to justify it by hoping he made other threats against her and that he's 'probably' a serial killer wannabe??
Holy...
It's just speculation. You may want to calm down and get off your judgemental perch.
Personally, Im 58 years old, and in all my years nearly every person (thank God there were only a few) I knew who threatened to kill pets or killed pets deserved to be good and dead themselves!
Just an observance.
None required on your part. I just didn't want you to get the impression that your grave insult was lost on me, you useless liberal dog (dog probably being a complement in your eyes)
As it was noted before, some of us think there was more that a mere first time threat here against the woman... maybe not. But, if the man indeed threatened her, should she have waited until he actually tried to kill her?
As for my opinion on hunting, I clarified it earlier.
I'm with you on this one. I know I'll get flamed, but no way is this murder justified.
And I'm a pet owner and animal lover! (Check my profile page for my cat's pic).
Oh gosh, that is so sad....I don't blame you not being able to pull her out.
You are assuming it was murder. You know what they say about "assuming".
I love it too--- "Sometimes being a b!tch is all a woman has to hold on to."
Because you have only been here just over a month (unless you are a previouslly banned poster), I'll tell you this: many FReepers have pets. Many FReepers regard their pets as family members. FReepers aren't PETA activists. But those that are trying to live up to the liberal stereotype of conservatives like to call them that.
Why does everyone assume she is telling the truth. She's an admitted murderer, why not a liar? Maybe she spent the last six days coming up with a PC story she thought would be a good defense.
No offense intended.....
Typically, hunters are true appreciators of wildlife...one of the reasons we go hunting is to give us an excuse to get out into the wild...in fact, we are normally more aware of the equation between food and life than most people...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.