Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN knew of Saddam's oil-for-food thefts: BBC
Theage.com ^ | November 22, 2004 | Caroline Overington

Posted on 11/21/2004 9:55:29 AM PST by Ginifer

The United Nations knew that Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was stealing from the oil-for-food program - and, by extension, starving his own people - but did little to stop it, according to a special report by the BBC at the weekend.

After a six-month investigation, the BBC said it had evidence that Saddam took billions from the oil-for-food program, and that "these abuses were widely known about at the time". The BBC said there was evidence that Saddam demanded a kickback from companies that wanted to do business with Iraq under the oil-for-food program.

Australia sold wheat worth about $A1 billion to Iraq under the program but the Australian Wheat Board strongly denies wrongdoing. However, US congressman Chris Shays told the BBC that Saddam "didn't participate with you if he couldn't get kickbacks.

"He didn't buy commodities unless he got kickbacks so, if you agreed to participate, you agreed to do it on his terms. And we know what those terms were."

The Age reported last year that Australia sold wheat to Iraq at what appears to be an inflated price.

The wheat board says it never gave a cut of its contracts to Saddam. It was forced to pay a Jordanian trucking company to move its wheat around Iraq. That trucking company was selected by Saddam.

The BBC sent a reporter to Iraq and Jordan to track down people involved in the oil-for-food program, which has been described as the largest financial swindle in history. Virtually all said that Saddam took kickbacks from companies who sold goods to Iraq, and that the UN knew this. The businessmen - most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity - said it was standard to pay commissions, that nobody complained, and that was the price of doing business with Iraq.

A Jordanian banker said it was an open secret that contracts were inflated so Saddam could take 10 per cent. "We knew it was there," he said. "(But) actually, it's not our business, you know. Banks are (only) interested in their money, and to make money."

The allegations have left the UN fighting for its reputation. The oil-for-food program is being investigated by six US congressional committees and by the UN itself.

Many UN officials believe the US is trying to divert media attention towards the oil-for-food program as a way of punishing the UN for failing to back the war in Iraq.

Others believe the US is using the investigations as a way of distracting attention from the war. Mr Shay said: "Well, the UN is sure making it easy (to attack)."

The oil-for-food program ran from 1997 to 2003. It was supposed to allow Saddam to sell oil, provided he used the money only to buy food and medicine.

Since the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, evidence has emerged that Saddam found many ways to skim billions from the program. Some of that money allegedly went to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. It is also alleged that Saddam paid foreign journalists and sympathetic foreign officials, as a way of getting them to campaign to get the sanctions lifted. Around 270 people are alleged to have received vouchers to sell oil for millions of dollars in profit.

Among the people accused of taking these bribes are the former president of Indonesia, Megawati Soekarnoputri, and, most explosively, the head of the UN's oil-for-food program Benon Sevan.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: oilforfood; un; uncorruption; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Ginifer

Knew about it? Hell, they were part of it. Wait until everything is exposed by congress.


21 posted on 11/21/2004 11:46:41 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: orangelobster
Sounds like the traditional new york mob style of doing business and keeping the peace.

Kickbacks... imagine that. Big business is governed by the principle making money, and the big wheels push things to and beyond the limits of legality all the time. /cynicism

22 posted on 11/21/2004 12:15:36 PM PST by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ginifer
I work for a major oil company, but I have nothing to do with the trading or importation of crude oil. Even I personally was approached by a third party wanting to see if my company wanted to get some Iraqi crude in exchange for a few little favors.

We'll never now exactly how widespread this scandal was.

23 posted on 11/21/2004 3:09:08 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ginifer
MASTER LIST UN OIL/SEX FOR FOOD SCANDALS
24 posted on 11/21/2004 4:41:24 PM PST by GailA (Praise GOD and our Lord Jesus that GW won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Knowing the DNC and the Clintoons, that embedden trucking company probably had to donate 10% of the illegal fees it got to the DNC and the Clintoons.


25 posted on 11/22/2004 5:55:42 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Writers of hate GW/Christians/ Republicans = GIM members, GAY INFECTED MEDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson