Skip to comments.
Good news for causality [Speed of Light]
PhysicsWeb ^
| 18 November 2004
| Belle Dumé
Posted on 11/20/2004 2:00:30 PM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
The figure the article mentions is at the original article, so you'll have to follow the link.
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
Science list Ping! This is an elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.
2
posted on
11/20/2004 2:01:29 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(The all-new List-O-Links for evolution threads is now in my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
Any bets on how many posts it will take for the Luddites to swarm?
To: PatrickHenry
"confirmed that information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light." They obviously did not perform research on my ex-wife in this study.
4
posted on
11/20/2004 2:06:04 PM PST
by
Tarpaulin
(Look it up.)
To: PatrickHenry
What does this say about Bell's work?
I thought all his stuff was confirmed by the Aspect experiments.
5
posted on
11/20/2004 2:06:16 PM PST
by
djf
To: longshadow
The first 10 posts will be of the "Bush did it" type.
6
posted on
11/20/2004 2:06:29 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(The all-new List-O-Links for evolution threads is now in my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
I'm curious about the "interval" between (1.0)C and (1.76)C. What vacuum property causes this (0.76) C difference? Interesting article! Ping.
7
posted on
11/20/2004 2:07:34 PM PST
by
eagle11
(Judge a religion not by the words of its adherents, but by their actions.)
To: eagle11
What vacuum property causes this (0.76) C difference? I donno. I just post 'em.
8
posted on
11/20/2004 2:10:28 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(The all-new List-O-Links for evolution threads is now in my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry

Ans. "a mean group velocity 1.76 times the speed of light in vacuum"
Ques. How long before the first Kerry insider writes a 'tell all" book?
9
posted on
11/20/2004 2:12:55 PM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: PatrickHenry
Well there goes my flux capacitor design.
10
posted on
11/20/2004 2:13:05 PM PST
by
flashbunny
(Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
To: longshadow
You might be suprised at how many "luddites" the "I'm smarter than you" comments will draw. If insults are the cost of learning, I'll just keep my pride and my ignorance thank you.
11
posted on
11/20/2004 2:13:27 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
To: PatrickHenry
Within the first twenty posts there will be a limerick.
12
posted on
11/20/2004 2:14:03 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Nothing means anything when you go to Hell for knowing what things mean.)
13
posted on
11/20/2004 2:15:25 PM PST
by
djf
To: PatrickHenry
Shouldn't this more accurately read, "Physicists in Switzerland have confirmed that information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light when using light as the medium and/or reference point"?
14
posted on
11/20/2004 2:16:57 PM PST
by
Pahuanui
(When a foolish man hears of the Tao, he laughs out loud)
To: PatrickHenry
Since only photons at the front give rise to a signal... But since a photon can be in two places at one time until you observe it, can you really say one was breaking the speed limit while on a cell phone?
To: VadeRetro
"Within the first twenty posts there will be a limerick." There was a young lady named Bright
Who traveled much faster than light
She started one day
In a Relative way
And returned on the previous night.
16
posted on
11/20/2004 2:18:00 PM PST
by
Tarpaulin
(Look it up.)
To: Tarpaulin
Thanks for preventing me from having to fulfill my own prophecy!
17
posted on
11/20/2004 2:18:47 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Nothing means anything when you go to Hell for knowing what things mean.)
To: VadeRetro
and next week they will prove that it can be ...... like the sound barrier all this obsessing about something that is so obvious ..... Albert would be very disappointed...
18
posted on
11/20/2004 2:20:37 PM PST
by
Gibtx
(pajamahadeen call to arms.....)
To: VadeRetro
Within the first twenty posts there will be a limerick.When trying to undo causality,
Fritz removed himself from reality,
When he saw what he'd done,
He said: "This is such fun!"
"I never did really want to be."
It takes a minute or two to compose one of these things.
19
posted on
11/20/2004 2:20:54 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(The all-new List-O-Links for evolution threads is now in my freeper homepage.)
To: Pahuanui
Yes. The special theory of relativity is based on electromagnetic phenomena and the photon. The general theory adds gravity. There are apparently two other kinds of fields. Is there another way to look at this?
20
posted on
11/20/2004 2:21:34 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(these are truths based upon your belief in Darwin's theory)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson