Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cake_crumb

No doubt that she would have been better off leaving the cellphone outside the courtroom.

It just occurred to me that some cell phone company might have thought it'd be a neat feature to make the phone ring when you turn it off, you know, so that it warns you that you're turning it off so you don't accidentally turn it off.

As poorly thought out as many of these devices seem to be, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if someone had already put this "feature" into their cellphones.


256 posted on 11/20/2004 3:56:54 PM PST by brianl703 (Border crossing is a misdemeanor. So is drunk driving. Which do we have more checkpoints for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: brianl703

"No doubt that she would have been better off leaving the cellphone outside the courtroom. "

There are cheap electronic devices that can jam cellphones. If this judge is such a peevish jerk about cellphones he should have pushed to have these installed in the courtroom instead of treating 17 year olds like dirt. These devices will disable cellphones from reception and ringing.


262 posted on 11/20/2004 4:14:24 PM PST by orangelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: brianl703
As poorly thought out as many of these devices seem to be, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if someone had already put this "feature" into their cellphones.

I had a Motorola like that. Even when set to "silent". My method of turning it off discretely was to remove the battery.

456 posted on 04/20/2005 9:42:22 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson