To: brianl703
"No doubt that she would have been better off leaving the cellphone outside the courtroom. "
There are cheap electronic devices that can jam cellphones. If this judge is such a peevish jerk about cellphones he should have pushed to have these installed in the courtroom instead of treating 17 year olds like dirt. These devices will disable cellphones from reception and ringing.
To: orangelobster
"There are cheap electronic devices that can jam cellphones. If this judge is such a peevish jerk about cellphones he should have pushed to have these installed in the courtroom instead of treating 17 year olds like dirt. These devices will disable cellphones from reception and ringing." Paper for signs and the spoken word are cheaper. The judge gave everyone the benefit of free choice.
If you choose to play in the bull ring you better expect to to get some on you. . .
266 posted on
11/20/2004 4:23:25 PM PST by
Dust in the Wind
(I've got peace like a river . . .)
To: orangelobster
There are cheap electronic devices that can jam cellphones. If this judge is such a peevish jerk about cellphones he should have pushed to have these installed in the courtroom Such devices are illegal in the US.
304 posted on
11/22/2004 8:08:04 AM PST by
Modernman
(Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. --Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson