Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The case for free trade has been discredited by mainstream trade economists since the late 1980's. Only now is this fact starting to move outside the walls of Academe.
1 posted on 11/20/2004 9:56:43 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: curiosity
From his website:

[Eamon Fingleton's] earlier book, Blindside: Why Japan Is Still on Track to Overtake the U.S. by the Year 2000, was named one of the Ten Best Business Books of 1995 by Business Week

2 posted on 11/20/2004 9:59:43 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
he has taught economics at MIT for six decades

What, along with that e-communist, Lester Thurow? My economists are better than your economists.
3 posted on 11/20/2004 10:02:56 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
Paul Samuelson is not a first rank economist, he is a semi socialist Keynesian and always has been. This is like a news flash that Karl Marx has doubts about capitalism.
4 posted on 11/20/2004 10:04:28 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Free trade benefits american investors at the expense of american workers. However, the process of globalization is unstoppable and it's utopian to think that much can be done to help either the American worker or the environment until the process of worldwide equalization of standards, living conditions, and legal structures progresses much further than at present.


5 posted on 11/20/2004 10:09:10 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Yeah! And it turns out that the Earth is really flat, afterall.


7 posted on 11/20/2004 10:12:59 AM PST by opinionator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Unfortunately, freepers are biologically unable to admit that free trade is contrary to conservatism.


13 posted on 11/20/2004 10:28:29 AM PST by Nephi (AIDS: The disease originally known as GRIDS (Gay Related Immune Deficiency Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
Although American consumers may benefit via low-low prices at Wal-Mart, their gains may be more than outweighed by large losses sustained by laid-off American workers.

The many now-bankrupt American workers who lost their jobs and their homes can attest to this fact as they're struggling to pay their bills.

I don't hear much concern for American workers in Washington, they're too busy importing more foreigners to do American jobs.

20 posted on 11/20/2004 11:02:25 AM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Ping for later reading.

A good parallel article is: "Benedict Arnold?(Outsourcing U.S. Jobs)"


21 posted on 11/20/2004 11:04:42 AM PST by Kevin OMalley (Kevin O'Malley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Placemarker *Bump*


26 posted on 11/20/2004 11:24:18 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
Free trade has resulted in the loss of jobs to China...who now is in competition with the US for the energy of the world.

Unless we set out to develop a new energy source other than oil, there will be war over oil in the next few years.

We have sewn the seeds of our destruction...China now has our technology to send missiles accurratley to our shores due to the Clinton administration.

We will pay for our stupidity.

38 posted on 11/20/2004 12:11:41 PM PST by Radioactive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
To reiterate my previous multiple reiterations: the problem is not the "loss" of American jobs, the problem is loss of the American Citizen's economic sovereignty and autonomy through government micromanagement and manipulation of personal and national finance.

Not that anyone will understand or agree with me, I post these reiterations "on the record" mainly for my own entertainment so no one in the "aftertimes" will accuse me of "Monday Morning Quarterback Syndrome"

Best regards,

51 posted on 11/20/2004 1:16:26 PM PST by Copernicus (A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Unemployment is a natural result of outsourcing. What did the Yokels in Washington think would happen with NAFTA and GAT? Professor Samuelson makes perfect sense.


55 posted on 11/20/2004 1:31:31 PM PST by Paperdoll (on the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Samuelson is not an economist. He is a Keynesian and therefor a fantasist who specializes in dreams of government omnicompetence.


79 posted on 11/20/2004 4:33:12 PM PST by ThanhPhero (Ong la nguoi di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
A couple of months ago a top economist was in a townhall discussion on cSPAN and he said their economic models never anticipated the internet revolution and how quickly jobs and money could be moved around the world; having a devestating effect on American jobs. His feeling was everyone needed to sitdown and re-think this thing before it gets farther out of control.

They may laugh at Lou Dobbs, but I think he's more right than wrong on this particular issue. I just hope someone wakes up before it's too late and does re-evaluate this. One reason I think a NRST could help return some sanity -- if it really does lower cost of goods sold -- and we get some sort of tort reform and even do something about OSHA we could potentially start to remove some jobs back to the USA.

141 posted on 11/24/2004 12:11:49 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
THe American Civil War settled this argument. States that do not allow slavery can not compete with nor tolerate states that do.

Slavers love "free trade".

154 posted on 11/24/2004 4:01:03 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

bump for later...someday


170 posted on 11/29/2004 1:59:26 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

I'm reading your post late.

What a lot of people don't understand is that conventional wisdom changes. The change is a result of applied wisdom. Meaning, what was smart ten years ago may not be smart now.

It's amazing to see how people cling to their ideas, even after the ideas have been disproven and new thoughts emerge.


172 posted on 12/02/2004 11:40:59 PM PST by sweetjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson