Skip to comments.
California Rep. Lofgren proposes abolishing Electoral College
modbee ^
| 11-19-04
Posted on 11/19/2004 12:39:52 PM PST by LouAvul
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush would have been re-elected this month even if there wasn't an Electoral College, but that hasn't dampened the enthusiasm of some Democrats for abolishing it.
Arguing that voters in populous states like California are underrepresented by the Electoral College, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-San Jose, introduced a constitutional amendment Friday to eliminate it and provide for direct election of the president and vice president.
"Changing the Constitution in this way should not be about advantaging one party over the other," Lofgren said. "It's about treating each American voter equally."
The introduction of Lofgren's amendment is symbolic - coming on one of the final days of the 108th Congress, it won't be acted on this year. But she said she hoped it would draw attention to the issue.
(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: electoralcollege; nodice; nosale; notnilslofgren; toughbounce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
11/19/2004 12:39:52 PM PST
by
LouAvul
To: LouAvul
Screw you Zoe, there is NO way Red America will let you do this. Leave our constitution alone.
2
posted on
11/19/2004 12:41:14 PM PST
by
SoDak
(Home of Senator John Thune)
To: LouAvul
3
posted on
11/19/2004 12:41:29 PM PST
by
zygoat
To: All
To the contrary, I wish someone would propose an amendment to remove the direct election of Senators and go back to having the state legistlatures elect them, as originally intended.
4
posted on
11/19/2004 12:43:06 PM PST
by
Hank All-American
(Free Men, Free Minds, Free Markets baby!)
To: LouAvul
Still smarting over the 2000 results, huh, Zoe?
I notice she goes straight for the kill, bypassing the "proportional" distribution of EV's.
Also, if you can't win by the rules...............change them and/or cheat.
5
posted on
11/19/2004 12:44:00 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(Well, Kerry did win the exit polls.)
To: LouAvul
Perhaps Zoe will endorse an initiative in her home state of California to assign electors on a Congressional District basis like Maine and Nebraska, so that California voters won't be "disenfranchised"?
Fat chance.
6
posted on
11/19/2004 12:44:13 PM PST
by
So Cal Rocket
(Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
To: LouAvul
"Numerous attempts to abolish the Electoral College have failed. Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress and ratification by 38 states - no easy feat because small states are unwilling to abandon the disproportionate influence they get from the Electoral College."So it is written ... so it shall be!
The one thing that needs changing is mini-minds like Lofgren's, etal.
7
posted on
11/19/2004 12:45:49 PM PST
by
G.Mason
(A war mongering, UN hating, military industrial complex loving, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
To: LouAvul
I oppose removing the electoral college, but perhaps a compromise position would be to award a certain number of electoral college votes to the winner of the popular vote. For example if 5 votes were given to the popular vote winner it would make it less likely that the electoral college results would conflict with the popular vote results, but it would still keep the integrity of the electoral college system. Thoughts?
8
posted on
11/19/2004 12:46:29 PM PST
by
PMCarey
To: LouAvul
Another IDIOT speaks......how many states would approve of this? Let's see....New York, Calif, uh....Florida?...maybe Michigan....
9
posted on
11/19/2004 12:47:06 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Tax cuts, Tax reform, social security reform, Supreme Court, etc.....the next 4 years.....)
To: PMCarey
NO. That's my "thoughts."
10
posted on
11/19/2004 12:47:53 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Tax cuts, Tax reform, social security reform, Supreme Court, etc.....the next 4 years.....)
To: LouAvul
There have been over 700 attempts to abolish the Electoral College over the years.
It's still there because of the little states.
11
posted on
11/19/2004 12:49:01 PM PST
by
Beckwith
(John Kerry is now a kept man . . .)
To: LouAvul
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush would have been re-elected this month even if there wasn't an Electoral College, but that hasn't dampened the enthusiasm of some Democrats for abolishing it.The Dems can't win with the people they have on board to run for president regardless of what they jerrymander!
12
posted on
11/19/2004 12:50:24 PM PST
by
VOYAGER
To: LouAvul
They want to be able to take San Francisco and Chicago ballots and stuff them in Ohio and Florida ballot boxes. The Electoral College stands as a partial firewall against national vote fraud.
13
posted on
11/19/2004 12:50:46 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(In a just world, Arafat would have died at the end of a rope.)
To: Hank All-American
Amen!
I'd like to see the 16th and 17th amendments repealed.
14
posted on
11/19/2004 12:51:38 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Liberals are OK with racism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
To: LouAvul
It's called the United States of America for a reason. End of discussion.
15
posted on
11/19/2004 12:52:22 PM PST
by
Argus
To: PMCarey
Only if they were allocated by congressional district like it's done in Maine.
16
posted on
11/19/2004 12:52:29 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Liberals are OK with racism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
To: RockinRight
The 19th Amendment has GOT to go, too!
(Ducking from items thrown by female FREEPERS)
17
posted on
11/19/2004 12:53:52 PM PST
by
IGOTMINE
(One little, two little, three little Hadjis...)
To: LouAvul
Sorry Zoe, but no freaking way are we going to give control of the country to the blue cities. Let's start digging the moats and dust off Max Zorin's plan for the San Andreas. Maybe after "the big one" we'll be ready to entertain a bigger role for the remaining red state of California.
18
posted on
11/19/2004 12:54:03 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("We are in the process of allowing them to self-actualise" LtC. Rainey, Fallujah, 11/04)
To: PMCarey; goodnesswins
Let me expand upon goodnesswin's answer: HELL NO
19
posted on
11/19/2004 12:55:36 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("We are in the process of allowing them to self-actualise" LtC. Rainey, Fallujah, 11/04)
To: RockinRight
I know what you mean. I've been saying that for years.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson