Skip to comments.
Democrat warns on CIA changes
AP ^
| 11/19
Posted on 11/19/2004 10:40:17 AM PST by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
11/19/2004 10:40:17 AM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
2
posted on
11/19/2004 10:41:39 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ken5050
Who are these people to be issuing warnings? They just LOST! Sheesh.
3
posted on
11/19/2004 10:42:11 AM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
They had nothing but failures during the Bubba years Dianne. Time for you to get a clue lady!
To: ambrose
Yeah..let's keep the CIA status quo..they're doing such a great job..
5
posted on
11/19/2004 10:44:41 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ambrose
A Democratic senator warned CIA director Porter Goss yesterday that his efforts to make major changes could have ''a significant and negative effect on the agency." *picking jaw up off the floor*
Leave it to Frau Feinswine to think that the CIA is in fine shape now! Hell, the entire mess we have in the CIA is due exclusively to petty Leftist partisanship like she's demonstrating now.
Why Californians keep re-electing that dumb broad is beyond me.
6
posted on
11/19/2004 10:44:49 AM PST
by
Prime Choice
(STFU ACLU.)
To: ambrose
7
posted on
11/19/2004 10:45:52 AM PST
by
Max Combined
(Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
To: ambrose
To the Left, ''a significant and negative effect on the agency." means "it will actually do it's job, and that means more of our leftist allies around the world would be found out..."
8
posted on
11/19/2004 10:46:20 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(Fascists Unhappy Concerning Kerry's Election Defeat.)
To: Prime Choice
DIFI just wantstomakesure hubby can import chicom
Ak-47's (not AW Types) to LA Gangs
9
posted on
11/19/2004 10:46:47 AM PST
by
dts32041
(bortaS bIr jablu'DI' reH QaQqu' nay)
To: ambrose
"a significant and negative effect on the agency."
Secret Code for "De-Clintonizing the CIA"
10
posted on
11/19/2004 10:46:49 AM PST
by
Dalite
(If PRO is the opposite of CON, What is the opposite of PROgress? Go Figure....)
To: ambrose
DiFi will call in the Teamsters to unionize the CIA so as to maintain the status quo.
11
posted on
11/19/2004 10:46:52 AM PST
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.n)
To: ken5050; Prime Choice
of course, when Bush does nothing with the CIA, they attack him for this as well.
12
posted on
11/19/2004 10:47:04 AM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
"Feinstein said Goss has the responsibility to minimize the difficulties of an overhaul."
Shut the Eff up PLEASE. Goss has a responsiblity to overhaul, not to minimize the difficulties in doing so. The CIA wasn't working before Senator so why don't you just shut your pie hole since YOU've been part of the problem. YOU LOST now shut up and go back to your seat.
13
posted on
11/19/2004 10:47:08 AM PST
by
ReeseKev27
(Hey Liberals YOU LOST get over it already)
To: ken5050
WASHINGTON -- An (Internationalist) warned CIA director Porter Goss yesterday that his efforts to make major changes could have ''a significant and negative effect on the International World of Bribery?."
This is NOT about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Nothing here,.....move on......
14
posted on
11/19/2004 10:47:36 AM PST
by
maestro
To: ambrose
It's funny. Because at the end of the day, their press conferences don't amount to a pile of guano. THERE IS NOTHING SHE CAN DO EXCEPT CRY AND THROUGH A DEMOCRAT FIT. Bwaaahhaahhhhaaaa.
15
posted on
11/19/2004 10:47:37 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(I'll take 1 good "LET'S ROLL!" over 1,000 meaningless & vulgar "ALLAH AHKBAR"'s, any day!)
To: ambrose
The title should read Democrats attempt to be relevent.
16
posted on
11/19/2004 10:48:51 AM PST
by
Tempest
(Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
To: ambrose
Damned if you do, and damned if you don't. These democrats know nothing except to be against anything that W does.
17
posted on
11/19/2004 10:49:00 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(Well, Kerry did win the exit polls.)
To: ambrose
Oh dear... not just a democrat, but Dianne Freakin' Feinstein! Will the good news ever end??? If Dianne thinks this is BAD for the agency, it simply couldn't be any better. She's wrong about simply everything, but on defense/intel, she's got to be maliciously wrong.
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
18
posted on
11/19/2004 10:49:29 AM PST
by
End Times Sentinel
(France, because the moral compass of humanity needs a butt end.)
To: ambrose
In a letter to Goss, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of Calif., also said she feared the ''politicization of our intelligence services" because of an e-mail Goss sent this week to agency employees telling them to focus on serving the Bush administration. I believe the complete quote was that she feared the "politicization of our intelligence services ... with anyone other than boot-licking DNC sycophants and Clinton Administration lackeys."
19
posted on
11/19/2004 10:49:39 AM PST
by
spodefly
(I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
To: ambrose
DiFi doesn't fear the "politicization of our intelligence services" as long as that politicization leans to the left. The only politicization she fears is the cleaning out of the leftist trolls that keep things going her way.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson