Posted on 11/19/2004 9:17:50 AM PST by CHARLITE
Undoubtedly, Shiite rule would thrill them. As a result, within just hours of Mr. Bushs remarks, Iran had its own somewhat shocking proclamation when the head of their Supreme National Security Council, Hasan Rowhani, stated that Tehran supported our presidents re-election efforts.
As if that wasnt enough, that same day, Grand Ayatollah Kazem al-Haeri, a senior Shiite leader in Iran, made a similarly stunning announcement that he was cutting ties with the upstart Shiite cleric in Iraq, Muqtada al-Sadr. When combined with the other two events, especially given the timing of all three, it quite appears that Tehran was not only trying to send signals to the U.S., but also potentially cutting off al-Sadrs legs in hopes of advancing an election that Iran likely now would love to occur given the possibility of a Shiite government being installed. Yet, this still begs the question: Why is Iran suddenly so interested in appeasing its public enemy number one?
(Excerpt) Read more at michnews.com ...
"Yeah but, Our Nukes are better than your Nukes. And, our Uncle Sam can beat up your MullahDaddy"
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin
And I consider myself a "moderate."
Afghanistan on one side, Iraq on the other, and a younger generation that seeks to throw off the yoke of the regime might be one of the considerations, I'll wager.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.