Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawks flying high with Rice posting vv
Asia Times ^ | 11.18.04 | Jim Lobe

Posted on 11/18/2004 8:37:29 PM PST by Dr. Marten

Hawks flying high with Rice posting By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - US President George W Bush's nomination of National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice to replace Secretary of State Colin Powell consolidates the control over US foreign policy of the coalition of hawks that promoted the war in Iraq, led by Vice President Dick Cheney.

The promotion of Rice's deputy, Stephen Hadley, to take her place in the White House also confirms Cheney's pre-eminence in Bush's second term.

A major booster of national missile defense and the development of "usable" mini-nuclear weapons, Hadley held a key policy position under the vice president when Cheney served as Pentagon chief under Bush's father, president George H W Bush, from 1989-93.

Growing speculation that another Cheney ally, Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security John Bolton, will be nominated to serve as deputy secretary of state under Rice is adding to the impression that the hawks are on the verge of a clean sweep.

As expected, the State Department's current No 2, Richard Armitage, announced his resignation on Tuesday, thus opening another key slot in the foreign-policy bureaucracy and one on which Bolton and his neo-conservative and ultra-unilateralist backers have had their eyes for months.

"This is a statement that Bush sees that what he's done in his first term is the way he wants to go into the second term, if not a bit more so," said Jonathan Clarke, a former British analyst based at the libertarian Cato Institute and co-author of America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order.

"It's a way of saying, 'If you liked what you saw in the first administration, you're going to love the second one,'" he said in an interview.

Although Rice began her tenure as Bush's national security adviser a traditional "realist", stressing the importance of bolstering US alliances and of committing US troops overseas only in cases where vital national interests were threatened, she was careful from the outset to avoid alienating right-wing forces, particularly Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

On key issues, particularly surrounding the lead-up to the Iraq war, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the US posture toward Iran and North Korea, she more often either aligned herself with or deferred to the hawks, especially Cheney, than she sided with Powell.

That was an immense frustration to the former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had assumed at the beginning that, like himself, she was committed to the pragmatic multilateralism of George H W Bush and their mutual mentor, former national security adviser Brent Scowcroft.

Thus Rice ordered an early draft of the administration's December 2002 National Security Strategy (NSS) that was written by Powell protege and current president of the Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haass to be completely rewritten, according to James Mann, author of a highly regarded study of the Bush war cabinet, Rise of the Vulcans.

"She thought the Bush administration needed something bolder, something that would represent a more dramatic break with the ideas of the past," noted Mann.

As rewritten, the NSS marked a comprehensive endorsement of most of the controversial ideas put forward under Bush, including global US military dominance, preemption against possible enemies, the aggressive promotion of democracy overseas and the rejection of multilateral mechanisms or treaties that might constrain the exercise of US power.

But Rice appears to have been picked to run the State Department as much for her fierce personal loyalty to Bush as for her own foreign-policy views.

Recommended originally by Scowcroft and former secretary of state George Shultz to serve as Bush's principal foreign-policy adviser during his 2000 campaign, Rice, who shares a love of American football and physical fitness with the president, hit it off immediately with the future leader.

During the past five years, she has frequently spent weekends at the presidential retreat at Camp David or at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, with the Bush family.

The closeness of her relationship with Bush - something that entirely eluded Powell, whose unequaled international and popular standing appeared to evoke some resentment in both the president and vice president - would normally be seen as a plus by the foreign-service officers who toil at the State Department, because it ensures that their views will heard in the White House.

According to Mann, that may yet turn out to be the case. "The White House saw Powell as an independent force and an independent operator," he said, adding that such independence limited his influence.

"Rice, who will be more hawkish, will also now be the spokesman for the State Department and for diplomacy within the administration, and I can imagine situations where, once in a while, the same policies that would have been rejected if they came from Powell might get a better reception at the White House because they came from Rice."

At the same time, Mann described the posting as "Bush's way of establishing his political control over the State Department", which has been seen by many of the hawks and their backers in the media as resisting the president's more aggressive policies. In this view, Rice, like newly assigned Porter Goss at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), will act as an enforcer of Bush's policy "vision" in the department and as a reliable communicator of the president's line to foreign governments.

"She will be a much more forceful advocate [of Bush's policy] to American allies and partners and less inclined to be a sponge for their frustrations," said Clarke. "She'll be more inclined to take the fight to them and not allow the outside world to think that she is somehow a channel into the foreign-policy-making process to deflect or undermine the president's policies."

Many State Department officials expressed serious concerns about Rice's appointment on Tuesday, even as they were recovering from Monday's announcement by Powell that he was indeed leaving.

Powell, who devoted considerable time and effort to managing the department, had raised morale significantly from its nadir under his predecessor, Madeleine Albright, who tended to ignore the career officers in favor of a small group of political appointees. "We're so sad to see him go," said one veteran, who noted that Rice's managerial experience has been far more limited.

Indeed, most analysts assess her experience overseeing the National Security Council (NSC) staff quite negatively because of her reluctance to take a position when policies were deadlocked, to ensure that all sides were heard, and to enforce discipline on the various agencies once a policy was decided. As a result, policy reviews in key areas, such as Iran and North Korea, to cite two of the most prominent examples, dragged on for months and in some cases were never completed.

To the great frustration of Powell and former CIA director George Tenet, Rice tolerated informal channels of communication between the mainly neo-conservative appointees around Rumsfeld and Cheney's office, which is headed by his neo-con chief of staff and national security adviser, I Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

Libby, whose own national-security staff has been exceptionally large and aggressive, "is able to run circles around Condi", one former NSC staffer told Inter Press Service last year (see Cheney's grip tight on foreign policy reins, Oct 23, 2003).

Hadley, a lawyer by profession, is seen as a hardline technocrat who has specialized in nuclear weapons and national missile defense. He has been a major advocate of preemption and the development of "mini-nukes" and other new nuclear weapons that could be used for conventional purposes.

Considered particularly discreet - even self-effacing - Hadley came under strong criticism in various reports in the run-up to the war in Iraq, primarily because of his close working relationship with Libby on promoting a number of now-discredited efforts to tie ousted Iraqi president Saddam Hussein to al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and to assert that Saddam was reconstituting a nuclear-weapons program. v


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: napalminthemorning; partyofthehindparts; religionofpeace; wot
Jim Lobe is such a turd...
1 posted on 11/18/2004 8:37:29 PM PST by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

Could spend all night picking apart this article, but it is easier just to laugh.


2 posted on 11/18/2004 8:42:37 PM PST by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
coalition of hawks

Verses a coalition of name calling hippies? Hawks is mean spirited derogatory term.

3 posted on 11/18/2004 8:47:19 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ksnavely
"It's a way of saying, 'If you liked what you saw in the first administration, you're going to love the second one,'" he said in an interview.

I'll take a swing for ya'...

"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far." 

       - West African proverb popularized by Theodore Roosevelt.

4 posted on 11/18/2004 8:51:37 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Ping


5 posted on 11/18/2004 9:02:25 PM PST by nw_arizona_granny (Today, please pray for God's miracle, we are not going to make it without him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

"Hawks flying high with Rice"

Every Secretary of State for 60 years has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. The State Department has nothing but CFR lackeys. No, our foreign policy will continue to be set, by a private club in NYC.


6 posted on 11/18/2004 9:05:02 PM PST by Rocky2 (Libertarians ain't fooled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

I'm an eagle, not a friggin' hawk!


7 posted on 11/18/2004 9:41:31 PM PST by Angry Republican (yvan eht nioj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson