Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feinstein Warns Goss Against CIA Reforms
AP ^ | 11/18/04

Posted on 11/18/2004 6:36:45 PM PST by nypokerface

WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator warned CIA Director Porter Goss Thursday that his efforts to make major changes could have "a significant and negative effect on the agency."

In a letter to Goss, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., also said she feared the "politicization of our intelligence services" because of an e-mail Goss sent this week to agency employees telling them to serve the Bush administration.

Goss, former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, took office in September and named some of his former congressional staffers to high-level positions at the agency.

Several senior CIA officials have resigned in recent weeks, an apparent sign of friction between them and Goss' aides.

The changes have raised concerns that agency turmoil could disrupt intelligence efforts at a time of war. But Goss' supporters say he is trying to make urgently needed reforms. Intelligence agencies have been sharply criticized for failing to stop the Sept. 11 attacks and providing inaccurate intelligence on Iraq's weapons programs.

Feinstein, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Goss has the responsibility to minimize the difficulties that come with an overhaul. "I am concerned that recent developments run counter to that goal."

She said Goss' e-mail to employees "is likely to cause confusion at best and mislead agency employees at worst."

In the e-mail, Goss said, "We do not identify with, support or champion opposition to the administration or its policies. We provide the intelligence as we see it — and let the facts alone speak to the policy-maker."

Feinstein wrote: "I hope that what you meant was that agency employees neither support nor oppose administration policies. But that is not what your communication said."

There was no immediate response from the CIA.

Another committee member, Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., offered support for Goss.

"We urged Porter Goss to go in and shake the place up," Lott said in a brief interview. "He's doing it. More than likely it's a good idea."


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: cia; civilwar; feinstein; goss; intelligencereform; married2who; reddiane; shutupcommiespy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: searchandrecovery

Oh, and with the semicolon on the end, IIRC.


81 posted on 11/18/2004 9:49:31 PM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

CIA is part of the executive branch. The witch doesn't have any oversight responsibility for it or any jurisdiction whatever, unless the president consents.


82 posted on 11/18/2004 9:52:57 PM PST by Tax Government (Boycott and defeat the Legacy Media. Become a monthly contributor to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Old turkey neck obviously doesn't realize that she is a minor senator in a shrinking party. She has no ability to warn, she can only whine.


83 posted on 11/18/2004 10:11:54 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator warned CIA Director Porter Goss Thursday that his efforts to make major changes could have "a significant and negative effect on the agency."

Translation, "You are fixing the agency and making Bush look good."

84 posted on 11/18/2004 10:14:49 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey

"I wonder how many intelligence reports have passed from Diane Feinswine to the ChiComs."

Then how many millions did DiFi's super rich husband make from payback from the ChiComs?


85 posted on 11/18/2004 10:16:36 PM PST by Grampa Dave (FNC/ABCNNBCBS & the MSM fishwraps are the Rathering Fraudcasters of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
"Feinstein wrote: "I hope that what you meant was that agency employees neither support nor oppose administration policies. But that is not what your communication said."

As usual, the Democrats apparently possess some mystical ability to divine meaning beyond anything either the author or non-Democratic readers are capable of.

86 posted on 11/18/2004 10:16:40 PM PST by intolerancewillNOTbetolerated (I suck at my current job, so PROMOTE me. - Peter-Principle Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

"Would she prefer the CIA to serve some other administration instead? Perhaps they should receive a direct line to FORMER President Clinton or maybe Carter or Ford, and instead serve one of them. This is ludicrous..."

All of this whining and moaning from the Carterites and Clintoonistas left over in the CIA and from the MSM and rats like DI Fi show that Goss is doing the right thing.


87 posted on 11/18/2004 10:18:58 PM PST by Grampa Dave (FNC/ABCNNBCBS & the MSM fishwraps are the Rathering Fraudcasters of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD; SierraWasp; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Shermy; tubebender; RonDog

"I wonder what she (and her husband) are so worried about? This is VERY interesting!"

That was the first thing that went through my mind. One of her friends at the agency about to be bounced out, probably demanded protection from DIFI with a viewed warning: "Protect me or I spill the beans!"


88 posted on 11/18/2004 10:21:42 PM PST by Grampa Dave (FNC/ABCNNBCBS & the MSM fishwraps are the Rathering Fraudcasters of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface


Shuddup Diane, what are you scared of ?
89 posted on 11/18/2004 10:26:53 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
...she feared the "politicization of our intelligence services"

What the heck, that's the problem now... it's filled with Clinton flunkies who just want to leak memos and make the current administration look bad...
I say it's validation that Goss is on the right track! The RATS are starting squeak and scramble...
90 posted on 11/18/2004 10:31:55 PM PST by Barney59 (Honesty is the only policy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpencil1
Hey Feinstein, why don't you get a job as a display in a wax museum.

I grudgingly agree with you...the great State of California has two fossilized so called Senators doing exactly nothing for the largest State in the Union.

Two Old bags full of hot air and no delivery.

91 posted on 11/18/2004 10:34:00 PM PST by danmar ("Reason obeys itself, and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dmartin
I like your idea. The only problem with it is having to pretend that your one of them long enough to get in. After a few hours you will be hard pressed to keep yourself from snapping their necks. Or so I've heard...

LOL! After 3/4 of one semester with a lib prof, I have NO doubt about this
92 posted on 11/18/2004 10:36:27 PM PST by Smacky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Feinswine is full of gas like the barber's cat.
Go, Porter! Clean the Bush-torpedoing leakers and the rest of the scum outta there.


93 posted on 11/18/2004 10:37:12 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey

Ask her hubby. He would know (He does a large amount of buiness w/ the PRC)


94 posted on 11/19/2004 3:38:47 AM PST by SirLurkedalot (Thank You Veterans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
These leftists are coming unglued as their intel sources get 'WALLED' up.
95 posted on 11/19/2004 3:40:35 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

Precisely.


96 posted on 11/19/2004 3:42:44 AM PST by IStillBelieve (G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular-vote victory in history, and first popular-vote majority in 16 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

I voted for Bush, but she is right.

The CIA is now a Praetorian Guard dedicated to protecting Bush politically.

However, it will no longer be capable of protecting Bush, the government or our people from Bin Laden.

It will no longer be capable of getting us good intelligence.

That is because Murray is running things, and he has fired the people who could have protected us. He smeared them as leakers and as people who undermined Bush.

That is a BIG FAT LIE.

We are now in a very dangerous situation because of the arrogance of small men with big power.


97 posted on 11/19/2004 3:59:47 AM PST by Snapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
.


NY PokerFace,


A Democratic senator warned CIA Director Porter Goss Thursday that his efforts to make major changes could have "a significant and negative effect on the agency."


Yep ! Diane's absolutely right.


Goss's primary mission is to PURGE the CIA from the politically-correct democrat treasonous fools that have infected the Agency for the last TEN years ...

... and have caused UNTOLD damage and horror for the American people (starting with both WTC bombings by the IslamoFascists).


Diane AND Osmama Ben Laden Laden & Zarquawi (sp) & North Korea's Kim-Boy are shakin' in their collective knickers as "Bush the Victorious" begins his second term of office.




Patton@Bastogne



.
98 posted on 11/19/2004 4:19:04 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: searchandrecovery

RE: Indenting. I've tried and been frustrated. Found that the only way to indent is to hit the space bar five times. 8^(


99 posted on 11/19/2004 7:49:17 AM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
she feared the "politicization of our intelligence services"

She fears losing the CIA as a branch office for the DNC.

100 posted on 11/19/2004 7:51:25 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson