Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xm177e2

Nope. A lawyer who has him/herself as a client is a bigger fool than just any lawyer. Nope. You get your own lawyer. That way, someone unattached to the emotional side of the case is thinking clearly.


144 posted on 11/18/2004 2:10:14 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Don't relax because we won the election! Defending against Socialist is an every day war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: RetiredArmy
Nope. A lawyer who has him/herself as a client is a bigger fool than just any lawyer. Nope. You get your own lawyer. That way, someone unattached to the emotional side of the case is thinking clearly.

I agree in general principle, and on most cases people should have lawyers to represent them. But...

O'Neill spent the past few months making his case against John Kerry--the same exact case that would be made in the courtroom (proving that his charges are true, except he would have the benefit of discovery). He probably would have lawyers on his defense team to help him, but I think he'd want to be the big dog. SBVfT was his baby, bringing down Kerry was his project, and this would be his chance to nail Kerry once and for all.

He's also had three decades and a Presidential campaign to deal with the emotional side of the case. I doubt he would screw it up because of his emotions.

Of course, it's not going to happen, because Kerry doesn't want to face up to the truth.

148 posted on 11/18/2004 4:30:02 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson