Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLL: COULD USA DEFEAT A TRIPLE ALLIANCE OF CHINA, EU AND RUSSIA? (Go Vote!!!
BestandWorst.com ^

Posted on 11/17/2004 5:18:33 PM PST by TapTheSource

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: SirLurkedalot

The "Smart hulk" was lame. Classic mean and green all the way.


101 posted on 11/18/2004 2:12:18 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel ("Nature abhors a moron."-H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Damn straight.


102 posted on 11/19/2004 12:07:57 AM PST by SirLurkedalot (Thank You Veterans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

I Doubt The Sino-Russia Alliance Would Include The EU, But It Would Be Funny To See The New American Land Lord TO Be Mr. Hu And Mr. Putin Or More Commonly Referred As A Joke As Mr. Wang And Mr. Russki


103 posted on 11/19/2004 2:23:27 PM PST by Arial Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

If we are talking about a total destruction then the USA can simply nuke them all...
but if we are talking about invasion too China, Russia and Europe, the answer will be no, simply because the US doesnt have the men power to do so, it cannot invade China, Russia and Europe by itself.
However if its just USA vs China or just USA vs Russia or just USA against Europe, then sure the USA will kick their asses!
But an allience? I am affraid thats too much, eaven for the USA.


104 posted on 11/19/2004 2:30:59 PM PST by IAF ThunderPilot (Israeli Defence Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

NEW T-SHIRT: FU EU


105 posted on 11/19/2004 2:32:37 PM PST by Greek (GEORGE THE THIRD IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

But myabe if Israel and Australia and maybe Japan even joins the USA, then we would see a victory!


106 posted on 11/19/2004 2:36:36 PM PST by IAF ThunderPilot (Israeli Defence Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Smell that?.....Nothing like the smell of napalm in the morning....It's the smell of victory...add a few isotopes and...........


107 posted on 11/19/2004 3:02:46 PM PST by cbkaty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

It depends on who is Commander in Chief at the time. With Hillary as POTUS and Bill Clibton in charge of the UN, the United States of New France would surrender and call for UN troops to help squash the uprisings that would result.


108 posted on 11/19/2004 3:32:40 PM PST by UnChained
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

Comment #109 Removed by Moderator

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: TapTheSource
Could we win? Consider this. We have 1000's of nuclear warheads ready to launch in about 20 minutes should the need arise. Even if somehow the enemy should manage to destroy ALL our land based missiles we have 24 nuke subs on patrol at all times. Each sub carries either 20 or 24 missiles and each warhead is mrvd to have 10 bombs. That means about 240 nuke bombs per sub times 24 sea based subs for a total of approximately 5200 nuclear bombs able to devastate any enemy.

What they did to the mainland would have a bearing on whether we 'won' or not but one thing is for sure. They cannot possibly 'win' since all of Europe Asia and the ME if necessary would be glowing slag.
111 posted on 11/20/2004 2:26:32 PM PST by JoeV1 (The Democrats-The unlawful and corrupt leading the uneducated and blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeV1

What do you think our chances would be against the Eurasian Alliance in a conventional war?


112 posted on 11/20/2004 2:31:14 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
Don't know. If we came to that place and we seemed to be losing due to being outnumbered in the field and that numerical disadvantage couldn't be overcome by our superior weaponry (conventional) then were it up to me I would issue a warning for the enemy to cease and desist and surrender or else face the use of tactical nukes. However once that threat is made it MUST be followed through with action if in fact the enemy doesn't surrender.
113 posted on 11/20/2004 2:40:20 PM PST by JoeV1 (The Democrats-The unlawful and corrupt leading the uneducated and blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

If God's on our side.


114 posted on 11/20/2004 2:42:34 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
I tried to vote by pushing the "This is a dumb ass question" button but that option was omitted.
115 posted on 11/20/2004 2:44:24 PM PST by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

The web site is obviously a DU-operated outfit. Check out their other polls for evidence. Gag!


116 posted on 11/20/2004 2:47:49 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

The classic Hulk theoretically had no limit to his strength - the angrier he got, the stronger he got, and since there was no limit to his anger, there was no limit to his strength.

Classic Hulk vs Superman is a tough riddle, no question - Superman would outwit the Hulk, no question, but in theory, as strong as Superman is, the Hulk is potentially stronger.


117 posted on 11/20/2004 2:48:16 PM PST by HitmanLV (HitmanNY has a brand new Blog!! Please Visit! - http://www.goldust.com/weblog -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

One major flaw in the probability of this scenario is that if the US goes down, that leaves EU and Russia to face China. Regardless of their hate for the US, they are not arrogant enough to want to face the horde of billions of Asians that would swarm north and east like loccusts.


118 posted on 11/20/2004 2:50:22 PM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus

"The web site is obviously a DU-operated outfit."

I just stumbled onto the poll doing an internet search. I liked the poll because it gets America (and the world) thinking about the growing Eurasian Alliance. BTW, what does DU mean???


119 posted on 11/20/2004 2:52:17 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: michaelbfree

Namor, the sub-mariner would emerge from the sea & wreak havoc on the evil triumvirate of eu, the rooskies and the depraved followers of mao!


120 posted on 11/20/2004 2:58:27 PM PST by NoClones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson