Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bin Laden Expert Steps Forward
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/11/12/60minutes/printable655407.shtml ^ | November 14, 2004

Posted on 11/17/2004 10:59:58 AM PST by Howlin

One of the Central Intelligence Agency's foremost experts on Osama bin Laden has stepped out of the shadows and joined the public debate over past mistakes and future strategy in the war on terror.

Michael Scheuer is the senior intelligence analyst who created and advised a secret CIA unit for tracking and eliminating bin Laden since 1996. He's also been at the center of a battle between the CIA and the White House over Mideast policy and the war on terror.

What is new for Scheuer - who resigned from the intelligence agency on Friday after 22 years - is commenting by name. This summer, he authored a book, "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror," under the pen name Anonymous.

The book, written with the CIA's blessing, is critical of the Bush administration's counterterrorism policy, and was viewed by some at the White House as a thinly veiled attempt by the CIA to undermine the president's reelection.

In his first television interview, Scheuer talked to Correspondent Steve Kroft about his frustrations in the war on terror and his assessment of bin Laden's plans - including the al Qaeda founder's interest in nuclear weapons.


Former CIA agent Michael Scheuer spoke to 60 Minutes in his first television interview out of the shadows.

After a 22-year career as a spy charged with keeping secrets, Scheuer decided it was more important to join the public debate on how to best attack Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda.

"His genius lies in his ability to isolate a few American policies that are widely hated across the Muslim world. And that growing hatred is going to yield growing violence," says Scheuer. "Our leaders continue to say that we're making strong headway against this problem. And I think we are not."

In 1996, at a time when little was known about the wealthy Saudi, other than he was suspected of financing terrorism, Scheuer was assigned to create a bin Laden desk at the CIA.

"The uniqueness of the unit was more or less that it was focused on a single individual. It was really the first time the agency had done that sort of effort," says Scheuer.

Did he try to figure out where bin Laden was? "Where he was, where his cells were, where his logistical channels were," says Scheuer. "How he communicated. Who his allies were. Who donated to them... I think it's fair to say the entire range of sources were brought to bear."

Codenamed "Alec," the unit was originally made up of about a dozen agents. And in less than a year, they discovered that bin Laden was more than some wealthy Saudi throwing his money around - and that his organization, known as al Qaeda, was not a Muslim charity.

"We had found that he and al Qaeda were involved in an extraordinarily sophisticated and professional effort to acquire weapons of mass destruction. In this case, nuclear material, so by the end of 1996, it was clear that this was an organization unlike any other one we had ever seen," says Scheuer.
Scheuer says his bosses at the CIA were initially skeptical of that information. And that was just the beginning of his frustrations.

In a letter to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees earlier this year, Scheuer says his agents provided the U.S. government with about ten opportunities to capture bin Laden before Sept. 11, and that all of them were rejected.

One of the last proposals, which he described to the 9/11 Commission in a closed-door session, involved a cruise missile attack against a remote hunting camp in the Afghan desert, where bin Laden was believed to be socializing with members of the royal family from the United Arab Emirates.

Scheuer wanted to level the entire camp. "The world is lousy with Arab princes," says Scheuer. "And if we could have got Osama bin Laden, and saved at some point down the road 3,000 American lives, a few less Arab princes would have been OK in my book."

"You couldn't have done this without killing an Arab prince," asks Kroft.

"Probably not. Sister Virginia used to say, 'You'll be known by the company you keep.' That if those princes were out there eating goat with Osama bin Laden, then maybe they were there for nefarious reasons. But nonetheless, they would have been the price of battle."

And that doesn't bother him? "Not a lick," says Scheuer.

"My understanding is you had a reputation within the CIA as being fairly obsessive about this subject," says Kroft. "I dislike obsessive," says Scheuer. "I think hard-headed about it."

Whatever you call it, in 1999, three years after he started the bin Laden unit, Scheuer's candor got him into trouble with his supervisors at the CIA. What were the circumstances under which he left the bin Laden unit?

"I think I became too insistent that we were not pursuing this target with enough vigor and with enough risk-taking - - an unwillingness to take risks," says Scheuer. "I got relieved of the position I was in. I had a lovely sojourn in the library and then had other sojourns since."

His exile ended shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, when he was brought back to the bin Laden unit as a special adviser. But by then, everything had changed.

His nemesis had gone underground, and the United States was on its way to invading Afghanistan and Iraq - creating, Scheuer says, the perception in the minds of 1.3 billion Muslims that America had gone to war against Islam.

"The war in Iraq - if Osama was a Christian - it's the Christmas present he never would have expected," says Scheuer.
Right or wrong, he says Muslims are beginning to view the United States as a colonial power with Israel as its surrogate, and with a military presence in three of the holiest places in Islam: the Arabian peninsula, Iraq, and Jerusalem. And he says it is time to review and debate American policy in the region, even our relationship with Israel.

"No one wants to abandon the Israelis. But I think the perception is, and I think it's probably an accurate perception, that the tail is leading the dog - that we are giving the Israelis carte blanche ability to exercise whatever they want to do in their area," says Scheuer. "And if that's what the American people want, then that's what the policy should be, of course. But the idea that anything in the United States is too sensitive to discuss or too dangerous to discuss is really, I think, absurd."

Is he talking about appeasement?

"I'm not talking about appeasement. There's no way out of this war at the moment," says Scheuer. "It's not a choice between war and peace. It's a choice between war and endless war. It's not appeasement. I think it's better even to call it American self-interest."

Scheuer believes that al Qaeda is no longer just a terrorist organization that can be defeated by killing or capturing its leaders. Now, he says it's a global insurgency that's spreading revolutionary fervor throughout the Muslim world.

"Bin Laden's still at large. His most recent speech, I think, demonstrates that he's not running rock to rock, cave to cave. We are tangled in a very significant Islamic insurgency in Iraq," says Scheuer.

"Most dramatically, and perhaps least noticed, is the violence inside Saudi Arabia itself. Saudi Arabia was, until just a few years ago, probably one of the most safe countries on earth. And now the paper is daily full of activities and shootouts between Islamists who supported Osama bin Laden and the government there."

But if bin Laden is much stronger than he was, why haven't there been more attacks on the United States?

"One of the great intellectual failures of the American intelligence community, and especially the counterterrorism community, is to assume if someone hasn't attacked us, it's because he can't or because we've defeated him," says Scheuer. "Bin Laden has consistently shown himself to be immune to outside pressure. When he wants to do something, he does it on his own schedule."

"You've written no one should be surprised when Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda detonate a weapon of mass destruction in the United States," says Kroft. "You believe that's going to happen?"

"I don't believe in inevitability. But I think it's pretty close to being inevitable," says Scheuer.

A nuclear weapon? "A nuclear weapon of some dimension, whether it's actually a nuclear weapon, or a dirty bomb, or some kind of radiological device," says Scheuer. "Yes, I think it's probably a near thing."

What evidence is there that bin Laden's actually working to do this? "He's told us it. Bin Laden is remarkably eager for Americans to know why he doesn't like us, what he intends to do about it and then following up and doing something about it in terms of military actions," says Scheuer. "He's told us that, 'We are going to acquire a weapon of mass destruction, and if we acquire it, we will use it.'"
After Sept. 11, Scheuer says bin Laden was criticized by Muslim clerics for launching such a serious attack without sufficient warning. That has now been given. And he says bin Laden has even obtained a fatwa, or Islamic decree, justifying a nuclear attack against the United States on religious grounds.

"He secured from a Saudi sheik named Hamid bin Fahd a rather long treatise on the possibility of using nuclear weapons against the Americans. Specifically, nuclear weapons," says Scheuer. "And the treatise found that he was perfectly within his rights to use them. Muslims argue that the United States is responsible for millions of dead Muslims around the world, so reciprocity would mean you could kill millions of Americans."

Scheuer says the fatwa was issued in May 2003, "and that's another thing that doesn't come to the attention of the American people."

Despite this threat, Scheuer insists the CIA doesn't have nearly enough trained analysts working on the Osama bin Laden unit today. At a time when Congress is considering revolutionary changes in the way the intelligence community is organized, Scheuer sees no major problems with the CIA or the product it produces.

He blames Sept. 11 on poor leadership from people like former CIA Director George Tenet, his chief deputy, Jim Pavitt, and former White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, who were invited, but declined, to appear on Sunday's 60 Minutes.

"Richard Clarke has said that you're really sort of a hothead, a middle manager who really didn't go to any of the cabinet meetings in which important things were discussed, and that basically you were just uninformed," says Kroft.

"I certainly agree with the fact that I didn't go to the cabinet meetings. But I'm certainly also aware that I'm much better informed than Mr. Clarke ever was about the nature of the intelligence that was available again Osama bin Laden and which was consistently denigrated by himself and Mr. Tenet," says Scheuer.

"I think Mr. Clarke had a tendency to interfere too much with the activities of the CIA, and our leadership at the senior level let him interfere too much," says Scheuer. "So criticism from him I kind of wear as a badge of honor."

Is there anything about bin Laden that Americans don't know, but should? "Yeah, I think there is. I think our leaders over the last decade have done the American people a disservice in continuing to characterize Osama bin Laden as a thug, as a gangster, as a degenerate personality, as some kind of abhorrent individual," says Scheuer.

"He surely does reprehensible activities, and we should surely take care of that by killing him as soon as we can. But he's not an irrational man. He's a very worthy enemy. He's an enemy to worry about."

"You wrote in your book that he's a great man," says Kroft.

"Yes, certainly a man, without the connotation good or bad, he's a great man in the sense that he's influenced the course of history," says Scheuer.

Does he respect bin Laden? "Until we respect him, we are going to die in numbers that are probably unnecessary," says Scheuer.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; scheuer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping!

WHY do all of these incompetent nincompoops,go on 60 Minutes,to spew their spurious propaganda? BECAUSE THEY CAN!

No wonder we got hit on 9/11...eight years of the Clintons ignoring the problem and jerks,like Sheuer,in charge at the CIA! Proof positive,that we need THE PATRIOT ACT and a clean sweep out of these traitors.

GOD BLESS PRESIDENT BUSH and his team!

181 posted on 11/17/2004 5:21:48 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DHerion

"By the way, Osama Bin Laden's anger towards us was our presence in Saudi Arabia."

True. And our troops were in Saudi because of the crap Saddam was pulling.


182 posted on 11/17/2004 5:23:39 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
You actually believe lefty propaganda,from Clintonistas,instead of the eye witness reports from General Tommy Franks?

"Truth"....truth from someone who thinks that OBL is a terrific person? What "truth" is that? "HURT"? Yeah.....actual TRUTH is hurting this jackass and the rest of the cretins,such as Clarke,who have been attempting to make President Bush look bad.

183 posted on 11/17/2004 5:29:04 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

We've all heard this list before; what's new here is a senior U.S. counterterrorism official agreeing that the demands included on it can and should be met. Yet so Scheuer does: "We can either reaffirm current policies, thereby denying their role in creating the hatred bin Laden personifies, or we can examine and debate the reality we face, the threat we must defeat, and then — if deemed necessary — devise policies that better suit U.S. interests."

What do all three of these accomplishments have in common? Very simple: They could potentially offend an important section of Muslim opinion. It would seem that the former head of the CIA's bin Laden unit would regard the actual capture of bin Laden as the most catastrophic possible defeat of all.


http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/frum200411161511.asp


184 posted on 11/17/2004 5:33:01 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
"Everything is biased."

There are degrees and NPR is very biased. When a news source becomes propaganda, as NPR is, then the effort made to filter out the BS is not worth the nuggets of information that may be detected.

You seem to have swallowed this Scheuer crap hook line and sinker.
185 posted on 11/17/2004 5:36:50 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

NO..........the total silence,of supposed "moderate" Muslims is the problem;as well as their bizarre demand that Israel should be handed over to the Plais!


186 posted on 11/17/2004 5:41:01 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
"The problem is with a minority of fanatics on both sides."

Oh really? Do Israeli fanatics deliberately murder women and children?
187 posted on 11/17/2004 5:41:46 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
"the settlements in the west bank."

The settlements in the west bank are not going anywhere. They are part of Israel by right of conquest.
188 posted on 11/17/2004 5:43:57 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
"You are quite good at taking things completely out of context."

What part of "if" don't you understand?
189 posted on 11/17/2004 5:45:09 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
"Yes, this is exactly what needs to be done as well as the settlements in the west bank."

You are taking the European view of this, not the Floridian view.
190 posted on 11/17/2004 5:46:44 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
"REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS"? Such as being worse than modern day Quislings and Chamberlains?

The world ignore Hitler's early wee adventure,assuming incorrectly,that he'd stop after gobbling up a few countries,that most other nations didn't give a damn about. So now,NOW, we should have given in to OBL and allow the destruction of Israel,his take over of ALL Muslim nations,imagining,INCORRECTLY,that his complete intent and purposes aren't really TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD,making it one Islamonazi caliphate?

You really don't understand any of this!

191 posted on 11/17/2004 5:47:51 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

Nooooooooooooo...the "Muslim's feelings",has been one of absolute HATRED for Israel and the Jews,since Israel became a Jewish state! They've HATED everyone and everyone,who has EVER supported Israel's right to be.


192 posted on 11/17/2004 5:50:46 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways

"It would seem that the former head of the CIA's bin Laden unit would regard the actual capture of bin Laden as the most catastrophic possible defeat of all."

http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/frum200411161511.asp


193 posted on 11/17/2004 5:52:57 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

That hasn't worked out too well,now has it? LOL


194 posted on 11/17/2004 5:53:10 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined
Oh really? Do Israeli fanatics deliberately murder women and children?

Yes, they do. Need I bring up Baruch Goldstein?

195 posted on 11/17/2004 5:57:41 PM PST by killjoy (I'm John Kerry and I'm relieved of duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Its pretty obvious that the CIA is shot through with incompetants who feed at the government trough and then undermine those they are responsible to.

That Valeria Plume "kerfuffle" is another good example. A Bill Clinton group that just made one mistake - they didn't get John F-ing Kerry elected with their leaks and now they will pay the price.


196 posted on 11/17/2004 5:59:15 PM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Nooooooooooooo...the "Muslim's feelings",has been one of absolute HATRED for Israel and the Jews,since Israel became a Jewish state! They've HATED everyone and everyone,who has EVER supported Israel's right to be.

Please explain why you have Muslims in Jews living in peace all over Israel? Ever been there?

P.S. Muslims serve in the Israeli Military right next to Jews.

197 posted on 11/17/2004 5:59:33 PM PST by killjoy (I'm John Kerry and I'm relieved of duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

"Of course, but this is a tangent and not what we were talking about."

It is exactly what we are talking about. The Muslims are great at acting like beasts, murdering innocents in their thousands, and then turning around and acting like the aggrieved party when folks get ticked off at them. I refuse to appease them by even considering their demands so long as they use terrorism as an instrument of political power.

Screw the Muslims and the Arabs and what they do and do not want. The Nazis and the Japanese were a far more formidable foe than are the Muslims. We must fight them and defeat them utterly, no matter what the cost and no matter how long it takes. Radical Islam is at least as vile and pernicious a political philosophy as Nazism and Fascism.


198 posted on 11/17/2004 5:59:47 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I believe that General Franks changed our operational game plan after Tora Bora, as evidenced by Operation Anaconda, demonstrating the value of After Action Reviews.

And to mischaracterize Scheuer's statements on Bin Laden as you are doing does nothing to advance your position any place it may matter.

If you want to characterize our war against Bin Laden thus far as being perfection embodied, then have fun.

If, on the other hand, you view it as being imperfect, with room both for constructive criticism of past actions and an opportunity to apply lessons learned towards future operations, then I'd be happy to discuss matters with you.

199 posted on 11/17/2004 6:00:41 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

And you are hold up Operation Anaconda as a success? How many high level Taliban and al-Qaida did the operation capture or kill?

Since Operation Anaconda did not capture any high level Taliban or al-Qaida it shows that using American troops in similar conditions in Tora Bora would not have been successful. You have illustrated the folly of your position.


200 posted on 11/17/2004 6:10:21 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson