Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Discovery Of Real-Time Natural Gas Formation Offers Prospect For Renewable Energy Resource
Space Daily ^ | November 17, 2004 | SPX

Posted on 11/17/2004 10:25:10 AM PST by cogitator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Go ahead, pull my finger. (Demonstration of real-time natural gas formation.)
1 posted on 11/17/2004 10:25:12 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Boot Hill

Ping!


2 posted on 11/17/2004 10:27:37 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

If someone can perfect a methane powered car, we will serve beans and rice, cabbage and noodles and broccoli before every trip back home to Cleveland!


3 posted on 11/17/2004 10:29:53 AM PST by netmilsmom (Zell on DEM Christianity, "They can hum the tune, but can't sing the song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

35 years ago there was a Scandinavian fellow who asserted that oil and gas were not from dead dinosaurs but were from ongoing biological activity in the lower crust. My college housemate at the time was studying this stuff (later worked in the oil industry and became a state geologist in an oil state). The theory wasn't well received - he was basically looked on as a Chariots-of-the-Gods-type nut. More and more recent evidence seems to be suggesting he was right. For the life of me, though, I can't recall his name.


4 posted on 11/17/2004 10:30:29 AM PST by Paine in the Neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Can't drill there, we'd be killing those precious coal-eating microbes.


5 posted on 11/17/2004 10:31:00 AM PST by agooga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop

enery alternative ping


6 posted on 11/17/2004 10:36:47 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop

ENERGY (sp) alternative ping


7 posted on 11/17/2004 10:37:10 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Wow, how can I buy shares??


8 posted on 11/17/2004 10:37:45 AM PST by dg62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

This may sound strange, considering that I was 10 at the time, but I do remember my Dad talking about that theory.

He was a Science nut and read tons. He told me that he felt that in his lifetime he would see cars powered by something other than gasoline. Pitifully he only lived until 1982. He would be geeked out about this find.


9 posted on 11/17/2004 10:39:33 AM PST by netmilsmom (Zell on DEM Christianity, "They can hum the tune, but can't sing the song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Can anyone help me out and explain the difference between methane and propane?

I thought natural gas = propane. The article talks about methane though.

Thanks!


10 posted on 11/17/2004 10:41:54 AM PST by Rammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
LUCA has shown that radio-labeled CO2 (carbon dioxide) introduced to these PWB core samples is converted to radio-labeled methane.

Interesting, and potetially devistating to the Man-made Global Warming Junk Science Industry.

But curious minds want to know what happens to convert CO2 into CH4. Where's the O go and where the H come from?

Any chemists on board?

11 posted on 11/17/2004 10:42:49 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

---maybe Tom Gold?


12 posted on 11/17/2004 10:44:05 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck
Thomas Gold links
13 posted on 11/17/2004 10:48:15 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rammer

no prob...

All of the petroleum gases are "Natural gas".
Methane = CH4
Propane = C4H8 (or is it C3H6, cant remember.)

For the record, natural gas in your house is mostly methane, if not all. Other gases have higher heating values and may be added to increase the heat value. Propane that you buy in bottles for your grill is all propane. Also, the gases are odorless. The smell is a leak detector added.

I currently work in the PRB as an engineer and can tell you that there is not a lower impact on the environment natural resource that I can think of. Now if only Montana would let us drill.


14 posted on 11/17/2004 10:49:54 AM PST by Illuminatas (When I go to Boulder, I like to smoke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rammer
Can anyone help me out and explain the difference between methane and propane?

Methane is CH4, with the single carbon atom bonded by its 4 covalent bonds to 4 hydrogen atoms.

Ethane is C2H6, with two carbon atoms bonded together and the remain 3 electrons on each carbon bonded to three hyrdogen atoms.

Propane is C3H8, with the three carbon atoms bonded together and the remaining 8 bonds bound to hydrogen atoms.

Butane is C4H10. Since you can hook 4 carbons together in many different ways, there are many different isomers of Butane.

Pentane is C5H12. Isomers here, too.

Etc.

15 posted on 11/17/2004 10:50:12 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rammer
Can anyone help me out and explain the difference between methane and propane? I thought natural gas = propane. The article talks about methane though. Thanks!

Methane = CH4, propane = C3H8. Here's a detailed discussion:

http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/PDF/NASA-96-tp3572.pdf

16 posted on 11/17/2004 10:50:30 AM PST by Johnny Crab (Always thankful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Possibly like this:

CO2 + 2H2O = CH4 + 2O2


17 posted on 11/17/2004 10:52:17 AM PST by Illuminatas (When I go to Boulder, I like to smoke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

This would also explain the oil fields that were thought to have been empty suddenly being able to produce again.


18 posted on 11/17/2004 10:52:43 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck
You may be thinking of Prof. Thomas Gold. This reference may be of interest to you.
19 posted on 11/17/2004 10:53:00 AM PST by Moosilauke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

This is NOT good at all. We will now have to find some other way to insist that people change their habits and submit to a global socialist command economy.


20 posted on 11/17/2004 10:56:29 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson