Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 13)
11-15-04 | Always Right

Posted on 11/15/2004 3:51:39 AM PST by Always Right

Our Resolve:

Whereas, liberal Senator Arlen Specter is in line to be Chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

Whereas, liberal Arlen Specter has a stated litmus test against pro-life judges.

Whereas, liberal Arlen Specter has stated he will fight against conservative judges

Whereas, in the past liberal Arlen Specter has helped defeat great judges like Robert Bork,

Whereas, the Democrats have loaded the Judiciary Committee with extreme liberals such as Kennedy, Feinstein, Leahy, and Schumer.

Whereas, liberal Arlen Specter is in a position to turn our huge and historic election victory into a defeat by killing the nomination of all decent judges,

Be it resolved, that we will do whatever it takes to get liberal Arlen Specter off the Judiciary Committee!

Updates:

11-15 Update: Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist withheld offering any support Specter and raised the bar for supporting Specter.  Frist stated, "I would expect Chairman Specter to go one step further — if it's Chairman Specter, whoever that chairman is — and that is to have a strong predisposition to supporting that nominee sent over by President Bush.I see this as a huge as Specter will not be able to say this and not meet Frist's criteria.  So by the criteria established by the Senate leader, Specter can not be confirmed as chairman of the Judiciary.

We are making progress!  I see this as a major step as Frist is signaling that Specter is not the right man for the job.  Keep up the pressure, especially on the judiciary member.  Specter will be taking to all of these members, pleading his case.  These are the men who will decide Specter's fate in early January.

Hypocrite Lugar supports Specter:  In an odd development, Senator Lugar stated his support for Specter becoming chairman mainly because of GOP Senate rules.  Lugar stated, "If Republicans decide they want to change of all them, that's a different situation."  However in 1986, Lugar did not let these rules stop him from challenging Sen. Jesse Helms for the chairman's job on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.  Lugar lost badly to the more senior Helms who was in line for the job.  I suggest Sen. Lugar go back to making sound bites for Sen. Kerry to use against the President....

Other Freeper efforts relating to this:

BE A FILIBUSTER BUSTER - we can stop the filibuster of nominees RIGHT NOW

NYC BREAKING: Freep Specter Monday! (5:15 pm, outside of Grand Hyatt Hotel 42nd st (btwn Park/Lex))

11-12 thru 11-14 Update:  I will be out of town this weekend and unable to update until Sunday evening.  The significant development is that insiders are saying Craig is considering challenger Specter for the Chairmanship.  This is great news, we need to encourage Senator Craig.  I think if Craig starts to indicate he is going to challenge, Kyl will step up and challenge.  Senator Kyl is next in line after Specter for the job, and doesn't want someone to leapfrog over him.  So encourage both of these men to challenge.  I think one of them will.  Keep this thread bumped and have a great weekend!

11-11 Update:  Happy Veterans Day!  New reports indicate that Chairmen will not be confirmed until after the New Senate is sworn in on January 4th.  This contradicts earlier information I provided off of Concerned Women for America's website.  But NEXT WEEK will be the pivot point in this whole situation.  Specter is going to meet with the other GOP committee members and make his plea in person.  If the other committee members do not offer public support after that meeting, that will be a real bad sign for Specter.  Keep up the heat, these committee members need to know that Specter is UNACCEPTABLE.  Senator Cornyn may be slipping to the dark side, so he may need a few extra calls.

Tort Reform Dead?  According to today's Washington Times, with Sen. John Edwards on his way out, Arlen Specter is the favorite senator of the trial lawyers. Tort reform is near the top of the president's priority list, but one staff attorney on the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over tort law, told this writer, "tort reform is dead if Specter is chairman."

Specter Delirious?  Yesterdays's Philadelphia Inquirer, "It's been difficult for pro-choice Republicans in the Senate because there are so few of us," Specter continued. Though more than half of Republicans say they support abortion rights, with some limitations, "that branch of the party has never been vocal," he added.  Abortion-rights groups identify five GOP senators, of 55 in the new Congress, who have records supporting abortion rights.  - (I guess fewer than 10% is close to more than half.  Sometimes Specter does not seem to know when to shut up...note according to this, there are 50 pro-life GOP Senators!)

Sen. Cornyn leaning towards Supporting Specter?  "I have a responsibility to them to tell them this is why I voted to support Senator Specter's chairmanship," Mr. Cornyn said. If those things happen, "I think he is likely to be confirmed," the Texan said.  (Not a good sign coming from Cornyn).

11-10 Update:  The media is trying to tell us that the outrage over Specter's arrogant threat is dying down.  However, inside reports are telling us Senate staffers are still busy full time answering anti-Specter callers.  Phone lines are busy and angry voters are having a difficult time getting through.  Ignoring the media spin, the outrage isn't about to die.  It is important to note that NOT ONE member of the Senate Judiciary Committee has come out in support of Specter.  Senator Cornyn, Kyl, and Graham have expressed serious concern, and are waiting to see how it plays out.  Believe me, these Senators share our same concerns and the Phone Calls are having an impact!  If one Senator is going to come to Specter's defense, it will likely be Senator Hatch.  Outside of Hatch, I don't anticipate Specter getting too much support.  Specter is not out of hot water yet and we are not about to turn down the heat. 

Thomas Sowell:  "It would be a tragedy for him to become chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he could mangle nominees, and in the process mangle the Constitution of the United States."

6 More Years?: Specter defenders are saying Specter will be a good soldier and if he does screw up we will oust him.  But how?  Once Specter is in, he is in.  Senate leadership isn't going to pull some unprecedented and undefined action to remove Specter.  Specter will be Chairman for the next 6 years assuming the GOP controls the Senate.  Bank on it.  Now Specter may play good soldier for a year, maybe two.  But what about years 3, 4, 5, and 6?  Specter is going to go back to his old self, there can be no doubt.  Is the smooth sailing in the short term really worth it?  I think the balance of the Supreme Court will be decided in those later years when we will see the real Arlen.  Is the short-term fix worth the long term risk?

Specter Still Not in the Clear:  Fox News story and video!  Fox did a story on the hundreds of web based efforts to stop Specter.  If you watch the video, the second site that is flashed up is FreeRepublic!  According to the video, the White House is not going to help Specter, but leave it all up to Specter.  The effort to stop Specter is still going strong!

11-9 Update:  The response to this effort has been extraordinary.  Senators have reported they have been getting more calls about Specter than anything this year with the exception of gay marriage.  Don't be discouraged by speculation from talking heads or people are fearful of backlash.  There is a process for selecting the chairman and the process is just getting started.  I fully expect the initial selection to follow protocol and select Specter.  The GOP leadership will leave it up to the members of the Judiciary to make a switch.  On November 17th, the GOP judiciary members get to decide if one of them is going to challenge Specter.  Even if none of them decide to challenge in an open vote in committee, it still has to be confirmed by the whole GOP caucus.  If 11 Senators decide they want a closed vote on the Chairmen selection, they will have a closed vote and Specter can be thrown out at that time.  Any talk that someone knows how this process will play out is total BS.  Keep up the pressure! They are conservative Senators out there that will make a stand.

The GOP leadership seems to be taking a stand that they are going to leave it up to the Judiciary Committee members.  For those who claim it is a done deal, let's see where they stand:

Sen. Cornyn:  "We'll have to see where he (Specter) stands."

Sen. Jeff Sessions:  Was a judge 'borked' by Specter from the federal bench back in the Reagan era.  Likely would oppose Specter given an opportunity.

Sen. Graham:  "The original comments attributed to Senator Specter were very unnerving…. His statement clarifying his position is reassuring, and I hope we will work our way through this."

Sen. Kyl:  Indicated in an interview he would be the one to challenge Specter, but will have to wait to see what happens.  Said the calls to his office were about 1000-1 against Specter.

This doesn't sound like a done deal.  Keep up the Pressure folks!

11-8 Update:  We are in a critical week.  A fellow Freeper has informed me that there will be LOTS of activity this week. The Committee on Committees will be formed and important committee assignments will be made.  There will be one or two new spots on the Judicial Committee for the GOP.  These spots must be filled by rock solid conservatives.  Frisk of course will be a key player here, and so will Senator Kyl.  E-mail and fax them and tell them the kind of committee members we need.  They will also make initial selections on who the committee chairmen will be.  I assume they will follow the seniority rules, but they probably don't have to. 

*****URGENT:  Things are happening now!  Committee assignments, initial Chairman selections.  Keep Sen. Frist and Sen. Kyl informed that we want Conservative appointments on Judiciary and no Arlen Specter.

Karl Rove's Comments:  "What I do know is that he told the president that, if he, Senator Specter, were to become chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that every one of the president's nominees would receive a prompt hearing, a vote in the committee within a reasonable period of time, and that his appellate nominees would all be brought to the floor for an up-or-down decision on the floor. And we're in — Senator Specter's a man of his word, and we'll take him at his word if he becomes chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

One thing to note, Rove said 'if' not once, but twice!  Something tells me Specter is not out of the woods.  However, Rove and Bush seem to put too much faith in Arlen Specter's word.  But  which Arlen is telling the truth, the one who promised Bush or the one who promised his liberal media friends that none of Bush's extremist judges would be approved to the Bench?

My Question:  Why is Specter, a man who opposes everything the GOP stands for on judicial nominations, even on the Judicial Committee????  It really makes no sense. 

James Dobson:  "There are many, many members of that committee that are more qualified and less of a problem than Senator Specter....He is a problem, and he must be derailed."

Once each committee selects their Chairman, all GOP Senators vote up or down on these Chairmen in a closed vote.  Details on when this happens are not known.  It is important to contact your GOP Senator's office and voice your opposition to Specter.  They will get to vote on it!

Keep up the Good Work:  We are being heard!  Numerous stories out there prove that we are making a difference. 

Grassley somewhat defends Specter:  Grassley came out yesterday and told us we don't need to worry about Specter.  Not exactly a strong endorsement.  His reason, "you know, he led the fight to confirm Justice Thomas, and he's been behind all of the President's appointments the last four years."  Really?  Specter hindered the nomination of Leon Holmes and expressed serious doubts about him.  Specter's position meant that Holmes went up for a vote without a recommendation from the Judiciary Committee.  And for Justice Thomas, Specter supported Thomas out of political necessity.  Specter was taking a beating for what he did to Robert Bork and was facing a tough re-election.  Specter was forced to redeem himself or would have been  voted out of office.  Specter is not a wild card here, even before last's week press conference where Specter warned Bush about his nominees, Specter has made in position clear during this election.  Seeking Post-Gazette's endorsement, Specter went to their editorial board, and promised that no extremists would be approved for the bench.  Extremist judges in Specter language are those like Scalia.

Watch out for Specter:  Specter knows he is in trouble.  Specter is going on the talk show circuit to make his case.  Don't buy into his BS.  Specter will point out that he has supported Bush's nominees.  He voted for Thomas.  He voted for Scalia.  Of course, so did Senator Kerry and 96 other Senators.  Like Senator Kerry, Specter wants to maintain the liberal balance on the court.  They will only support a conservative judge if it does not threaten Roe v. Wade.  Senator Specter says he doesn't have a litmus test.  But just ask Specter what he would do if the court were divided 5-4 on abortion.  I am 100% convinced Specter would pull out any and all stops to make sure a pro-abortion judge is appointed.  The more I learn about Specter, the more I see that protecting Roe v. Wade is his number one priority.  This is why Specter will do and say ANYTHING to get the Judiciary Chairman assignment.  Specter is a snake, when he goes to pat you on the back watch out for the knife in his hand.  Specter flat out hates social conservatives and 'strict constructionist' judges.  Specter is a 'living document' guy.

Ann Coulter was Right:  Back in April, Ann warned us that the election between Toomey and Specter was the second most important election of the year.  In hindsight, it must be concluded that Ann was dead on.  Specter was worthless in helping Bush carry Pennsylvania, but now will be a big thorn in our side on getting judicial nominees confirmed.

Allies:

Thomas Sowell

Laura Ingraham

Grassroots.PA

Coalition for a Fair Judiciary

Stop Specter Now!

National Right to Life Committee

NRO - The Corner

The Conservative Voice

Focus on the Family

Confused Conservatives:

Hugh Hewitt

Petitions on the Web:

We Want a Strong Leader on the Senate Judiciary Committee - GOPUSA

"New Pro-Abortion Senate Judiciary Chair?" - Voices Heard

Arlen Specter MUST NOT become Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. - nospecter

Pull chair out from under RINO Arlen Specter - Conservative Petitions

 Petition to Republican Senators Opposing the Election of Senator Arlen Specter - AFA

THE FAIR JUDICIARY OATH - Coalition for Fair Judiciary

On-line Petition - gopwing.com

Latest News Stories:

NEW! Pro-choice Specter faces GOP test Chicago Trib 11-15

NEW! Frist withholds Specter support Washington Times, 11-15

NEW! NY Times: Frist Sees Hurdles for Specter NYT 11-14

NEW! For Specter, a Showdown Over Judiciary Chairmanship Washington Post 11-14

The Specter Campaign National Review 11-11

Focus on the Family ups effort to block Specter Rocky Mountain News 11-11

Embattled Specter upset at HRC snub NY Blade 11-12

As Specter seeks a chairmanship, it's payback time for conservatives Phily Inquirer 11-12

An ominous Specter: Part III Thomas Sowell 11-12

Specter's voting record Washington Times, 11-11

Specter asks to appeal to peers  AP via Washington Times 11-11

Specter sees 'a battle for balance in the Republican Party' Philly Inquirer 11-11

An ominous Specter: Part II Thomas Sowell 11-10

Specter Seeks Meeting with Fellow Republicans  - Reuters 11-10

An ominous Specter - Thomas Sowell 11-10

Specter Still Not in the Clear - Fox News 11-9

Spat over Specter may be subsiding - Pittsburg Post-Gazette 11-9

Conservatives target Specter - Washington Times 11-9

 GOP Senators Struggle with Specter Chairmanship Focus on the Family 11-9

 Under Fire, Specter Gets Only Tepid White House Support NY Times 11-9

Why the Specter flap matters - Boston Globe 11-9

The Left's View on Specter - Limbaugh 11-9

Specter Campaign Crumbling - Human Events 11-8

Senate Chairmanship in Question for Specter - NPR 11-8

Specter blunders on Roe vs. Wade - Chicago Tribune (Novak) 11-8

Specter Opponents Pressing Senate Leaders - AP 11-8

A Specter of Trouble - OpinionEditorials 11-8

Specter: "I not only voted against Bork, I led the charge aGrassroots PAgainst him." - Grassroots.PA 11-7

Specter says he won't slow anti-abortion court nominees - CNN 11-7

Arlen Specter - "Bork" Him - Intellectual Conservative 11-6

Judges Following No Law (why Arlen Specter must go) - ****Robert Bork, 8-12-04

Keep Arlen Specter off chair of Judiciary Committee! - WND 11-6

Who's spinning? Specter or reporter? - WND 11-5

All eyes on Sen. Specter - Washington Times 11-5

Conservative wing raises fuss over Specter's views - New York Times 11-5

Specter faces battle for Judiciary chair - Washington Times 11-5

Sen. Specter Ignites Firestorm of Opposition - NewsMax 11-5

Suffering Specter - Pittsburg Tribune Review 11-5

Specter's Remarks Trigger Protest - Focus on the Family 11-5

Lawmaker wants Grassley on judiciary panel - Des Moines Register 11-5

Specter 'Borked' Himself from Senate Judiciary Committee - Concerned Women for America 11-5

Pro-Life Pray-In Planned to Stop Specter - CNSNEWS 11-5

Will Specter Chair Judiciary? - Human Events 11-5

Thank You, Arlen - National Review 11-3

GOP Sen. Specter Vows to Block Bush's Nominees - NewsMax 10-29

The Northeastern Liberal (Kerry and Specter, two peas in a pod.) - Evan-Novak 3-11-04

Background:

Actual Transcript of News Conference Wherein Specter Threatens Bush's Judicial Nominees

Specter's "Clarification" of his Threats to Pres. Bush's Judicial Nominees

Another Soros Specter Connection (The Bush-Soros Pick)

SPECTER SLAMS CONSERVATIVES IN CAMPAIGN LETTER, ATTACKS PRO-LIFERS, CHRISTIANS

Senate Judiciary Committee .

Contact Information:

Bill Frist:  E-mail:  senator.frist@senate.gov
461 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON DC 20510
PHONE: (202) 224-3344
Web Form (Email his office): http://www.frist.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=AboutSenatorFrist.ContactForm

Contact Information for all Senators

Sen. Orrin Hatch, UT, current Committee Chair PH: 202-224-5251 FX: 202-224-6331

Sen. Jon Kyl, AZ PH: 202-224-4521 FX: 202-224-2207

Sen. John Cornyn, TX PH: 202-224-2934 FX: 202-228-2856

Sen. Charles Grassley, IA PH: 202-224-3744 FX: 319-363-7179

Sen. Mike DeWine, OH PH: 202-224-2315 FX: 202-224-6519

Sen. Jeff Sessions, AL PH: 202-224-4124 FX: 202-224-3149

Sen. Lindsey Graham, SC PH: 202-224-5972 FX: 202-224-3808

Sen. Larry Craig, ID PH: 202-224-2752 FX: 202-228-1067

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, GA PH: 202-224-3521 FX: 202-224-0103

Homepages of Judiciary Committe Members:

Orrin Hatch   Chuck Grassley     Jon Kyl    Mike DeWine    Jeff Sessions     Lindsey Graham    Larry Craig    Saxby Chambliss    John Cornyn    Arlen Specter

Media Contacts:
Special@foxnews.com; rush@eibnet.com; hannity@foxnews.com; editor@weeklystandard.com; beltwayboys@foxnews.com; tblankley@washingtontimes.com; jmccaslin@washingtontimes.com; gpierce@washingtontimes.com; jseper@washingtontimes.com; Templar119@aol.com; malkin@comcast.net; letters@charleskrauthammer.com; ben@cspc.org; adams_mike@hotmail.com; ballen@t3energy.com; greg@therightbalance.org; VAlpher@aol.com; friends@atr.org; ruddy@spectator.org; editor@spectator.org; rjbacak@sbcglobal.net; online.editors@barrons.com; me@glennbeck.com; carol@carolbernhard.com; jennifer.biddison@heritage.org; kotta@foxnews.com; briankbodine@yahoo.com; jimbohannon@1050wevd.com; JeffBolton@woai.com; wackerma@bowdoin.edu; chrisb@unt.edu; erniebrown@americaatnight.com; bucc@bucknellconservatives.org; calpundit@cox.net; chairman@cyr.org; joshcampbell@mail.utexas.edu; info@capitolhillblue.com; castellanopj@earthlink.net; charles@littlegreenfootballs.com; bobcole@clearchannel.com; cn@isi.org; letters@commentarymagazine.com; lauren.conner@bba02.bus.utexas.edu; dj@flipsideshow.com; copleyd@wharton.upenn.edu; tom@anncoulter.org; info@collegegop.org; cugop@colorado.edu; crider@mail.utexas.edu;
hill2@cp.chemeketa.edu; j0annaz@yahoo.com; rcuster@yaf.org; pundit@dailypundit.com; lukerval@hotmail.com; davidson@collegegop.org; txtau@yahoo.com; holiday.dmitri@foxnews.com; sara@studentsforacademicfreedom.org; larry@larryelder.com; tpelia@yahoo.com; elizabeth@cspc.org; cfennell@ucsd.edu; mfinch@cspc.org; sarahfloerke@mail.com; rforest@ev1.net; rachelzfriedman@yahoo.com; mike@mikeonline.com; cdganske@yahoo.com; bubbgarcia@yahoo.com; ggermany@austin.rr.com; presACG@aol.com; lynn.gibson@heritage.org; giselarm@san.rr.com; jglazov@rogers.com; fgonzalez@isi.org; opeds@gopusa.com; redshift_7@yahoo.com; MJGriffing@hotmail.com; frn@freeper.org; bac@compuserve.com; michaelh@ductape.net; Hannity@aol.com; khart@crnc.org; johnhawkins@rightwingnews.com; roger@rogerhedgecock.com; jchenry_628@mail.utexas.edu; hhewitt@hughhewitt.com; holco004@mailhost1.csusm.edu; suggestions@lauraingraham.com; pundit@instapundit.com; feedback@intellectualconservative.com; Rollye@rollye.net; calidawl217@yahoo.com; niucrchair@yahoo.com; amw@judgemendozawaterhouse.com; rdj@mail.utexas.edu; gk3385@yahoo.com; kfir@protestwarrior.com; kinghorn1836@yahoo.com; becky@becky4congress.com; pklinkne@hamilton.edu; dks@wava.com; comments.kurtz@nationalreview.com; JCL159522@yahoo.com; lars@larslarson.com; mark@marklarson.com; jleo@usnews.com; binghamtonreview@yahoo.com
 

Previous Threads:

Priority 1: Remove Specter from Judiciary (Thread 1)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judciary (Day 2)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 3)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 4)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 5)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 6)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 7)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 8)

Priority 1:  Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Day 9)

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judiciary (Days 10-12)

 

Specter = Kerry (from 'The Northeast Liberal' - Evans-Novak)

VS. BORK

The Kerry-Specter alliance began with a bang, voting against the Bork nomination. But here, no one can accuse Specter of following Kerry. No, Specter was the point man in sinking Bork. Bork's handler, Tom Korologos, credits Specter with the "game-winning RBI" in sinking the conservative nominee.

Bork's approach to reading the Constitution was too "narrow," and Bork didn't appreciate it as "a living, growing document" in Specter's words. Don't forget this is the man in line to chair the Judiciary Committee next year.

VS. PARENTAL NOTIFICATION


In 1990, Specter joined Kerry in opposing parental notification for minors' abortions. This was not a vote requiring parental consent, merely notification. Not only that, this was not a broad regulation on abortions, it was a condition on federally appropriated money.

Yes, Democrats were sending tax dollars to abortion clinics, and Republicans wanted to add a condition to that money. If an abortionist wanted to abort a minor's unborn child without the parents' knowledge, he could reject the federal funding.

One more detail: the notification rule was waived in the case of "medical emergencies," a broad term which went largely undefined. Still, Kerry and Specter agreed that this was too restrictive. Taxpayer funding for abortionists ought to come with no strings attached, the two concurred.

VS. DEFENSE SPENDING

Specter and Kerry were both in the minorities of their respective parties in voting to slash defense spending by $3.1 billion in 1991. Specter was one of three Republicans to support this amendment.

Neither Senator could point to deficit reduction as their rationale-the bill simply shifted the money to domestic federal programs.

VS. SCHOOL CHOICE

In January of 1992, Kerry and Specter teamed up on the first two contested votes of the session. First, on a non-binding resolution, they joined in support of Supreme Court rulings banning voluntary prayer in school.

Then, on the fifth roll-call vote of the year, Kerry and Specter helped defeat a pilot program for school choice for poor families only. The provision came with authorization of new funds, and so it could not be accused of draining the public schools.

VS. TORT REFORM

Specter and Kerry are two of the favorites of the trial lawyer lobby for a reason. The RNC drew out of Kerry's past a 1995 vote where he and Specter helped defeat a measure that would have capped punitive damages on medical-malpractice and product-liability cases at two times the compensatory damages. This is not a hard cap at all because compensatory damages would not be capped.

On that same day, the two voted hand-in-hand a number of times against the GOP leadership to protect the lawyers.

VS. RESPONSIBLY BUDGETTING

This 1997 GOP-sponsored budget resolution combined spending cuts with tax cuts for net deficit reduction. Thirteen other Republicans voted no, but those were the likes of Phil Gramm and Jesse Helms, who objected that the budget was too large. Specter's objections were far closer to those of Kerry.

VS. CLONING BAN

Almost precisely five years to the day before scientists first made and killed a human life through cloning, John Kerry and Arlen Specter voted to kill a bill that would have banned human cloning in the U.S.

VS. TAX REDUCTION

While they couldn't defeat the $792 billion tax cut on Capitol Hill (during a time of budget surplus in 1999), Kerry and Specter provided enough support to President Clinton to sustain his veto. Specter was one of only two Republicans to join Kerry and the Democrats. Even Jim Jeffords voted Yes.

Specter, of course, changed his tune on tax cuts last year (during a time of budget deficts), when Pat Toomey announced his primary challenge.

VS. EXPANDING HATE-CRIME PROTECTIONS

Not only did Kerry and Specter agree in 2000 that crimes against homosexuals or bisexuals should be treated differently than crimes against heterosexuals, they both decided that a defense bill was the appropriate place to push their discriminatory federal power grab.

VS. SHRINKING TAX CUT

Finally, Specter was one of four Republicans to vote to shrink Bush's tax cut. The amendment passed with 53 votes. Very simply, this means that your taxes are higher now because of liberal Republicans such as Arlen Specter.

George W. Bush thinks he can win Pennsylvania. He seems to think having Arlen Specter on the ticket below him will help. Trying to convince voters to vote for Bush and Specter will be a tough row to hoe, especially when it comes to explaining his positions on taxes, cloning, school choice, the life of the unborn, and the direction of the federal courts. Kerry and Specter would be the more natural pair for voters to choose.

Pennsylvania Republicans have a chance this April 27 to help the Bush campaign in the Keystone State have a clear coherent message on life, the strength of the military, and federal budget.

Otherwise, Bush will need to explain why Kerry's positions the wrong ones for a president to take, but just dandy for a senator.

 


TOPICS: Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: stockpirate

It is not a matter of lacking votes. It is a matter of if a chairman decides a vote is not going to happen, it does not happen.


41 posted on 11/15/2004 11:38:42 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

My point was when they reconfigure the committee the Democrats won't have the votes to make him chairman, it would be 10-9 if he voted with them.


42 posted on 11/15/2004 12:41:23 PM PST by stockpirate (Tagline is hung over from the election parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; All

I'm going to the NYC FReep! (My first one!) I'm so excited!!! Gotta run!


43 posted on 11/15/2004 12:47:22 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (Specter needs to see a 3-D sonogram image.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Yes but, Specter as Chairman can unilaterally hold the nominees in committee if he really desires. He doesn't need any help.


44 posted on 11/15/2004 12:49:08 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Great. Report back and tell us all about it.


45 posted on 11/15/2004 12:50:44 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

This is from www.StopSpecterNow.com:


"Things are really looking up for us! A recent AP article pointed out that Frist told Arlen he has a responsibility "to the feelings, the wishes, the beliefs, the values, the procedures that are held by the majority of that committee." This is the begining of the end for Snarlin' Arlen as even his Senate buddies abandon him. But we must keep up the heat, as Specter will be meeting with the members of the judiciary committee TOMMOROW. Please call all the offices listed on this page and let them know we won't stand for LIBERAL Arlen Specter chairing the Judiciary Committee. Arlen is bad on taxes, tort reform, life issues, stem cells, and even on defending out troops. (He supported subjecting US troops to an International Criminal Court). So make the calls and make a DIFFERENCE!

If you do just these four things between now and tommorow afternoon it WILL make the difference.

1. Call all the members and their district offices
2. Fax the members
3. Call into conservative talk shows and tell them how important it is to stop this
4. Forward this e-mail and our website along to at least 5 friends!"



Orrin G. Hatch
CHAIRMAN, UTAH

Tel: (202) 224-5251

Jeff Sessions
ALABAMA

Tel: (202) 224-4124

Charles E. Grassley
IOWA

Tel: (202) 224-3744
Lindsey Graham
SOUTH CAROLINA

Tel: (202) 224-5972

Jon Kyl
ARIZONA

Tel: (202) 224-4521

Larry Craig
IDAHO

Tel: (202) 224-2752

Mike DeWine
OHIO

Tel: (202) 224-2315
Saxby Chambliss
GEORGIA

Tel: (202) 224-3521

John Cornyn
TEXAS

Tel: (202) 224-2934




Bill Frist

Washington, D.C.
Office of Senator Bill Frist, M.D.
461 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-3344
202-228-1264 (fax)

Nashville
28 White Bridge Road
Suite 211
Nashville, TN 37205
615-352-941
615-352-9985 (fax)

Chattanooga
James Building
735 Broad Street, Suite 701
Chattanooga, TN 37402
423-756-2757
423-756-5313 (fax)

Jackson
200 East Main Street
Suite 111
Jackson, TN 38301
731-424-9655
731-424-8322 (fax)

Kingsport/Tri-Cities
10368 Wallace Alley Street
Suite 7
Kingsport, TN 37663
423-323-1252
423-323-0358 (fax)

Knoxville
Twelve Oaks Executive Park
Building One, Suite 170
Knoxville, TN 37919
865-602-7977
865-602-7979 (fax)

Memphis
5100 Poplar Avenue
Suite 514
Memphis, TN 38137
901-683-1910
901-683-3610 (fax) Jeff Sessions

Birmingham
Office of Senator Jeff Sessions
341 Vance Federal Building
1800 Fifth Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2171
(205) 731-1500 - Phone
(205) 731-0221 - Fax

Huntsville
Office of Senator Jeff Sessions
AmSouth Center, Suite 802
200 Clinton Avenue NW
Huntsville, Alabama 35801-4932
(256) 533-0979 - Phone
(256) 533-0745 - Fax

Mobile
Office of Senator Jeff Sessions
41 West I-65 Service Road, Suite 2300-A
Mobile, Alabama 36608-1291
(251) 414-3083 - Phone
(251) 414-5845 - Fax

Montgomery
Office of Senator Jeff Sessions
7550 Halcyon Summit Drive, Suite 150
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
(334) 244-7017 - Phone
(334) 244-7091 Fax

Washington, D.C.
Office of Senator Jeff Sessions
335 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-0104
(202) 224-4124 - Phone
(202) 224-3149 - Fax


Charles Grassley

Cedar Rapids
206 Federal Building
101 1st Street, S.E.
Cedar Rapids, IA 52401
(319) 363-6832
Fax: (319) 363-7179
Council Bluffs
307 Federal Building
8 South 6th Street
Council Bluffs, IA 51501
(712) 322-7103
Fax: (712) 322-7196

Davenport
131 West 3rd Street
Suite 180
Davenport, IA 52801
(563) 322-4331
Fax: (563) 322-8552

Des Moines
721 Federal Building
210 Walnut Street
Des Moines, IA 50309
(515) 288-1145
Fax: (515) 288-5097

Sioux City
103 Federal Building
320 6th Street
Sioux City, IA 51101
(712) 233-1860
Fax: (712) 233-1634

Waterloo
210 Waterloo Building
531 Commercial Street
Waterloo, IA 50701
(319) 232-6657
Fax: (319) 232-9965
Arlen Specter

Allentown Office
Suite 3814, Federal Building
504 W. Hamilton
Allentown, PA 18101
Tel: 610-434-1444
Fax: 610-434-1844

Erie Office
Federal Building, Suite B-120
17 South Park Row
Erie, PA 16501
Tel: 814-453-3010
Fax: 814-455-9925

Harrisburg Office
Room 1104, Federal Building
228 Walnut Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Tel: 717-782-3951
Fax: 717-782-4920

Philadelphia Office
600 Arch Street
Suite 9400
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Tel: 215-597-7200
Fax: 215-597-0406

Pittsburgh Office
Regional Enterprise Tower (old Alcoa Building)
425 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1450
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Tel: 412-644-3400
Fax: 412-644-4871

Scranton Office
310 Spruce Street
Suite 201
Scranton, PA 18503
Tel: 570-346-2006
Fax: 570-346-8499

Wilkes-Barre Office
7 North Wilkes Barre Boulevard
Stegmaier Building, Room 377M
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702
Tel: 570-826-6265
Fax: 570-826-6266

John Kyl

WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE
730 Hart Senate Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4521
Fax: (202) 224-2207

PHOENIX OFFICE
2200 East Camelback, Suite 120
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3455
Phone: (602) 840-1891
Fax: (602) 957-6838

TUCSON OFFICE
7315 North Oracle Road, Suite 220
Tucson, Arizona 85704
Phone: (520) 575-8633
Fax: (520) 797-3232 Mike DeWine

Washington, D.C. Office
140 Russell Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-2315
Fax: (202) 224-6519
TDD: (202) 224-9921

Casework Office:
Senators DeWine and Voinovich
37 West Broad Street, Suite 300
Columbus, OH 43215
Phone: (614) 469-6774
Fax: (614) 469-7419
Casework Hotline: 1-800-205-OHIO

Xenia, Ohio Office:
100 West Main Street
2nd Floor
Xenia, OH 45385
Phone: (937) 376-3080
Fax: (937) 376-3387

Cincinnati, Ohio Office:
312 Walnut St.
Suite 2030
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Phone: (513) 763-8260
Fax: (513) 763-8268

Cleveland, Ohio Office:
600 East Superior Avenue
Room 2450
Cleveland, OH 44114
Phone: (216) 522-7272
Fax: (216) 522-2239

Columbus, Ohio Office:
37 West Broad Street
Suite 300
Columbus, OH 43215
Phone: (614) 469-5186
Fax: (614) 469-2982


Marietta, Ohio Office:
121 Putnam Street
Suite 102
Marietta, OH 45750
Phone: (740) 373-2317
Fax: (740) 373-8689

Toledo, Ohio Office:
420 Madison Avenue, Room 1225
Toledo, OH 43604
Phone: (419) 259-7536
Fax: (419) 259-7575








46 posted on 11/15/2004 12:58:47 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I agree he should not be chairman, if they reconfig, the committee he won't have the votes to get the chair is my point.


47 posted on 11/15/2004 1:25:59 PM PST by stockpirate (Tagline is hung over from the election parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

We shall see. I hope you're right.


48 posted on 11/15/2004 2:03:59 PM PST by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

19 members - 8 dims + Specter + ONE RINO = 10 votes.


49 posted on 11/15/2004 2:08:07 PM PST by orchid (Defeat is worse than death, you have to LIVE with defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: orchid

Of course they would need to not have a RINO on the committee. This is what I have heard it may be handled.


50 posted on 11/15/2004 5:29:00 PM PST by stockpirate (Tagline is hung over from the election parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

I am busy emailing, faxing, and calling them once again. I do it all over every other day or so.


51 posted on 11/15/2004 9:19:25 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

HI there AR!! Have there been any developments today? Did the committee meet with Specter?

I called some of the committee member offices a while ago and hope others are keeping the phone calls and emails going.


52 posted on 11/16/2004 2:16:36 PM PST by TEXOKIE (Father in Heaven, take command of America and her Mission, her leaders, her people, and her troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE
HI there AR!! Have there been any developments today? Did the committee meet with Specter?

Specter met with GOP leaders in the morning and the committee members in the afternoon. They were behind closed doors and nobody is saying what went on. Trent Lott came out in support of Specter after the morning meeting, but not much else is known. Tommorrow they caucus and maybe more information will come out.

53 posted on 11/16/2004 2:58:52 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Thanks!


54 posted on 11/16/2004 3:16:31 PM PST by TEXOKIE (Father in Heaven, take command of America and her Mission, her leaders, her people, and her troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson