Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/14/2004 5:56:01 PM PST by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: hope

Why doesn't steve kroft go catch OBL then, he seems to know all about it.


2 posted on 11/14/2004 5:58:08 PM PST by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

I am really surprised that 60 minutes aired this guy taking it to Clarke and Tenent.

I watched this and I thought it was funny how SM somewhat distorted the timeline to almost make it appear that the CIA dropped the ball during the Bush administration.


3 posted on 11/14/2004 5:58:26 PM PST by Perdogg (W stands for Winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
"They're intention is to end the war as soon as they can and to ratchet up the pain for the Americans until we get out of their region.... If they acquire the weapon, they will use it, whether it's chemical, biological or some sort of nuclear weapon," said Scheuer.

So it wasn't the Russians that started the end of the world?

4 posted on 11/14/2004 5:58:55 PM PST by rocksblues (No more Kerry, no more polls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

His criticism of both Clark and Tenent lends credibility to his comments.


5 posted on 11/14/2004 5:58:59 PM PST by matchwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Am I the only one who thinks that all of this chaos and finger-pointing at the CIA + these nuke warnings that seem to be coming every day now == bad news....

I don't want to panic, but the government has not been very reassuring of late.


6 posted on 11/14/2004 6:00:10 PM PST by TFine80 (Patton's Son: "There's no soap ever been invented that can wash that blood off his hands.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Regarding the headline, what's the big deal? I said that ten years ago.


7 posted on 11/14/2004 6:00:21 PM PST by Petronski (Okay, so today I *am* cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

I see a big gap between 'surely coming' and 'if he gets a weapon, he will use it.'


8 posted on 11/14/2004 6:01:26 PM PST by blanknoone (Victory at Home. Victory Abroad. Who knows, maybe even a victory over our State Dept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
CIA Agent: (WMD).....Nuke Attack Surely Coming

Sad,.....but,........it (WMD-attacks) may be 'bigger' than we can even imagine!

AQ is seeking a world-wide......'stage'.

(to them,...it is a self-saving....of.....'face'...?)

(Their,....'Heavens' must be destroyed?)

/sarcasm

10 posted on 11/14/2004 6:02:07 PM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
It'll be easy to leave when there are only oil pumps pumpin' left over the whole area.

OBL really needs to rethink his wishes.

13 posted on 11/14/2004 6:04:07 PM PST by Paladin2 (SeeBS News - We Decide, We Create, We Report - In that order! - ABC - Already Been Caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

I don't know why folks keep saying that Bin Laden is smart, when it's so apparent that he's either as stupid as a june bug, insane, or both.

He took on the US on 9/11 and lost his entire empire in the Middle East, and he thinks that setting off a nuke will win this war for him? If America's loss of 3,000 people cost him so dearly, what will nuking the states cost him and his beloved Islam?


15 posted on 11/14/2004 6:04:59 PM PST by Noachian (A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

I didn't catch 60 Minutes this evening, but Scheuer makes another important assertion in his book Imperial Hubris: we are not winning the war in Afghanistan nor in Iraq, and we will not win these wars. He says we have lost control of many towns and large regions of both countries, and this will get worse. I hope Scheuer is wrong, but clearly a great deal of persistence will be needed to prove him wrong.


16 posted on 11/14/2004 6:05:02 PM PST by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
Why were there always enough people for the public relations office, for the academic outreach office, for the diversity and multi-cultural office? All those things are admirable and necessary but none of them are protecting the American people from a foreign threat," said Scheuer.

Because smoke over substance went part and parcel with Clintonian policy. Lazy bureaucrats despise an administration that demands results and accountability. Lordy, they might have to actually earn their money! (our tax dollars)

17 posted on 11/14/2004 6:05:10 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus (The South will rise again - we done got Viagra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Big mouth, no brains.


19 posted on 11/14/2004 6:07:10 PM PST by beckham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

My guess would be if Bin Laden has a nuke it is a dirty nuke. I very much doubt he has something the size of the one that destroyed Hiroshima. If he does what will be his method of delivery?


22 posted on 11/14/2004 6:07:39 PM PST by foolscap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
Dan rather, reporting from NY, hair falling out, radiation-sick, and weeping will get the libs in denial roused. Finally.

But I think they'll pick an easier target. Air shipment to US is pert much sealed-off; incoming ocean traffic is tight as a [insert Ratherism here] Beeper-like devices are everywhere.

26 posted on 11/14/2004 6:10:06 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
Whatever he really thinks, his primary reason for appearing on all the talk shows and talking about nuclear attacks is that he wants to increase his book sales. He's getting a LOT of free publicity.


28 posted on 11/14/2004 6:11:12 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

I think that it is pretty obvious, that the population will not tolerate something like that. I can see every treaty and international law getting chucked out the window. Probably quite a few hate crimes directed at Arabs and Muslims here in the states, not to mention anywhere else in the world where they are worried about terrorism. I really can't believe that any terrorist would be so stupid as to think that their cause would have a future after something like that.


33 posted on 11/14/2004 6:13:28 PM PST by Mike1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Well you asked me if I thought we'd ever use nukes again.... This was the scenario I was considering when I answered affirmatively.


37 posted on 11/14/2004 6:16:33 PM PST by NeoCaveman ("I expressed myself rather forcefully, felt better after I had done it," -- VP Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
"They're intention

This kind of grammatical error should be avoidable after about 7th grade, and certainly at a website that purports to write serious news.

39 posted on 11/14/2004 6:19:33 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

"They're intention is to end the war"

They're or their?


41 posted on 11/14/2004 6:20:20 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson