Peterson had the misfortune of a jury of his peers. OJ had the fortune of a jury of non-peers.
Peterson should not die.
There's just enough doubt there for me to reject that in this case.
Without physical or eyewitness evidence there should be no death penalty imposed ever.
About the Peterson jury, what did they base their guilty verdict on? I have a strong feeling that Scott Peterson murdered Laci and Conner. But the jury has to decide whether it was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Did the jury see evidence that the public wasn't allowed to see?
And if they accidentally lock Greta and all the lawyers in the gas chamber with him, I won't cry.
The guy was obviously guilty, only those lacking common sense would agree. And when you lack common sense, you can come up with all sorts of 'doubts' to sooth your mind...
You are correct in all your assertions! I predict that Peterson and lawyers will submit multiple, possibly endless appeals and will live on for years behind bars. Whether or not he will eventually pay the price with an injection would depend largely upon the very liberal CA court system (bad example: the infamous 9th Court)