[EagleUSA]

Being liberal -- is being anti-ethics, anti-principles, anti-law, anti-Constitution, anti-values, anti-everything, just about, based on the substance and content of the Kerry campaign. Anti-everything and ZERO SUBSTANCE.

So 4-letter words, just another form of anti-class, anti-correctness, anti-establishment order of the day from the scumbags that are the far-left of today.

[Sonny M]

I'm sure that my new friends at the Democratic Underground are going to be anxious to remind me of Vice President Cheney's little faux pas directed at Connecticut's Christopher Dodd in the hallowed chambers of Congress earlier this year.

It was Pat Leahy not Chris Dodd.

[anniegetyourgun]

I have long-since developed my theory as to why libs are so profane. It is, to be sure, an indication of a limited repertoire and management of the English language, but most assuredly a clear sign of a lack of self-control. Every (and I mean EVERY) liberal I have known (personally) has a problem in this area.

I believe both Clintons were classic examples in this regard. Both of them lack in self-control. And, despite their educational level, they fall back upon intemperate language when under pressure, angered, or exposed in deceit.

[Bonaparte]

"Yes, Tad. The American people want to hear vulgarity from the First Lady whenever possible."

Nice to know democrats find screaming profanities "refreshing." I hope Hillary and Devine continue to "share" their taste in communication with the American people.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Why? Because they have no morals other than what they feel like having at the moment.

[joylyn]

If Cheney had cussed out Sen. Dodd, it would have been a faux pas. Since the target was Leahy, he was only giving voice to what many have wished they had the nerve to say.