Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lock and Load
NY Times ^ | November 13, 2004 | NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

Posted on 11/13/2004 2:34:57 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last
To: lentulusgracchus
And if more would read some of Elmer Keith's work, that "safe" distance would have to be at least 300yds.

We have an annual Elmer Keith shoot; the targets are at 150 yds, and no scopes allowed - iron sights only. Most are pretty amazed at what you can do with a .22.

John Linebaugh's Six-Gun Seminar this last June saw some great results with .38 Special "plinker" loads at 500 yards, and .357 Mag at 600 yds. Folks shooting the full-house .475 and .500 loads were duly impressed!

121 posted on 11/13/2004 5:35:28 PM PST by castlebrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: hophead
as with baseball bats, screwdrivers, hammers, BMWs...they're all tools made for a purpose. It's the user that determines whether they are rightly or wrongly employed. But that would imply a level of personal responsibility.

Guns are as safe as they can be made. As with other inanimate objects, they do not rise up of their own volition and strike either out of instinct or with malice aforethought.

122 posted on 11/13/2004 5:45:06 PM PST by castlebrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Oorang

Do you have a link that explains the source of U.S. Dept of Health Human Services statistics. Unless they have new and better studies to base that number, they are using exaggerated numbers and blaming it all on docs. I started the thread. I'm a doc who believes in the Second Amendment.


123 posted on 11/13/2004 6:00:16 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Guns could and should be made safer.

As others have said, guns are quite safe. Unsafe guns tend not to do very well in the marketplace. The issues this clown brings up are all instances of unsafe handling practices, not unsafe guns. Strange that he doesn't propose teaching children to handle guns safely. Oh wait, the NRA already does that, and he certainly can't acknowledge THAT.

124 posted on 11/13/2004 6:10:02 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

Nice graphic, otherwise!


125 posted on 11/13/2004 6:13:54 PM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

I have a Colt .25 "vestpocket" model that uses the grip safety. It was made in 1918. Not 19th century.


126 posted on 11/13/2004 6:29:15 PM PST by Fireone (Homeland security is 10,000 rounds of ammo and 10 cords of dry firewood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: The SISU kid
Also if drivers licenses & marriage licenses cross over state lines why can't my concealed carry permit???

      Sounds like a "full faith and credit" issue to me.
127 posted on 11/13/2004 7:25:12 PM PST by Celtman (It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tahiti

Your point would make sense if it were applied equally to cars, bicycles, ladders, airplanes and every other item of manufacture which has been lawyered to death. Since this theory has not been applied in this way, it is difficult to develop a rationale as a result of which firearms are exempt from the standards applied to all other products.


128 posted on 11/13/2004 7:38:08 PM PST by Restorer (Europe is heavily armed, but only with envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
One poll showed that 88 percent of the public favors requiring that guns be childproof

Mandatory sentencing for the idiots that allow children access to guns should take care of the problem.

129 posted on 11/13/2004 8:02:37 PM PST by GVnana (If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris

Attention sports fans:

The sensor/indicator of a loaded gun is a RED HERRING for law suits and lawyer seeking a new cash cow.

No matter how good it may be some fool will claim the "indicator showed unloaded" or "too hard to read".

Proper gun safety lesson number one is ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS treat, assume and handle ALL guns as if loaded. Somebody hands you a gun they just checked to be empty YOU check it again. No indicator will work for a round in the chamber of an automatic without compromising safety from the explosion.


130 posted on 11/13/2004 8:23:36 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Thanks for the links Duncan. Good-to-go.


131 posted on 11/13/2004 9:01:08 PM PST by DocH (Release ALL your Navy records AND your private journal Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

the number-one most effective gun safety measure:
a properly trained firearms operator.

the stats re: accidental discharge indicate that an NRA trained gunner is nowhere near as likely to cause such an accident as is a gunner with no NRA training. I forget the ration, but it was pretty impressive.


132 posted on 11/13/2004 9:06:49 PM PST by King Prout (tagline under reconstruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragnorak
just trying to think like a lib

Hmmmm I think I'll try that to what could possmmffp pppfmmmtp mmhhhpp


133 posted on 11/13/2004 10:40:01 PM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
but some handguns can fire if they hit the ground.

This is garbage.

This was dealt with years ago.

There are some older ones that this may apply to but modern handguns will not fire unless the trigger is pulled, unless defective.

The government passed regulations requiring all handguns to pass a drop test around 1970.

134 posted on 11/13/2004 10:56:58 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; PJ-Comix
Alex Penelas, the once and future governor/Senator of Florida, tried the "public health" approach to gun control when I was living in Miami-Dade county back in 1999-2000. Thankfully, he got spanked by the state legislature for trying to counteract state law, and his "public health" argument, similar to what Kristof advocates in this article, failed with the "public."

The good news in that case is that Alex Penelas, who was considered THE rising star in the Florida Democratic Party, has since seen his star fizzle and will probably next be seen doing a McGreevey due to his personal predelictions. Nevertheless, his career was cut short at least partially by his advocacy of gun control for the "public health" a few years back.

135 posted on 11/13/2004 11:07:42 PM PST by Clemenza (Gabba Gabba Hey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The NYT just doesn't get it.

Clueless.


136 posted on 11/13/2004 11:26:19 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

IIRC, it's BS. His 1903 autopistol (1911 pre-cursor) lacked a grip safety.


137 posted on 11/14/2004 2:14:23 AM PST by SirLurkedalot (Thank You Veterans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Here's a comment and a question for freepers: The Democratic Party will "re-make" itself in the wake of their most recent debacle. They now realize that the question concerning their record on firearms has haunted them for over 10 years. Actually much longer if you go back to the 1968 GCA.

IF they concede that handguns are a part of the fabric of American society, and they embrace this......what will be the reaction of the US public to an initiative by their leaders in Congress to push and pass legislation that would allow for total federal reciprocity for holders of concealed firearms permits under the 14th Amendment's Full Faith and Credit clause as well as the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection clause AND of course the Second Amendment? Meaning of course, that if your drivers license is good in another and all other states, so too, is your concealed weapons permit.

If they REALLY REALLY push this and successfully pass it with a majority, maybe even a super majority in House and Senate, then I'd say they have a good chance at regaining the White House next term, if their candidate also embraces the legislation. Maybe even with a comfortable majority of the votes. Even more so if they remain quiet and neutral on the issue of "assault weapons."

138 posted on 11/14/2004 6:24:26 AM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The model is automobiles, for a high rate of traffic deaths was once thought to be inevitable. But then we figured out ways to mitigate the harm with seat belts, air bags and collapsible steering columns, and since the 1950's the death rate per mile driven has dropped 80 percent.

The difference is that traffic deaths are caused by accidents, preventable perhaps, but not deliberate acts. Most "gun deaths" are a result of someone's deliberate act. No amount of *legitimate* safety features are going to prevent those acts. Thus all the cries for "gun safety" laws, are just smokescreens for more gun control.

Nice try, but no Kewpie doll.

139 posted on 11/14/2004 10:01:09 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51
I like the idea of gun safety classes in every school a lot more.

Not "gun safety" classes, those would become a forum for "Gun are evil" brainwashing. Shooting classes, where gun safety would be an integral part of the curriculum. Every freeman should know how to handle a gun. Just think how the presence of the "lab equipment" would tend to discourage anyone intending harm to the students in the school.

140 posted on 11/14/2004 10:06:15 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson