I apologize for my obscurity/brevity.
What I mean is this.
Of course his motives for his writings may come into question. Hell, everybody who writes a book/column/post has an 'agenda' or 'motive' for doing so...thats a given.
In "his creds" I was referring to his credentials. He was head of a unit tasked with keeping track of OBL. This position by its very nature placed information in his grasp that far exceeds that available to the average bear.
As to his credibility - like I said, everybody has an agenda.
My basic comments is perhaps better stated as this:
Just because you don't like the guy, don't discount his entire message.
Which is what? That we're a bunch of arrogant assholes and Osama is a tuned in dude? That's what I'm getting! I'm sorry!
Which makes him what? Remember that Clinton was offered OBL and refused him. Give me a break, this guy is a partisan hack who is intent on destroying the administration. I will not fill my head with his propaganda.