Skip to comments.
Website Nuclear Bomb Claim, Attributed to Al-Qaeda
Tracking Terrorism ^
| November 12, 2004
Posted on 11/12/2004 3:50:38 PM PST by kupia_kummi
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: kupia_kummi
Bring it, Osama, I'm ready for you.
To: kupia_kummi
Well, at least we know it's not in Iraq; the land of no WMD.
To: kupia_kummi
The one thing I truly pray to see on television is a live news report on a crowd of seething mad Joe Sixpacks dragging one of these rectal cavities out of a bomb-laden vehicle that didn't detonate, and collectively stomping a mudhole into his ass.....the ACLU puke that dares to come on TV and condemn it will be writing their own epitaph.
23
posted on
11/12/2004 4:56:03 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(Taglines? Vikings don't need no steenkin' taglines..............)
To: USMC79to83
Kill 'em all, let allah sort 'em out !
24
posted on
11/12/2004 5:10:30 PM PST
by
SENTINEL
(USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
To: mlbford2
Bring it on asswipe. You might get a few thousand of us, but we will illiminate the muslim world as you know it today. Sadly we won't do that, we will hem and haw about who is truly responsible, since we won't be able to pin it on a country we will issue an arrest warrant, and ask the UN to help us out. We may even have to ask permission to offer a one Billion dollar reward.<(¿)>
25
posted on
11/12/2004 5:40:09 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(Sometimes the truth hurts, sometimes it makes a difference, but not often.)
To: The Hollywood Conservative
I think we would know if a nuclear bomb had gone off somewhere... even a 'small' one. We still don't seem to know what blew up in North Korea, a while back.
26
posted on
11/12/2004 5:41:47 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(Sometimes the truth hurts, sometimes it makes a difference, but not often.)
To: Mad Mammoth
we have the ability, and we definitely have the will Half right, I am afraid.
27
posted on
11/12/2004 5:43:32 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(Sometimes the truth hurts, sometimes it makes a difference, but not often.)
To: itsahoot
You raise an interesting point... But I've never been a big beleiver that AQ and KIM ILL are going to find common ground.
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: Mad Mammoth
Now that the Islamofascists are starting to babble about nuclear-this and nuclear-that, it is time for President Bush (or more appropriately, Don Rumsfeld, since he drives the liberals & leftists insane) to make a public statement in no uncertain terms that IF any Islamic terrorist group detonates ANY nuclear device upon U.S. soil or U.S. interests anywhere in the world, be it a dirty bomb, or actual nuclear warhead, that it will be the policy of the United States to respond with a nuclear strike...
That is precisely the Bush Doctrine on WMD use by the US. Don't worry, we're ready to respond in-kind and then some!
30
posted on
11/12/2004 5:47:25 PM PST
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: Truth Table
EU holds the Israelis in check. America does not have this problem. Afraid we do, we are letting allawa(sp) call the shots, else explain why we pulled back 3 times before this.
31
posted on
11/12/2004 5:55:33 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(Sometimes the truth hurts, sometimes it makes a difference, but not often.)
To: The Hollywood Conservative
"I think we would know if a nuclear bomb had gone off somewhere... even a 'small' one."
Small ones have gone off since the 1990's. China is the only nation, I believe, to have actually tested a neutron weapon. Of course, China was the recipient nation of krinton's treasonous gifts. From China, rogue nations all over the world can be assumed to have access to the most secret American nuclear designs. In the most sardonic twist in history, the nuclear cat is out of the bag thanks to the treason of the RATs.
32
posted on
11/12/2004 6:28:23 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true RAT legacy.)
To: itsahoot
Sure. Allawi has to walk a balancing act. He is in a very difficult position. He must try to get a government established by giving the terriorists the chance to get the hell out of Iraq. Since he has reached the point where he realizes that it is not possible to hold free elections with strongholds in place and productive, he realizes All bets are now off, and Allwai will put down the terrorists in a very brutal way to set an example. Sort of like what happened with asad and hamma.
This is a different dymamic than the Isrealis face with the EU.
To: Mad Mammoth
I've told my antiwar friends that logically from their point of view, they should support George Bush 1000%. They've got to realize, that the Islamo-fascists will continue their attacks on us, whether or not we strike back. We've tried the not striking back option for 30 years. During the 90's, the attacks just got bigger and bolder, while Clinton and Monica entertained each other in the Oval Office.
Then came 9/11. This proved that the terrorists have no limits. We can't wait for another attack, we had to go on the offensive. First Afghanistan, which has been an amazing success. Then, Iraq. It can be argued that Iran or North Korea would have been better second targets, but Iraq was chosen.
Iraq is and will receive billions to build up their infrastructure, etc. The resulting model is supposed to exercise influence on the Arab Middle East. This is the soft option.
If the soft option fails, that doesn't mean the war ends we quit. It just means we have to move on to the hard option. This option will almost certainly include the use of nuclear weapons and the deaths of millions or 10's, or 100's of millions of Muslims.
Therefore, if you don't want to see that you must support Bush in making Iraq a success and hope that this strategy works. Or it's bye-bye Mecca, Medina, Falluja, Damascus, Cairo, etc.
34
posted on
11/12/2004 9:03:40 PM PST
by
Jabba the Nutt
(Michael Moore: Will lie for food and I stay busy!)
To: kupia_kummi
yeah and they tested this bomb where? Ever satalite around the world would light up like a christmas tree... er kwanza tree
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson