Destro, there's no question that Racak was a crime against humanity committed by Serb forces. The ONLY issue they are resolving at the Hague is the extent to which the higher level chain of command up to Slobo should be held liable. And based on these telephone intercepts it is clear that the Racak crimes weren't just confined to the local Serb units and commanders.
You distort the article like you distortthe truth. UN and Amnesty International - the Albanian witnesses are shown to have lied - made up - their eye witness testimony - which contradicts forensic evidence (no execution style wounds). You just can't be honest with yourself.
"A picture is beginning to emerge from the autopsies, and it is a tragic one," said another source, explaining that the types of wounds on the victims indicate that they were "humiliated" before being fired on from several directions.
Can someone please explain what wounds and how they indicate the victims were "humiliated"? Or is this pure sensationalism?
He said that he and other men had been rounded up by security forces in house-to-house searches and ordered to walk along a ravine before troops "started shooting from the hills at us. . . . Firing came from all over."
Yet another version? I'm not discounting this eye-witness at all, mind you, but then what about "close range"?