Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Sides to Global Warming
Reason ^ | November 10, 2004 | Ronald Bailey

Posted on 11/11/2004 10:30:04 AM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2004 10:30:04 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; ...

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.


2 posted on 11/11/2004 10:34:06 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The sun is hotter than ever before. One Volcano in the Philippines gave off more gas than the who industrial revolution so we are going to reverse the trend by no more cars. NOT A CHANCE!!!
3 posted on 11/11/2004 10:40:48 AM PST by mountainlyons (alienated vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Rather obviously there was a significant warming to ~1940 (series max 1938, prior to any significant atmospheric CO2 increase), followed by a cooling persisting into the 1970s (great global cooling scare) and a subsequent recovery to temps similar to those seen 65 years previously. Total zonal warming over 65 years? -0.06°C

4 posted on 11/11/2004 10:48:18 AM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

In the global warming controversy, there is supposed to be a famous green scientist who, after studying it in an attempt to prove it, came to the conclusion that the theory is bunk. Do you know who that is and how to link to good information of his findings?


5 posted on 11/11/2004 10:48:18 AM PST by Lakeshark (Whatever...................................................................:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump


6 posted on 11/11/2004 10:48:43 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I don't know.


7 posted on 11/11/2004 10:55:19 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; neverdem
Bjorn Lomborg
8 posted on 11/11/2004 10:58:02 AM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee (const tag& constTagPassedByReference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Lomborg doesn't actually think that Global Warming itself is bunk. He thinks that it (along w/ many other similiar "theories") has been wildly overblown and that the environmentalists' cure, ie. Kyoto Treaty, will be worse than the disease.


9 posted on 11/11/2004 11:01:14 AM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee (const tag& constTagPassedByReference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mountainlyons
I worked with an ecologist-turned-programmer around 1981.

He was telling me about the krill drying up then, but due to overfishing by some Asian country, iirc.

10 posted on 11/11/2004 11:01:57 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I, for one, am hoping for global warming and that it will hurry up and get here. Boating season is way too short up here in New England because of the cold and with the higher water levels, we'll have new and exciting places to visit. It'd be like Venice right in our backyard!

Actually, until these "climatologists" can answer for me 1)"Who affected the climate to start the Ice Age?" and 2)"Who affected the climate to end the Ice Age?" I will continue to take their findings and analysis as pure bullpucky.


11 posted on 11/11/2004 11:08:23 AM PST by LoneGOPinCT (From the Land of Liberalty. All we are saying is give pizza chants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
What about the report on the Antarctic krill? The shrimp-like krill are the foundation of the food chain in the oceans around Antarctica, being dined upon by whales, seals, fish, and penguins. The report finds that krill populations off the Antarctic Peninsula have declined by 80 to 90 percent in recent years.

...other factors which may affect the organism include an increase in predation...

Didn't we seriously reduce whale hunting since the late '70s? Aren't seals, penguins, whales, etc. protected species which would mean their populations would increase meaning they would eat more krill?

12 posted on 11/11/2004 11:10:53 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

you make a good point. let's say global warming is a fact (man-made or not.) seems that there would be just as many good/beneficial effects as bad ones, but we never hear about it.


13 posted on 11/11/2004 11:19:28 AM PST by frankenMonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
What is a Radiosonde?
14 posted on 11/11/2004 11:28:54 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Working in air quality, I see how policy makers and politicians use and abuse science every day.

Environmental models are very dicey. We use and create models to predict air quality. They are generally accurate 1 or 2 years out but decline steeply after that. You just can't add enough inputs to ensure accuracy.

But that won't stop a policy wonk from using highly suspect projections at the 15 year mark. They are always wrong but by then, they've moved on.
15 posted on 11/11/2004 11:47:04 AM PST by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Bjorn Lomborg wrote an incredible book called "The Skeptical Environmentalist". As far as I am concerned, it should be must-reading for all conservatives, no, for EVERYBODY! He debunks all the politically-motivated junk science theories. He doesn't say that global warming doesn't exist, just says it could be due to other factors AND that the "remedy" is worse than the disease. Get yourself that book ASAP; you'll never regret it. It comes in handy when I'm debating liberals on my dearly-held environmental issues, LOL! P.S. It could be a valuable tool in converting liberals, and we can use all of those we can find.


16 posted on 11/11/2004 12:54:45 PM PST by alwaysconservative (Addicted to FReeping and don't want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

That's one of the points Bjorn Lomborg makes: global warming can have as many beneficial effects as deleterious ones.


17 posted on 11/11/2004 12:56:03 PM PST by alwaysconservative (Addicted to FReeping and don't want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

mark


18 posted on 11/11/2004 1:00:14 PM PST by Jack of all Trades (Thank God I voted for Bush - AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

longer growing season here in MN for one thing.
then we can grow more corn , make more ethanol ,sell more
corn cars and make Paul Harvey very happy!


19 posted on 11/11/2004 1:52:59 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece: Hope IS on the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
What about increased sun-spot activity??? My brother read an article stating that sun-spot activity is in a 60 year cycle that is the highest in 1,000 years. Sorry I can't show the article or verify this - just a possibility???
20 posted on 11/11/2004 1:54:19 PM PST by GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos (Now let's prosecute voter fraud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson