Skip to comments.
N.Y. GOP Seeks 2006 Senate Candidate
NY Sun ^
| 11/10/04
| WILLIAM F. HAMMOND JR.
Posted on 11/10/2004 6:07:32 PM PST by wagglebee
ALBANY - New York Republicans don't have a lot of time to bounce back from their drubbing at the polls last week: The race against Senator Clinton is just two years away.
Defeating the former first lady, or at least tarnishing her image, will be a priority for Republicans nationwide in 2006, given Mrs. Clinton's status as the Democrats' early front-runner for president in 2008.
(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...
TOPICS: Announcements; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2006; clinton; clintonistas; electionussenate; gop; guiliani; hitlery; nysenate2006; pataki; x24
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
I think Sean Hannity should be drafted to run, he can win this thing.
1
posted on
11/10/2004 6:07:35 PM PST
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Please, don't let Alan Keyes run.
2
posted on
11/10/2004 6:09:54 PM PST
by
xJones
To: wagglebee
To: wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Why don't they decide in a smokey back room on an uninspiring candidate and run him/her.
5
posted on
11/10/2004 6:11:30 PM PST
by
correctthought
(Hippies, want to change the world, but all they ever do is smoke pot and smell bad)
To: wagglebee
6
posted on
11/10/2004 6:12:04 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: wagglebee
Why not Alan Keyes?
He worked out so well for us...
7
posted on
11/10/2004 6:12:07 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: correctthought
Just did that,his name was Mills.
8
posted on
11/10/2004 6:12:40 PM PST
by
carlr
To: RWR8189
hah, maybe he can try for sub 10% of the vote this time?
People keep mentioning rudy for 2008, but he would crash and burn as a presidential candidate. The south that is the base of the republican party would never go for a guy like him.
Better to have him run against hillary in 2006 and solve three problems at once.
9
posted on
11/10/2004 6:14:29 PM PST
by
flashbunny
(Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
To: kellynla
its Rudy, or Pataki (my bet) - else Hillary wins re-election.
To: wagglebee
This is the proper place for Giuliani, but I doubt he will have to run against Bill's lesbian life partner.
11
posted on
11/10/2004 6:14:56 PM PST
by
Stonedog
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's difficult to pronounce.)
To: flashbunny
so the south is going to vote for Hillary over Rudy, is that your contention?
To: wagglebee
I don't know if Sean could win in a NY statewide election. Has she announced if she is actually going to run for re-election? Many have suggested that she won't risk it and instead spend the two intervening years campaigning for the Presidency if in fact that is her intention. If she lost re-election, then she would be "damaged goods" for the Presidential election and have a lesser chance of winning.
I still say Giuliani is our best chance - he's Republican but his social values reflect many New Yorkers (now I'm not speaking for anyone!!).
13
posted on
11/10/2004 6:15:21 PM PST
by
Norman Bates
(Game over. Bush wins.)
To: oceanview
or they could just stay home.
nothing like having a candidate who discourages your base to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
14
posted on
11/10/2004 6:18:04 PM PST
by
flashbunny
(Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
To: correctthought
Why don't they decide in a smokey back room on an uninspiring candidate and run him/her. The RATS already tried that and sKerry lost :)
15
posted on
11/10/2004 6:18:12 PM PST
by
upchuck
(Pajamas? I don' need no steenking pajamas!!)
To: RWR8189
Why not Alan Keyes? He'd be a good choice, but he's not a New Yorker - he lives in Illinois.
16
posted on
11/10/2004 6:18:53 PM PST
by
Scenic Sounds
(Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
To: oceanview
"so the south is going to vote for Hillary over Rudy, is that your contention?"
No... we won't vote at all. Bank on it.
Say what you will, but all pro-choices are the same to evangelicals.
17
posted on
11/10/2004 6:19:47 PM PST
by
AlGone2001
(If liberals must lie to advance their agenda, why is liberalism good for me?)
To: Graybeard58; kellynla
Guiliani wants to run for president. He can't run the risk of losing to the Hildabeast and then running against her for president. Remember the presidential campaign would begin within a few months of the senatorial election, back-to-back campaigns would be incredibly difficult.
Then again, it worked out well for Abraham Lincoln (although I have a feeling that the campaigns were a little easier back then).
18
posted on
11/10/2004 6:20:02 PM PST
by
wagglebee
(Memo to sKerry: the only think Bush F'ed up was your career)
To: wagglebee
19
posted on
11/10/2004 6:20:50 PM PST
by
sitetest
(Why does everyone get so uptight over toasted heretics?)
To: wagglebee
What makes you think Sean 'Hey buddy, how are you buddy, lets have that steak dinner, buddy!' Hannity can win in a state that went for Kerry 3-1?
20
posted on
11/10/2004 6:21:09 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson