Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So fast it could drop a cruise missile on an enemy target, almost like shooting a rifle.

... I like ...



Click on the photo for an explanation.
1 posted on 11/10/2004 9:31:29 AM PST by the_gospel_of_thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: the_gospel_of_thomas

NASA is racing to stay ahead of Richard Branson.


2 posted on 11/10/2004 9:32:49 AM PST by PeterFinn ("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM, they can hate us all they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

There is a simple reason why the test flights are only designed to last about ten seconds, material has yet been developed to withstand the forces and the temperature for longer flights. I believe we are a long way from sustained hypersonic flight within the atmosphere.


3 posted on 11/10/2004 9:33:43 AM PST by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

Order 100,000 of them, NOW!


4 posted on 11/10/2004 9:33:58 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

BTTT


5 posted on 11/10/2004 9:34:54 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

"an engine so blindingly fast that it could carry an airplane from San Francisco to Washington, D.C., in about 20 minutes -- or even quicker"

Yes, but they would have to use a putty knife to remove you from your seat.


6 posted on 11/10/2004 9:38:09 AM PST by hiho hiho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

Can we stuff Hanoi John into this sucker?


7 posted on 11/10/2004 9:39:37 AM PST by Howie66 ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas
almost like shooting a rifle.

Just a wee bit faster.

8 posted on 11/10/2004 9:41:08 AM PST by sionnsar (NYT/Cbs: "It's fake but true!" | Iran Azadi | Traditional Anglicans: trad-anglican.faithweb.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

ping


12 posted on 11/10/2004 9:49:58 AM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

Why would Japan team up with france? france will just ruin or free ride on all of Japan's plans... So we can expect Japan's experiments to be some 10-20 years behind because of their addition of france... I'm not kidding, I suspect that because of france their plans are off by an entire decade, at least.


20 posted on 11/10/2004 10:04:50 AM PST by Porterville (IT'S GOOD TO BE REPUBLICAN- ASK ME HOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

Go USA. It's about time we had a breakthrough in technology. Now we need one in energy.


24 posted on 11/10/2004 10:13:48 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas
Unlike rockets, which must carry oxygen with them as a "combustor" to ignite the fuel supply, scramjets take oxygen from the atmosphere, offering a huge savings in aircraft weight, and researchers around the world would like to take advantage.

I see that knowledge of the subject matter is no impediment to finding a job. Where do they find these writers?

For those that are curious, a SCRAMJET (Supersonic Combustion Ramjet) is an engine that uses shockwaves created by the engine's internal geometry to compress the air entering it. The vehicle, of course, needs to be travelling at a speed which will produce shockwaves inside the engine. In contrast, a typical jet-engine has a rows of compressor blades and a turbine connected by a shaft which adds considerable weight. The SCRAMJET is, at the risk of over-simplifying, really just a hollow tube.

27 posted on 11/10/2004 10:22:55 AM PST by Ranxerox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

Okay, so if Mach 5 is "3800 mph", how can Mach 10 be "about 7200 mph"?


31 posted on 11/10/2004 10:44:20 AM PST by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...

42 posted on 11/10/2004 5:38:35 PM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas
So fast it could drop a cruise missile on an enemy target, almost like shooting a rifle.

Camels and tents : watch out...


BUMP

50 posted on 11/11/2004 2:49:01 AM PST by tm22721 (In fac they)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas; Brett66; KevinDavis; Happy2BMe; devolve

With 'Scramjet,' NASA Shoots for Mach 10
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1276446/posts

Wow! That's MOVIN'!!


51 posted on 11/11/2004 5:48:54 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the_gospel_of_thomas

pardon the profanity...

but this kicks ass.


66 posted on 11/11/2004 10:21:00 PM PST by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson