Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: esryle

"disturbing schools."

? You can be charged with disturbing schools?


4 posted on 11/10/2004 5:31:38 AM PST by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nuconvert

If you disturb them with 25 rounds of 20 mm target ammo, then yes. But otherwise it does seem an odd offence.


9 posted on 11/10/2004 5:33:47 AM PST by agere_contra (You are worthless ... Alec Baldwin ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert

i wonder if charges would be dropped if it could be shown that the school was "deeply saddened" instead of disturbed...

a double dose of ritalin ought to cure it.


15 posted on 11/10/2004 5:36:47 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert
"disturbing schools."

? You can be charged with disturbing schools?

They should be charging the principal, this school seems very disturbing.

20 posted on 11/10/2004 5:51:50 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert

Interesting language puzzle, isn't it?

One has to wonder if the word disturbing is being used as an adjective. In that case, one would think they should charge the County. I know I find most public schools to be very disturbing.


26 posted on 11/10/2004 5:59:56 AM PST by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson