Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/09/2004 7:59:31 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Mulder
The 5.56mm (or .223 Remington in its civilian version) is best when using the heavier bullets up to the equivalent of the 77gr Boat-tail (which is a copy of the military Stoner bullet) that matches the lethality of the .308 Winchester (7.62mm NATO) at 350m given that your barrel twist can handle the length of the heavier bullet without causing stability problems. If you don't mind recoil (which is a function of velocity and bullet weight) stick with the NATO (.308) round. If you are susceptible to recoil go with the 5.56mm round, just make sure your target is within the 350m lethality limitation. (THE 350m lethality measure was developed by the US Army in the 1970s as a benchmark during the Cold War. Warsaw Pact doctrine had infantry dismounting from BMPs at that range for assaults.)
As far as scopes are concerned, go for a 3X9 variable with a mil-dot reticle. A fixed 4 power doesn't offer the variety of options that a variable does. And the mil-dot, once you learn how to use it, let's you judge range without having to futz around with tables or cams or any of the other kind of crap that takes time and losses your target.
The FN is OK, as is the H&K, but I would stick with the M1A or the Ruger Mini-14 just because I like them. All are gas operated in one form or another and the recoil is therefore diminished.
But if'n you want real fun go for a good ole M-1 in 30-06. It'll really reach out an touch someone.
77 posted on 11/09/2004 9:36:51 PM PST by Old Sarge Ski (To be dealt with as wolves are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder; All

What if you live in Kalifornia?

Can any of these be legal?


79 posted on 11/09/2004 9:41:35 PM PST by NoLibZone (During the Sox vs Cards game I never once feared for crowd's safety- Because W's President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
If you are looking for a modern, well-made, seriously tough weapon, then consider either the Heckler & Koch 91 (7.62 NATO/.308 Win) or 93 (5.56). Bother are incredibly tough weapons. In addition, they are easy to maintain, have tons of extras (magazines, stocks, slings, battle sights, etc.), and are extremely accurate. I've got one of each in my safe - with lots of mags - lots of mags because once you start shooting these beasts you won't want to stop for a long time...
80 posted on 11/09/2004 9:41:44 PM PST by GunnyB (Once a Marine, Always a Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder; chookter; Jeff Head; archy

I'm a devout fan of all things M1A Mulder.....

The M1A IMHO is a much better rig, accuracy and reliability either muddy or shiny clean it'll go bang every time. magazines are once again cheap for it and ya can't go wrong.

As the FN-FAL The only resident expert I know of is archy, Jeff Head or Chookter.....

As to the M1A "pistol grip" stock I believe Fulton Armory has what you seek. I don't like em. They were original for the M14 flavor and I think you'll find they ain't what ya want on a fine new M1A.

If ya get an M4 Carbine I suggest Bushmasters new rig that is AWB virus free. I purchased two brand new ones after the clintonista batfag fairy was shot down and they are flawless rigs.


82 posted on 11/09/2004 9:52:53 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

FN-FAL is elegant, comfortable to shoot, accurate and easy to take down for cleaning.

HK91 is industrial in feel, accurate, rugged, and reliable. More of a pain to take down.

Springfield M1A is beautiful, points well, accurate, reliable.

All are excellent choices - proven, battle-tested rifles with long pedigrees. Check out all three and decide which you enjoy most.


93 posted on 11/09/2004 10:46:53 PM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
" For Mulder, it's all going to come down to budget I guess. "

if this is the case , then here is a good deal on a Para-Fal
type of rifle :

http://www.gunbroker.com/auction/viewitem.asp?item=25307236

great starting price on this auction and no bidders so far.
97 posted on 11/09/2004 11:09:00 PM PST by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Hey Mulder,

If I went with an AR10 platform it would be the G.A. Precision AR-10 built by George Gardner. Everything I've read is positive. I have a custom built NM Springfield M1A. It's a great rifle but scope mounting and bedding is an issue.

Check it out here: http://www.gaprecision.net/content/products.php

98 posted on 11/09/2004 11:18:47 PM PST by in the Arena (James Wayne Herrick, Jr. Captain/US Air Force - MIA - Laos - 27 October 1969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
No contest. Get an M1 from the CMP. "The best battle implement ever devised." G. Patton
106 posted on 11/10/2004 6:04:21 AM PST by ol painless (ol' painless is out of the bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

Mauser.


107 posted on 11/10/2004 6:05:00 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
If all you care about is performance, there is nothing I have ever seen which can beat the HK-91. I have owned several and they were all 100% reliable and really unusually accurate, in fact they would beat most bolt actions.

The only down side is they feel a little clunky to me.

I personally want very very much one of the commercial FN's which were imported by Gun South. I looked at one in the store a few years ago and was drooling over it but couldn't afford the $2000 price tag. Maybe they are cheaper now. The same store had an FN (was it the FNC?) sub caliber in .223 at a very reasonable price. (I think it was only $400) I wish I had bought one because they disappeared pretty quickly.

113 posted on 11/10/2004 6:34:50 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

I just sold two Colt 5.56 "poodle shooters" and am going to use the money to buy an M1A. There's a lot of open space here in Northern Colorado.


114 posted on 11/10/2004 6:40:56 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

FN-FAL.


116 posted on 11/10/2004 8:15:30 AM PST by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
We've got AR-15s (Armalite) and an FAL.

I LIKE the FAL that I can put the red dot on a target at 400 yards and EXPECT to perforate it with with substantial energy transfer at that distance.

I like the AR-15 (Armalite) because it's VERY accurate, has low recoil, and you can carry a substantial amount of ammo over an equivalent weight of .308 ammo. But it has a BAD reputation as a battle rifle.

The ".223 vs .308" discussion is a religious war. :-) You're going to get everybody's opinion here, including mine! But I'll tell you this. I've got a most gracious and lovely woman in my house who simply does NOT have the upper body strength to effectively handle the FAL. The odds of her ever being as effective as I am with it are very low. However, she shoots the AR-15 VERY well, as does my 9 yr old (boy)....as does my 11 yr old (girl).

The trade off in my purist rifleman's mind was that the AR is useable by more people in my house than just me. So my primary weapon is the FAL, unless it breaks, and then I fall back to the AR (always keep a spare!).

Having said all that....I wish I had bought a DSA SA-58. (http://www.dsarms.com) instead fo my "mostly" STG-58 FAL. :-)
129 posted on 11/10/2004 12:28:21 PM PST by hiredhand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Check out the Russian VEPR it's an AK but in .308 built on the RPK receiver... http://www.robarm.com/
130 posted on 11/10/2004 12:37:40 PM PST by tophat9000 (We didn’t rise They Sunk Look at the blue, water filled, sink holes map (Mike Moore Fatass divots ?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

Damn! I thought that this was going to be a Halo2 discussion.


133 posted on 11/10/2004 12:52:04 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder


U.S.C.M. M41-A Pulse Rifle
137 posted on 11/10/2004 1:36:15 PM PST by GunnyHartman (Allah is allah outta virgins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Here is some of our inventory in Daleville,Al.We are near Ft,Rucker Army base.
Not trying to sell anything just some pics of guns.
http://www.ordnancedepot.com/weapons.htm


147 posted on 11/10/2004 3:58:57 PM PST by hubno (hub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

Check out the new Bushmaster offerings

http://www.bushmaster.com/shopping/weapons/bushmaster308.asp


149 posted on 11/10/2004 4:14:33 PM PST by Spottys Spurs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

M1A and or M14

Hard to improve upon perfection.


155 posted on 11/10/2004 6:50:40 PM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

M1-A is the way to go. Expensive, but worth it and holds its value. I have several .308 semi-autos, but the M1-A is the best. If you want a beater, get a FAL or a CETME. If you want an expensive beater, get a G3 or H&K 91.


165 posted on 11/10/2004 8:34:30 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson