Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Bush Says He's Really, Really Not Running For President
Local 6 (Florida) ^ | November 9, 2004

Posted on 11/09/2004 10:59:18 AM PST by Stoat

Gov. Bush Says He's Really, Really Not Running For President

 

POSTED: 11:10 am EST November 9, 2004

 

Read his lips. Gov. Jeb Bush really, really isn't interested in succeeding his brother in the White House or running for the U.S. Senate in 2006.

 Jeb BushHe's not kidding. So stop asking. At least until 2008.

  Bush reiterated Tuesday that he's not going to run for the Senate when Florida has a seat up in '06, has no designs on the 2008 presidential race and he's getting tired of the question.

 

  So the natural follow-up question?

  "Might you change your mind?" asked a reporter.

  "No!" the exasperated governor responded as he entered a state Cabinet meeting Tuesday morning. "Why am I not believable on this subject? This is driving me nuts."

  But before making that clear, he dodged a question on whether he might "eventually" run for president.

  "Eventually, what's that?" Bush asked after a sigh and before launching into his oft-repeated pledge to finish his second four-year term as governor, which ends in January 2007.

  "I'm not running for the United States Senate in 2006 and I'm not running for president in 2008."

  He never got back to the question about "eventually."



TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: election2008; governorbush; jebbush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Kozak

"I like him, but I'm glad. If this turned into another Bush Clinton election the whole thing would have too much of the wiff of a decadant Roman Republic with the Patrician families constantly vying for power. I don't want a monarchy or an empire."

Hear hear!!!

Now, if Jeb is out can we recruit Marcus Aurelius?


21 posted on 11/09/2004 11:47:03 AM PST by WOSG (Liberate Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Good....let him run for Senate. We are not like the democrats. We do not need family legacies as the only potential candidates for office.


22 posted on 11/09/2004 11:48:47 AM PST by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I hope not. While I like Jeb, I do not think America is ready for a dynasty. Also, on a personal note, I would like to see an election year without a Bush or Dole on the ticket. The last one was 1972 - over thirty years ago!


23 posted on 11/09/2004 11:52:32 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crimson Elephant
Jeb's problem is that if a Republican wins in 2008 he wouldn't be able to go in 2012 most likely.

That's not a problem, insofar as age goes. He's only 51. So in 2012, he'd still be only 59. He's young enough that he could even run in 2016, at age 63.

24 posted on 11/09/2004 11:52:38 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Katya

but if they're the best candidates, why not?


25 posted on 11/09/2004 11:53:09 AM PST by RightMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Katya
Good....let him run for Senate.

He also said he's not interested in running for the Senate in 2006.

26 posted on 11/09/2004 11:53:25 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; Mudboy Slim; FBD; ForGod'sSake; BraveMan; scholar
HA!!

Well maybe he will & maybe he won't but why not just encourage the rumor he is planning to run.
Float it around about ad nauseum.

The Liberal-Socialists will have mass aneurysms & those who don't will suffer strokes.

Now I ask, would that not be a splendid example of conservative compassion being applied?

...to cull the leftist herd? :o)

27 posted on 11/09/2004 11:55:01 AM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightMike
The idea that there's no one else in the entire Republican Party to run is what's stupid.
28 posted on 11/09/2004 11:58:16 AM PST by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I wouldn't like the idea of him running anyways. We don't need any dynasties in this country.


29 posted on 11/09/2004 11:59:18 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Well, as long as it isn't that one from NY.


30 posted on 11/09/2004 12:02:30 PM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

how about Cheney-Bush 2008? run the same ticket, flip the 2, and drive the liberals insane...haha


31 posted on 11/09/2004 12:03:27 PM PST by Jon Alvarez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
I'd love to see Jeb run. But with the exception of the Kennedys, the U.S. does not take kindly to dynasties. And the Bush family lacks the general public's love it had for the Kennedys.

Tom Ridge (PA) is looking at running. Maybe George Allen (VA). Both former governors.

The real key is to see who Dubya "annoints" two years from now.

32 posted on 11/09/2004 12:12:32 PM PST by fideist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jon Alvarez

Constitutionally, W is barred from running for VP, having been twice elected to the presidency.


33 posted on 11/09/2004 12:13:31 PM PST by SAJ (Start looking at writing March SI puts, $1.00 or so OOM, on any dip..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fideist
The real key is to see who Dubya "annoints" two years from now.

I'd rather that he didn't annoint anyone. After eight years of Republican rule, there will be advantages to being able to run as an outsider, as someone who wasn't part of the administration.

34 posted on 11/09/2004 12:17:01 PM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

doesn't spell that out...

The 22nd Amendment
Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section. 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.

Ratification was completed on February 27, 1951.


35 posted on 11/09/2004 12:17:23 PM PST by Jon Alvarez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

fla ping


36 posted on 11/09/2004 12:17:59 PM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

< Devils advocate > HMmm Didn't see anything about not running for VP in 2008 ...Condi/Bush 2008??


37 posted on 11/09/2004 12:19:55 PM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; summer; Goldwater Girl; windchime; ...
Florida Freeper

I'm compiling a list of FReepers in Florida for use in the upcoming elections.
If you want to be added, please FReepMail me.


38 posted on 11/09/2004 12:29:41 PM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Well if he doesn't run, we better have another Bush, Dole, or Nixon in the wings, we can't break the streak that's been going on since 1952 (sans 1964)


39 posted on 11/09/2004 1:03:32 PM PST by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fideist
The real key is to see who Dubya "annoints" two years from now.

I'd rather we come up with a better way to determine who gets the nod. We really need to get a conservative in the WH in 2008. President Bush is good, but, at least from an government/federal standpoint, he is not a conservative, and many of those around him aren't either. We need somebody who is really going to work on the size of the federal government, and who is going to call Congress out on much of the pork it passes. I would like to think President Bush would, especially since we increased our lead in Congress, however I don't see that happening since many Republicans in Congress are not as conservative as they should be.

Before anybody gets the flamethrower out, I'm not saying President Bush is bad, he has done what he needed to do to get elected again, and this past election is the fourth time I've voted for him. I would just prefer somebody that would try to reverse the trends in government size and spending.
40 posted on 11/09/2004 1:25:53 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson