[robertpaulsen]

That's where analogies break down.

She had a prescription. I'm sure that explaining the situation to her doctor would have gotten her another. He probably could have phoned it in to another pharmacy that very same day.

Of course, she chose to make a capital case of the whole thing. There's tort money to be made here, after all!

Keeping a script and keeping a gun are miles apart. I'm surprised you made it an issue, Modernman.

[Modernman]

She had a prescription. I'm sure that explaining the situation to her doctor would have gotten her another. He probably could have phoned it in to another pharmacy that very same day.

That's not the point and you know it. Property is property. Just because it's not terribly inconvenient to replace a certain piece of property doesn't mean that others have the right to take it from you.

[Bella_Bru]

If you agree with the pharmacist for keeping the script because you believe that the possibility of an egg being released and fertilized (one of the hormones failing), then possibly not being implanted is a huge issue that must be looked at each and every waking second, why don't you just say so?

In a way, this being brought into court is a good thing. People found out about this and can decide with their wallets if they want to give the pharmacy in WI anymore business.