Skip to comments.
OU partner benefits won't be for heteros
Athens NEWS ^
| 2004-07-08
| Jim Phillips
Posted on 11/09/2004 6:41:30 AM PST by Time is now
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Bypassing the will of the people with public funds...
To: Time is now
the policy could expose the university to litigation by straight employees... Bingo.
2
posted on
11/09/2004 6:43:39 AM PST
by
Grim
To: Time is now
I figured no way would it be that other OU.
3
posted on
11/09/2004 6:44:11 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: Time is now
They will be sued and they will lose. They can't discriminate.
4
posted on
11/09/2004 6:44:55 AM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: Time is now
My fiance works for a non-public company - and they have the same policy. Same sex couples can have domestic partnerships for benefits, hetero couples cannot. It's really discriminatory for us.
5
posted on
11/09/2004 6:45:18 AM PST
by
arizonarachel
(Prayer works!)
To: Time is now
Time for some people to get some lawyers and break this schools health care policy!!! Make it an object lesson!
6
posted on
11/09/2004 6:48:35 AM PST
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: arizonarachel
so why doesn't someone sue? that's how the gay agenda got this far. why not fight back ?
7
posted on
11/09/2004 6:48:42 AM PST
by
stompk
To: Time is now
LOL!!!
Sodomites vs. fornicators - this is the wedge that will split the Democratic party.
8
posted on
11/09/2004 6:53:16 AM PST
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: Time is now
"This is a matter of economic fairness."No. This is a matter of politically correct college administrators sinking farther into the quagmire of "fairness." There are not enough Clinton-Carter judges in the country to make this idiocy stick. Although they will surely try ...
9
posted on
11/09/2004 6:55:32 AM PST
by
catpuppy
(John Kerry: He said he'd bring us together and he did. Thanks from the red states.)
To: stompk
I'm not going to sue over something like that - but I'm sure it'll happen at some point. It is frustrating, though.
To: Time is now
A heterosexual couple living together without benefit of clergy needs to sue the crap out of these Leftists for discrimination.
11
posted on
11/09/2004 6:56:49 AM PST
by
Malleus Dei
("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
To: stompk
The gay agenda has gotten this far because no one will stand up to it. After the last election, the time to stand up is NOW.
12
posted on
11/09/2004 6:57:58 AM PST
by
Malleus Dei
("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
To: Time is now
Those unmarrieds who are living together should get married.
13
posted on
11/09/2004 6:58:26 AM PST
by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
To: Time is now
OK. Bob decides to put Paul on his work health insurance as his partner. Paul has medical work done. Then Bob dumps Paul and adds Stan to his medical insurance. What happens to Paul's medical bills?
14
posted on
11/09/2004 6:59:02 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: catpuppy
Yet another stupid PC policy that cannot withstand even cursory analysis.
15
posted on
11/09/2004 6:59:08 AM PST
by
EA_Man
To: Grim
Nothing new. This is true of every DU regulation I have seen. In Califorinia, they get the benefits of marriage and can still file "Single" on tax returns and pay less tax than married couples.
To: Time is now
I'm certain the ACLU will be eager to enter the fray to ensure that all parties rights (Hetero, unmarried couples and Gay, unmarried couples) are protected - NOT!
17
posted on
11/09/2004 7:03:40 AM PST
by
drt1
To: AppyPappy
OK. Bob decides to put Paul on his work health insurance as his partner. Paul has medical work done. Then Bob dumps Paul and adds Stan to his medical insurance. What happens to Paul's medical bills? Well, I'm not a lawyer, but, obviously, Paul's bills incurred during his coverage period will be covered.
To: SedVictaCatoni
But what about afterwards? With married people, I think there is a period during the separation that spouses are covered.
19
posted on
11/09/2004 7:12:00 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: Time is now
Time to sue the university officials in civil court.
20
posted on
11/09/2004 7:18:14 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(FNC/ABCNNBCBS & the MSM fishwraps are the Rathering Fraudcasters of America!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson