[Socrates1]

It's like some bizarro chess game to them. Their purpose is clearly to constantly keep trying to put us in check, so that no matter move we make, it is wrong.

They say elections can't proceed without stability, and tell us that we can't enforce stability.

Clearly logical coherence is not required in their little transparent chess game.

Someone (e.g. the Media?) should always make them defend & explain the statements they make, in order to force the obvious paradoxical conclusions.

Checkmate

[cake_crumb]

"They say elections can't proceed without stability, and tell us that we can't enforce stability."

(For clarification to lurkers)

Paradoxically, stability throughout the world is antithetical to the UN, because its purpose would then be served and it's constantantly growing population of employees wuold suddenly be without jobs. We all know that UN employees, like terrorists, are too lazy ever to become PRODUCTIVE members of society. Therefore it's in Kohfi & Company's best interests to promote instability