Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Joanne Mariner is a FindLaw columnist and human rights attorney.

-humans in the womb have rights too?

1 posted on 11/08/2004 2:19:50 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DBeers

From: http://www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/justices/scalia.htm

[Scalia] During oral argument, Scalia is noted for his sarcastic, witty, intellectually demanding and occasionally biting comments and questions. He loves the cut and thrust of debate. He is both a colorful and incisive writer of opinions, and one whose candid and rhetorically combative statements may offend others, including his fellow Justices of all political persuasions. He is very intelligent and very opinionated, a combination that soothes those who agree with his views and which is troublesome to those who disagree with his views."

For these and many other reasons, I LOVE Scalia and I hope he will be appointed CJ. He has strong intellectual skills, and aboveall he has got an "originalist" (and conservative) view of interpretation.

SCALIA FOR CJ, NOW!!!


2 posted on 11/08/2004 2:28:31 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers

"Extremist" = anyone leftists oppose. As for the author, has someone tested her to see if she has an extra X chromosome?


3 posted on 11/08/2004 2:36:49 AM PST by peyton randolph (Time for Bush to pack the U.S. Supremes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers

Gee, if if weren't for abortion, just think about how many potential democratic voters there would be.


4 posted on 11/08/2004 2:37:07 AM PST by MSU49240
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers
The Scalia Court (Gag Alert!!!)

Is that one level below or above a Barf Alert?

5 posted on 11/08/2004 2:37:35 AM PST by beyond the sea (ab9usa4uandme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers
Innocent defendants would face criminal incarceration or long-term detention as due process rights would be eliminated

Yeh........ sure. Ashcroft has been working for Hitler, and it's going to get worse. (Barf Alert)

6 posted on 11/08/2004 2:41:33 AM PST by beyond the sea (ab9usa4uandme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers

"humans in the womb have rights too?"

Not according to the left.

I already have my pick for Sanda Day O'Connor's replacement.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/jun04/239180.asp

Kohl & Feingold are both on the Judiciary Committee & they wanted to give Doyle the opportunity to name her far left replacement on Wisconsin's Supreme Court, so they both supported her rise to the 7th Court of Appeals.


7 posted on 11/08/2004 2:42:24 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers
Women would face death or permanent injury by getting back-alley abortions.

Good reasons to go ahead and give birth.
8 posted on 11/08/2004 2:45:02 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Pingpingping!

Gotta love that backhand for Clarence Thomas!

10 posted on 11/08/2004 2:50:33 AM PST by Rose in RoseBear (HHD [... I want to see Anita Hill again ...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scripter; little jeremiah

This is where the rubber meets the road folks!
Scalia sounds like a winner to me.


11 posted on 11/08/2004 3:07:07 AM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (The reason the "youth vote" failed for democrats: 30 years of abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers

This is a great way to start the week! They are scared! This truly makes my day! Thanks!!!


12 posted on 11/08/2004 3:37:20 AM PST by BlazenGold ("Freedom Is Never Free" Bush 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
While Thomas would be an unlikely choice for chief justice -- he's not an intellectual leader, to put it mildly -- many believe Scalia is the man to beat for the job.

Can you say "backhanded liberal insult?"

 

Double-barrelled Mega-PING! to both lists! If you want on, FReepmail me!

13 posted on 11/08/2004 4:07:26 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers

This is great news! The thought of A Scalia/Thomas Court makes my day A+ ;)

I love to see them wallow in their ignorance and whine like babies. It won't change the fact that Bush won and we are so fortunate that Bush will make appointments. May God bless Bush and the court. We need men/women who will not make laws according to their own political agendas.


14 posted on 11/08/2004 4:45:19 AM PST by GodBlessUSA (Support, Prayers and Thanks to our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
That website - the one linked to that contains the original on-line editorial - has a message board where you can sound off about what was written. Anyone up for some trolling?
16 posted on 11/08/2004 5:07:33 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (We now rejoin the regularly scheduled legacy building, already in progress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBeers
Scalia is not a moderate conservative, or even a disagreeable but tolerable conservative; he is an extremist.

This statement shows the writer as being so far left, HE is the extremist.

17 posted on 11/08/2004 5:26:15 AM PST by jeffc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson