Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor .. party of 1 - Schwarzenegger supports GOP when it furthers his agenda, Republicans say.
OC Register ^ | 11/7/04 | Jim Hinch and John Gittelsohn

Posted on 11/07/2004 9:48:11 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger burst into the Mexican restaurant to a round of applause. Behind him trailed Stockton Mayor Gary Podesto, the ostensible star of this campaign event. But voters only had eyes for Schwarzenegger.

As the governor wove through the Vacaville eatery, he tried to turn the spotlight on Podesto, who was running a hard-fought race for state Senate. At one point, he grabbed Podesto's leaflets and began handing them to customers himself. But they only handed them back with a pen for autographs.

Just before roaring off in his black Ford Excursion, he gripped Podesto's shoulders and said: "I hope to see you in Sacramento."

A week later, Podesto - along with every single other Republican Schwarzenegger backed to unseat a legislative Democrat - lost. And Republicans learned that Schwarzenegger is not going to lead their party to political dominance in California.

It was just a year ago that Republicans, fresh from Schwarzenegger's win in a historic recall, were predicting a revolution in their party's fortunes. Gone, they said, were the days of irrelevance in Democrat-dominated California, where in 2002 Republicans lost every statewide race they ran in.

But as the lunch crowd in Vacaville intuitively grasped, Schwarzenegger is eclipsing, not elevating, his party.

As he zoomed around California in the election's final days, popping into restaurants, intoning on the radio and pumping up rallies, it became clear whose agenda Schwarzenegger was promoting: His own.

As he put it at a post-election news conference: "I will create the theme of which way we are going to go in this state. It will be me, from this office here. And the Republicans have to support me and the Democrats have to support me."

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: agenda; calgov2002; califonria; furthers; governor; newmajority; party; republicans; schwarzenegger; supports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2004 9:48:13 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The guy's pure ambition. Nothing wrong with that.


2 posted on 11/07/2004 9:49:50 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

As he put it at a post-election news conference: "I will create the theme of which way we are going to go in this state. It will be me, from this office here. And the Republicans have to support me and the Democrats have to support me."


"My relationship to power and authority is that I'm all for it.

People need somebody to watch over them.

Ninety-five percent of the people in the world need to be told what to do and how to behave."

Arnold S. in a 1990 interview with U.S. News

3 posted on 11/07/2004 9:49:52 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

some ther snips from the article..

"I was not elected and sent to Sacramento by the people of California to represent the Republican party," Schwarzenegger recently told a radio interviewer. "I was elected to be the people's governor. ... It's an ideological situation where I sometimes am, you know, have a different point of view than the party itself has."

He has raised no taxes and promotes big business. But he also made almost no permanent cuts to the budget, borrowed heavily, signed some tough environmental bills and recently selected a new finance chief who once advocated letting communities give heroin to drug addicts.

4 posted on 11/07/2004 9:52:15 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What? Self optimizing is now bad? Good for Arnold.


5 posted on 11/07/2004 9:52:54 AM PST by Drango (NPR- When government funds a "news" outlet that has a bias...it's no longer news...it's propaganda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
"The guy's pure ambition. Nothing wrong with that.

Clinton was pure ambition also, and there is definately something with that. Bush won because he is a principled man that is couched firmly in his beliefs and allows that to translate to his politics. Not because he is couched firmly in politics to guide his principles.

Governor T2 and Rudy G. do a disservice to the GOP going forward. The GOP won because of at least a small decorum and semblence of values were on display. The experiment of "compassionate conservatives" is a losing proposition in the long run.

CYB
6 posted on 11/07/2004 10:00:44 AM PST by ConYoungBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The guy's pure ambition. Nothing wrong with that.

Really? What if his ambition consists of gun control, special rights for homosexuals, wasting taxpayer dollars on ill-advised big-government borrowing schemes?

Anyhting wrong with that?

7 posted on 11/07/2004 10:06:51 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

We in CA better wake up. Arnold is not a good Gov. He is NOT a republican, and he is full of it when he says he doesn't owe the party anything. He owes the people of the party all, otherwise he wouldn't be in office. He had a duty to help Jones and Podesta win and he did nothing. He also had to be dragged reluctantly to help Bush. He thinks we can't think for ourselves and also, think about this, we just saw what celebrities are like, we rejected them in the Dems party why would we embrace this guy just because he is an actor. He is no Ron Reagan either.


8 posted on 11/07/2004 10:07:32 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Republican leaders?

WHAT REPUBLICAN LEADERS? ROTFLMAO You mean somebody actually found someone claiming to be a California republican leader? Where's the imperical evidence of this?

The idea that Schwarzenegger was going to swing this state to the right, was ludacrist. He's not a right-leaning individual himself. And of course this must be big news to those 'republican leaders'.

Schwarzenegger is only preferable if he is running against the likes of Bustamante or a Hillary Clinton. What should scare the bajeebers our of us all, is a 2008 scenario that see him running against Hillary.

If that happens, I recommend 90% plus of Republicans just stay home. There's not a chance in hell that sees me voting for Schwarzenegger for president of the United States.


9 posted on 11/07/2004 10:40:19 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I like you more and more all the time. Don't tell anyone, ok?


10 posted on 11/07/2004 12:32:58 PM PST by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

Your secret is save with me. Heh heh heh...


11 posted on 11/07/2004 12:40:49 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The idea that Schwarzenegger was going to swing this state to the right, was ludicrous.

Please tell me you're simply ill and tomorrow, when you're feeling better, you'll return to the Austrian camp.

12 posted on 11/07/2004 3:35:13 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Well Dan you can always vote the candidate of the Democrat party against Arnold instead and make your vote count.


13 posted on 11/07/2004 3:37:18 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Quit injecting logic into the mix...

Your like a rain on a wedding day...


14 posted on 11/07/2004 3:41:32 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Fine, don't like Arnold? Recall him and get Gray Davis back in there. That will really further the Republican agenda.


15 posted on 11/07/2004 3:44:39 PM PST by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity

Good to see you again DW. Still have a couple of your stickers on the wall of my garage :-)


16 posted on 11/07/2004 5:36:29 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Well Dan you can always vote the candidate of the Democrat party against Arnold instead and make your vote count.

Actually I was happy to vote for one of the best conservatives I have had the pleasure of knowing when Arnold ran. No need to vote for a Dem.

It is the mentality that we must take whatever liberal crap is shoved down our throats by liberal Republicans that has destroyed much of the once motivated Republican base in this country.

How about this, we all quit voting for gun grabbing, tax and spend, enviro-whacko liberals no matter what they have checked on their voter registration cards?

17 posted on 11/07/2004 5:52:11 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

Heh heh heh... well I've never actually been in the Austrian camp. I've tried to be a realist concerning the situation. When it comes to slamming him for stuff he hasn't done yet, I've defended him. When he does stuff like the land grab reserve, I've thought he was an idiot and said so.


18 posted on 11/07/2004 7:06:20 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
A week later, Podesto - along with every single other Republican Schwarzenegger backed to unseat a legislative Democrat - lost. And Republicans learned that Schwarzenegger is not going to lead their party to political dominance in California.

No surprise there!

19 posted on 11/07/2004 7:09:30 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Look, I didn't like Kerry because he was a self-involved jerk. Arnold is the same way. It doesn't matter what party they are from, self-invloved jerks stand for nobody's interests but their own. There is no need to change the constitution for this a**hole but I could have told you that right after I read his Oui Magazine interview in 1977 and I was only 14 then.


20 posted on 11/07/2004 7:13:01 PM PST by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson