Posted on 11/07/2004 6:50:28 AM PST by conservativecorner
Psst. Hey, buddy, wanna hear a secret? President Bush won the election. Big-time. Pass it on. Desperate times call for desperate measures, so we may soon need to send out smoke signals or bang on jungle drums to spread the news. Somehow, we've got to get the word out to John Kerry supporters that their guy isn't going to be President.
They seemed to have missed the election returns. How else to explain the avalanche of puzzling demands that Bush move leftward so the polarized nation can "heal" and "come together"?
Even before all the votes were counted, dire warnings poured forth from pundits and pulpits that Bush must abandon his agenda and principles. It seems too many Americans are so upset over his win that he must become the nanny-in-chief. Or they're just gonna cry and be really, really mad.
The usual suspects, left-leaning media and Democratic-affiliated groups who daily demonized Bush, are also suddenly concerned about the President's legacy. Why, he'll go down in history as the great divider if he doesn't move to their idea of the middle!
Color me confused. I thought elections were about winning and losing. You know, the old-fashioned idea that you put forth your plans and promises, the other guy does the same - then the voters decide which one to hire. The winner gets the job and the right to carry on with his plans. Indeed, he has an obligation to, since that's what he promised. The loser licks his wounds and accepts the verdict.
Apparently, I'm mistaken. To judge from the blasts of blather, Bush is now obligated to give Kerry supporters exactly what Kerry promised them. Kerry said he would work with allies before making decisions about terror and would appoint judges The New York Times approved of and would raise taxes on the rich, so Bush better do all that or else. And, most important, the openly religious Americans the Democrats despise should be sent to the back of the bus.
Extra, extra! Here's real news: Elections matter. That's why we have them. Bush won. Get over it.
The President, to his credit, said he would work to mend the nation's wounds by working with those who voted for Kerry. But he also made it clear he earned "political capital" and that "I intend to spend it."
"When you win, there is a feeling the people have spoken and embraced your point of view," he said.
Pretty articulate for such a dumb guy, huh?
Although Bush correctly draws the distinction between reconciliation and capitulation, it will be lost on those who sit on the other side of the culture divide. The left, especially the press, likes mushy leaders who will compromise on anything if only the wailing is loud enough. Bush clearly ain't their kind of guy, even though a majority of Americans voted for him.
That makes their demands all the more ridiculous. Especially when they come from people who bear much of the responsibility for the rancid tone of the campaign in the first place. Did any of those now warning Bush tell Kerry to stop calling him a liar about Iraq? Did they tell Michael Moore or Howard Dean to shove it?
Of course not. They encouraged the low road, thinking it would fire up the Democratic base.
There is a way for the losing side to get back into the game. Bush has already said he would work with those who share his goals - whether it's defeating terror or fixing Social Security. Those are good starting points for all Americans who care about their country.
There's something else the Bush bashers can do. They can study the election returns and spend time listening to ordinary Bush supporters about why they voted for him.
And they can ask what Democrats, having lost five of the last seven White House races, can do to connect with the heart of America.
Or they can just keep banging their heads against the wall, hoping the wall wises up.
Originally published on November 7, 2004
Michael Goodwin has some advice for those who opposed Bush and now want him to enact their agenda rather than his own.
Even before all the votes were counted, dire warnings poured forth from pundits and pulpits that Bush must abandon his agenda and principles. It seems too many Americans are so upset over his win that he must become the nanny-in-chief. Or they're just gonna cry and be really, really mad.
The usual suspects, left-leaning media and Democratic-affiliated groups who daily demonized Bush, are also suddenly concerned about the President's legacy. Why, he'll go down in history as the great divider if he doesn't move to their idea of the middle!
Color me confused. I thought elections were about winning and losing. You know, the old-fashioned idea that you put forth your plans and promises, the other guy does the same - then the voters decide which one to hire. The winner gets the job and the right to carry on with his plans. Indeed, he has an obligation to, since that's what he promised. The loser licks his wounds and accepts the verdict.
Apparently, I'm mistaken. To judge from the blasts of blather, Bush is now obligated to give Kerry supporters exactly what Kerry promised them. Kerry said he would work with allies before making decisions about terror and would appoint judges The New York Times approved of and would raise taxes on the rich, so Bush better do all that or else. And, most important, the openly religious Americans the Democrats despise should be sent to the back of the bus.
Extra, extra! Here's real news: Elections matter. That's why we have them. Bush won. Get over it.
Liberals always seem to define conciliation as Republicans doing what they want. Being hardnosed and arrogant is when Republicans do what they want. Being principled is when Democrats do what they want. If you can interpret this, you'll know how much value to put on calls for Bush to be conciliatory to the Democrats now.
Let them keep bashing their heads against the wall!!! It makes for great entertainment and we are the only ones who know the wall won't move!!!
Great oped.
Yeah, what he said! This article pretty much sums up my opinion.
Rush POUNDED this concept (or at least tried) into the thick skull of a lib caller 'Claire' on Friday. It was fun, Rush was dead on and the caller was clueless (an educator).
I would love to see President Bush aggressively pursue a conservative agenda especially in the areas of tax reform and social security. During the last term whenever Dubya extended his hand in a gesture of good will, some scoundrel like Kennedy bit it. Screw all Dems, they played dirty now it's time to hit them back harder and make them like it.
Yes, I caught that one. Poor Claire could only be an "educator," because she sure as hell is no "teacher." It sounded to me as if her only concern was to soothe the feelings of homosexual teenagers.
This plays well into my belief (since the 2000 election) that the biggest oxymoron website is MoveOn.org, simply because they can't...
Wow! Even W must stand in slack-jawed amazement at this statement.
Your meaning is clear, but you have mangled the language to a greater degree than anyone thought possible.
Now lets get on with doing it.
Ask the Kerry supporters about "one man, one vote" and they were all for it before the election. Now that they have lost, the refrain becomes "you have to take our feelings into account". Well, we did. And we rejected them.
bump .... might use graphic later.
This is an excellent column. Outstanding!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.