Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Max Combined
Apparently, this was all one-sided. The saintly Mexicans never misbehaved or mistreated any Texans. The Rangers were just brutal for no reason. I guess.

I'm so glad we're looking at history in an objective way now.

4 posted on 11/07/2004 5:36:51 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

It's the left's agenda of deconstructing American history.

Why don't they spend their time deconstructing the failures of liberalism and communism?


5 posted on 11/07/2004 5:38:35 AM PST by IStillBelieve (G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular vote victory in history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
The Comanche's and Mexican Bandits were not Saints Ether. both sides played pretty rough

Following the Civil War, a Union officer traveling through the Comancheria of northwest Texas found less people living there than he found long before the war. That didn't change until 1874 when the last Comanche band was forced onto the Fort Sill reservation. Yep, there were good reasons the Rangers played rough, then and later.

Some say, with good reason, the old Rangers need to be resurrcted and placed on the border to clean out the smugglers and drug dealers in South Texas. Yep, bring back William Warren Sterling!

22 posted on 11/07/2004 5:52:48 AM PST by Racehorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson