We can all be against late abortion - and none more so than the woman who feels the child kicking inside her - but the best way to reduce the number of such terminations is through earlier abortions
It boils down to a crying shame.
In Friday's New York Times, Kerry speechwriter, Andrei Cherny, wrote: 'The overarching problem Democrats have today is the lack of a clear sense of what the party stands for.'
They are typical liberals and simply cannot believe that their messsage could possible be rejected if they just screamed it loudly enough. Ultimately that leads to the self-righteous, smarmy, self-superior liberals deciding that the people are like your Alzheimer's grandmother and since the people are not smart enough to make the "right" decisions, i.e. give liberals power to run our lives, then they will simply TAKE it.
Now ain't that cute. "I think I'd prefer..."
That'd be fine, but what if God is real...and that ain't what you'd prefer. There is a force greater than you (we prefer, of course).
God and Jesus...tell us what we might do to be obedient.
Our love is yours...You are love, where else might it come from?
"To ban them is simply to make them more dangerous, because women will seek - whatever we think about it - to control their own situations." Abortion is 100% fatal to half the humans going to the serial killer for a 'cure'. Defending the slaughter of alive unborn children in the name of protecting women is a flawed premise on the face of it, PLUS the fact that society in general has allowed those defending the slaughter to have the greater vocie, women have little moral backdrop within which to decide for life over serial killing. The author loaded the premise to support a specific perspective ... he likes for women to have unfettered (ungodly) access to serial killers.