Posted on 11/06/2004 12:31:06 PM PST by NormsRevenge
SAN DIEGO (AP) - Flying low over the Sonoran Desert, Border Patrol agents spotted a skeleton sprawled in the brush.
The harsh terrain just inside Arizona is a busy trafficking corridor for illegal immigrants; the person could have died while trying to sneak into the United States. But busy Interstate 8 runs nearby - the person could have been a slain U.S. citizen, a suicide, a runaway.
The Border Patrol is grappling with just how to count the dead found along the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border. "It's rarely a cut-and-dry decision," said Joe Brigman, spokesman for Yuma Border Patrol. "In some cases, you just don't know."
Clues and documents found on the body east of Yuma let agents conclude the victim was indeed an immigrant - among 325 the Border Patrol counted in the fiscal year which ended Sept. 30, down from 340 the year before.
The agency says that its increased vigilance has helped reduce deaths among illegal immigrants.
Human rights activists say it's in the government's interest to keep that number low. They contend the agency tries to shave its count by excluding many skeletal remains, car-accident victims and bodies discovered by local law enforcement agencies.
Claudia Smith, a San Diego attorney with the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, says the ad hoc counting methods lack consistency from one government agency to the next - and even sometimes from one Border Patrol sector to another.
For instance, in Arizona, the busiest stretch for illegal entries, migrants died in record numbers for the third straight year in fiscal 2004. The Border Patrol reported 177 deaths, the highest death toll ever for a single state. But medical examiner's offices in Arizona put the toll even higher - about 221 deaths.
Andy Adame, spokesman for the Tucson Border Patrol sector, said local law enforcement agencies do not always notify the Border Patrol when they handle the death of a possible illegal immigrant.
Activists also blame the lack of a consistent tabulation strategy for the Border Patrol, which has 11,141 agents nationwide. Agents in Tucson, for instance, say they do not count the deaths of smugglers or guides.
"We count someone who is furthering their entry into the United States," Adame said in a telephone interview. "And we feel smugglers and guides are just going back and forth, so they aren't counted."
Border Patrol officials in Washington, D.C., however, say it has been standard policy to include smugglers since 1998, when the tracking began.
Smith contends the Border Patrol has a political interest in keeping the numbers low.
Last summer, the agency was embarrassed when the death toll increased despite high-profile efforts that included building rescue beacons in remote areas and launching an international campaign warning of the dangers of crossing through harsh terrain and dealing with smugglers.
This year, the U.S. government spent $13 million to fly deported immigrants into the Mexican interior in hopes of deterring them from attempting another crossing.
Smith, who has tracked migrant deaths for 10 years, wrote a letter in June to Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Robert Bonner, protesting the methodology that allows "dozens of migrant deaths a year (to) go uncounted by the Bureau."
She points to one notorious 2003 case - the deaths of 19 people found in a sweltering truck-trailer near Victoria, Texas. It was the deadliest immigrant-smuggling attempt in the United States in more than 15 years, but the numbers were not included in Border Patrol statistics, officials say, because they were found too far from the border.
The agency's count typically only includes people found in 43 U.S. counties that are within a 100-mile-wide belt along the border with Mexico.
That method also excluded 11 people whose bodies were found in October 2002 in a sealed rail car in Denison, Iowa, and three bodies found in a rail car near Baytown, Texas, in July 2003.
"The American people have the right to know the human cost, the real human cost, of these policies," Smith says.
Border Patrol officials bristle at the allegation they are undercounting deaths.
"We are very interested in knowing about any death discovered along the border," said Mario Villareal, a Washington-based spokesman for Customs and Border Protection. "But every death at the border shouldn't be assumed to be a migrant death."
If bodies of suspected migrants are found far inside U.S. territory, agents likely would record them internally but not in the official death toll, he said.
"Unfortunately, there are deaths that occur every day throughout the country," Villareal said. "Making a determination about a possible migrant death 200 or 300 miles from the border is outside our operational authority."
The agency also only counts deaths of migrants found on the U.S. side of the border. On the other hand, Mexico tracks fatalities on either side of the line, but only those of Mexican nationals. Migrants who are from other countries, or whose national origin is uncertain, are omitted from the count, according to Mexico's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
In 2004, it counted 286 such deaths. In each of the previous three years, Mexico's death toll was higher than the total kept by the Border Patrol.
"Each government maintains their own system," said Gloria Chavez, a Border Patrol spokeswoman. "There isn't a common methodology for tracking migrant deaths."
Some activists are calling for an independent agency to take charge of counting the dead.
"It's time for some other entity to do the demographics and homework on this," said the Rev. Robin Hoover, founder of Humane Borders, an organization that has set up water stations in the Sonoran desert for border crossers.
"We're entitled to know the human cost of these (border control) programs," Hoover said. "How can we possibly devise proper public policies if we don't even have an accurate body count?"
---
On the Web:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection: http://www.cbp.gov/
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation: http://www.crla.org/
Humane Borders: http://www.humaneborders.org/
"Activists" need a .357 between the eyes!
I'm gonna be really honest here...you may REALLY disagree with me but I agree, I think a more accurate death count is in order. Just as soon as our border patrol is given authority to SHOOT TO KILL.
Better death count? All of them.
If they would go to MEXICO and crackdown on the smugglers moving human cargo, they could nip this in the bud.
Anything else is just posturing and shielding illegal border crossings.
If the human rights activists want a better count they should get their butts out there and count themselves... and then they can talk and try to reason with the smugglers as they bring people across... The smugglers are the real human rights abusers...not our government...
yeah what you said! :)
Thing to always remember is that liberals are not honest in expressing their agenda.
They will criticize and show outrage to win people over on emotion. As such, they will not adopt logical solutions to problems.
I could cite many examples, one of which is condoms in schools. It isn't about preventing disease or pregnancy. It is about advancing the sex positive agenda (of which, the homosexual agenda is just a battering ram). Sex Positive proponents are opposed to abstinence not because "it doesn't work" or has a basis in morality, they oppose it because they say that it is unhealthy to deny sexual desires (see the similarity to the homosexual agenda?). The Sex Positives push for sexual activity at every age (not necessarily adult-minor relations although they do not oppose that; they hold no moral judgement even on beastiality, rape is the only physicial act they oppose although rape fantasies are okay).
Condoms in schools (in the interest of health safety) concedes the issue of teen sex (which is what the Sex Positives wanted). Do kids use condoms? Does it eliminate pregancy and disease? The condoms are there, did they solve the problem?
http://www.allaboutsex.org was one proponent site for Sex Positive teaching (which likely goes back to Kinsey). They have given up their site because of poltical pressure but retain a page that links to a number of other sites (several government run institutions).
] Simple.....I like it!
No, that would only decrease the problem slightly. Until the Mexican Government actively addresses the problem anything else is only an illusion.
You're a great American
The mexican government can be counted on to address bupkiss. They have decided to turn our welfare system into their welfare system.
The only way to decrease the problem in the long term is by removing the attraction. That means NO jobs for illegals, NO welfare or public aid for illegals, NO medical care for illegals, NO legal rights for illegals, and NO sympathy for illegals. A quick trip back home or a long time in jail (followed by a quick trip back home) is what they should expect in the U.S. Then they just might consider doing things legally, or at least stay at home and not get themselves killed. Remember, they are doing this to themselves.
Additionally, anyone who knowingly employs or aids and abets illegals should get the same treatment for creating an attractive nuisance in the first place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.