Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Arizona law sends fear through immigrant community
AP ^ | 11/5/4

Posted on 11/05/2004 4:09:40 PM PST by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: SmithL

This is the first mention I have seen or heard, of this great bill. I am not sure what we should make of that.


22 posted on 11/05/2004 4:45:15 PM PST by itsahoot (Sometimes the truth hurts, sometimes it makes a difference, but not often.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: BurbankKarl
...there will be some unemployed teachers....

Shouldn't be a problem with all of the new job openings when the illegals go back home.

24 posted on 11/05/2004 4:47:16 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How come none of the liberal losers say they want to go to Mexico? I hear Canada and franse, but never Messico. But the Messicans sure want to come here, don't they. What is it we are we doing wrong?


25 posted on 11/05/2004 4:50:27 PM PST by Aeronaut (This is no ordinary time. And George W. Bush is no ordinary leader." --George Pataki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Actually, there should be a Defend 200 fund opened up, so it will be ready when Mecha and the ACLU sues.


26 posted on 11/05/2004 4:50:33 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Californians viewing this thread can help institute a similar law by downloading petitions here. It is a pdf file. If your prefer, go to this page and request petitions via postal service.

It's easy to get a few signatures, people willingly listen to the briefest explanation and then say, "Where do I sign?" They want to sign.

27 posted on 11/05/2004 4:52:17 PM PST by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl


Exactly, and let me add "La Raza."

This is a fabulous law.
I know it was well reasearched and
scrutinized for legalities, but an
appointed for life, Federal judge
can strike it down at will.


28 posted on 11/05/2004 4:53:55 PM PST by onyx (John "F" Kerry deserves to be the final casualty of the Vietnam War - Re-elect Bush/Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
National Council of La Raza.

Translation:
National Council of "The Race".

29 posted on 11/05/2004 4:56:53 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A nice balanced piece from SF Gate.
</sarcasm>
30 posted on 11/05/2004 5:02:08 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge (A proud member of the self-preservation society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; HangFire

Phoenix-area Head Start leaders said attendance dropped dramatically Wednesday as worried parents kept their children home from the federally funded preschool program. In one classroom, only two children showed up instead of the usual 20.

Rachael Schultz, spokeswoman for Maricopa County Human Services, which oversees Head Start centers, said Spanish-speaking teachers and staff members called parents to assure them their children are safe at school, and by Thursday, attendance returned to normal. Citizenship is not a requirement to be in the program.

In fact, statistically speaking, it seems like citizens don't need Head Start. Would they still be running the program for what, at least according to this article, appears to be 90% less interest? 

31 posted on 11/05/2004 5:10:19 PM PST by AnnaZ (See? God *does* listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

It will be a mite tougher than that. Severability is written into it. On the off chance a judge rules against a particular clause, the rest survive.

Post election research indicates about 47% of Hispanic Arizona voters actually voted for Prop 200. The La Raza and Mechista bunch are really grousing about that -- traitors, Tio Tacos, the usual slurs. That's somewhat lower than other big demographic groups, but support even crossed party lines.


32 posted on 11/05/2004 5:19:42 PM PST by JackelopeBreeder (Proud to be a mean-spirited and divisive loco gringo armed vigilante terrorist cucaracha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Happy days are here again!


33 posted on 11/05/2004 5:20:30 PM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ
Can anyone really have a problem with this? Has the word illegal lost its true meaning?

Yes. We were inundated with anti-prop 200 ads here. They were desperate to stop it. I won't be surprised if there's a court challenge.

34 posted on 11/05/2004 5:24:24 PM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder

Yeah, it's a really well written law.
It should stand judicial scruntiny,
but nothing can stop a Federal judge
if he/she so desires. They strike
it down part by part, and then what?


I love the fact that so many Latinos voted for it!
That alone must have the "destroy America by invasion
groups" madder than hell.


35 posted on 11/05/2004 5:25:17 PM PST by onyx (John "F" Kerry deserves to be the final casualty of the Vietnam War - Re-elect Bush/Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"Proposition 200 requires proof of citizenship when seeking some public benefits or when registering to vote."

How dare Americans try to protect their own!< /sarcasm >

36 posted on 11/05/2004 5:25:34 PM PST by sweetliberty (Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ
Proposition 200 requires proof of citizenship when seeking some public benefits or when registering to vote.

If they keep this kinda thing up I'll have to quit voting in Canada, Panama, and Botswana:-(

37 posted on 11/05/2004 5:29:59 PM PST by HangFire (Imagine a world with no hypothetical situations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Burlem
....(just thought I would throw that in)

Why?

What possessed you to "throw that in"? I don't appreciate your gratuitous swipe at President Bush.

38 posted on 11/05/2004 5:34:50 PM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flashman_at_the_charge
A nice balanced piece from SF Gate. Actually, neither the Chronicle, nor its site, SFGate.com, had anything to do with this story, other than acting as host for the Associated Press. The same AP story can be found at many other sites.
39 posted on 11/05/2004 5:43:04 PM PST by SmithL (Do I seem like I'm gloating?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: onyx

The ads against it started getting laughable at the end. They reminded me of Cheryl Mills saying "Impeaching Bill Clinton never fed a hungry child".

LOL


40 posted on 11/05/2004 5:45:53 PM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson