Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The passion that burned for Bush
CBS.MarketWatch.com ^ | Nov 5, 2004 | Jon Friedman

Posted on 11/05/2004 8:47:22 AM PST by Notwithstanding

If pop culture is a reflection of a nation's values, then the signs of a Bush victory were there a long time ago for anyone to see.

There've been two runaway box-office surprises this year: Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" and Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ."

The Bush political team intuitively understood the tone of the U.S. voters much better than the media did. To be honest, I still don't quite understand how certified media junkies like me could have been so wrong.

I read the New York Times (NYT: news, chart, profile) and the New Yorker religiously. I watch CNN (TWX: news, chart, profile) and the networks' evening news programs as well as the gabfests on Sunday mornings, too.

Go figure.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbs.marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; abortion; bush; bushwins; catholic; conservative; fahrenheit911; gibson; ilovemel; liberalsaskwhywhywhy; mel; melgibson; passion; pushpolls; redstates; religiousright; thepassion; w; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Notwithstanding
NYT, CNN, etc are NOT a reflection of the culture. They are a fiction of the cultural ELITE.

They are a fiction of the people who have appointed themselves the cultural elite.

Try reading the trash these people think is good literature, or watching any of the films or programs they think are sophisticated. Like their news shows, it's all just a repetition of tiresome cliches, hateful slogans, or juvenile vulgarity. I'm sick of hearing these people are the cultural elite: they're just a bunch of flotsam that's washed up on the docks of Manhattan or Malibu and hasn't yet been washed away.

21 posted on 11/05/2004 9:02:23 AM PST by FredZarguna (Ready now thy pajamas. For the Dark Queen begins to gather all evil things unto herself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
The lesson that the media should take away from the 2004 election is this: It's just as important to know all about who is voting for president as it is to know about who is running for president.

And they wonder why they're in last place. They're not just "voters". They're "news consumers" and they aren't consuming yours. HELLO! It's important for ANY BUSINESS to know all about WHO IS BUYING THEIR PRODUCT (or not buying it as the case may be).

22 posted on 11/05/2004 9:02:46 AM PST by Question Liberal Authority (THANK YOU, FREEPERS for re-electing President George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This guy just confirms my belief that stupidity should be a crime.

Unfortunately for them, (and fortunately for us), most of the 'cultural elite' in the world think all Americans are in complete agreement with the garbage spewed by the old media.

23 posted on 11/05/2004 9:03:15 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a 'legal entity'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding

The coastal elite all voted against bush, not for Kerry.


24 posted on 11/05/2004 9:04:06 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"I read the New York Times (NYT: news, chart, profile) and the New Yorker religiously. I watch CNN (TWX: news, chart, profile) and the networks' evening news programs as well ..."

You gotta read this one!

25 posted on 11/05/2004 9:04:30 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
I think she is being sarcastic. She is pointing out that the reason she missed everything about the election is precisely because she was reading only the Liberal sources.

Judging by the whole article, I have to disagree. I don't think the writer really has the capacity for satire or irony. It's just a regurgitation of her prejudices. Later, she even asks how her anointed media outlets could possibly have "missed this big story" and let her down so badly.

26 posted on 11/05/2004 9:06:09 AM PST by FredZarguna (Ready now thy pajamas. For the Dark Queen begins to gather all evil things unto herself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pete
I think she is being sarcastic. She is pointing out that the reason she missed everything about the election is precisely because she was reading only the Liberal sources.

I believe you are correct. I think it will pass most New Yorker over, however. She needs to be a little less subtle. If she had referenced the blogosphere and Free Republic as another view, her sarcasm would have been clear.

27 posted on 11/05/2004 9:06:58 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BrigidZ

Fahrenheit 911 made $113 million in the US and $99 million overseas.

Passion of the Christ made $ 370 million in the US and $ 239 million overseas.


28 posted on 11/05/2004 9:08:08 AM PST by Question Liberal Authority (THANK YOU, FREEPERS for re-electing President George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding

"To be honest, I still don't quite understand how certified media junkies like me could have been so wrong.

I read the New York Times (NYT: news, chart, profile) and the New Yorker religiously. I watch CNN (TWX: news, chart, profile) and the networks' evening news programs as well as the gabfests on Sunday mornings, too.

Go figure."

Is this a parody?


29 posted on 11/05/2004 9:08:39 AM PST by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

He was using sarcasm, right? C'mon, that had to be a joke, he couldn't have actually believed this.


30 posted on 11/05/2004 9:11:03 AM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScottM1968

There's still hope. Bush did 8 points better in urban areas than he did in 2000. In fact, he did better in 49 states (Vermont was the exception) and with almost every demographic group.

The author mentions Wal-Mart republicans. When Wal-Mart ran out of rural areas, they started creeping into the cities.


31 posted on 11/05/2004 9:11:19 AM PST by Question Liberal Authority (THANK YOU, FREEPERS for re-electing President George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding

What they really can't beleive is that the majority of people do not agree with them!


32 posted on 11/05/2004 9:13:01 AM PST by bigbob (2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
"...I read the New York Times (NYT: news, chart, profile) and the New Yorker religiously. I watch CNN (TWX: news, chart, profile) and the networks' evening news programs as well as the gabfests on Sunday mornings, too..."

Well, DUH! That's exactly why you are so out of touch DUMBO!

While you were all engrossed in pop culture, the rest of us were working our butts off, and paying taxes, and studying history...and understanding our COnstitution. I suggest that you take the time to read our Constitution and study it. Then decide if it is worth preserving. If you can't see that it is then you are a very evil person.

33 posted on 11/05/2004 9:28:04 AM PST by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

There's a chance he is being ironic? Here's to hoping...but it's a rare liberal who has that much sense of humor.


34 posted on 11/05/2004 10:03:00 AM PST by Mamzelle (Nov 3--Psalm One...Blessed is the man...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This is exactly what I had to encounter with my family. I am a New Yorker and I was raised as a Democrat. I had a hard time trying to convince my family to vote for President Bush. Liberals are in their on little world and believe me they are not as educated as they make themselves out to be. If anything they are the dummies who voted for Kerry.
35 posted on 11/05/2004 10:09:03 AM PST by NJBushcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
"The Bush political team intuitively understood the tone of the U.S. voters much better than the media did. To be honest, I still don't quite understand how certified media junkies like me could have been so wrong."

Here, allow me to fix this. It should read:

"The U.S. voters intuitively understood Bush much better than the media did. To be honest, I still don't quite understand how certified media junkies like me could have been so wrong about the importance of character."

There, all better now.

36 posted on 11/05/2004 10:32:45 AM PST by Titan Magroyne (Cha! I am so not an aggressive driver! Call me pro-active.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; ...
Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING
The Bush political team intuitively understood the tone of the U.S. voters much better than the media did. To be honest, I still don't quite understand how certified media junkies like me could have been so wrong.

We have tuned out the MSM. Oh we may watch Dan Ratherbiased, Tom Brokjaw, Petah, and Sam Donaldson to see them spew and spin but we already know that we are hearing from Zogyists and being snowed.

To put it bluntly, the left believed their own B******T. When you cook the books on poll figures and ratings/circulation, be sure to keep a "real" copy in reserve to know how far you are off.

37 posted on 11/05/2004 11:46:45 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titan Magroyne

That's great!


38 posted on 11/05/2004 11:47:33 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ScottM1968; frog_jerk_2004; Question Liberal Authority

39 posted on 11/05/2004 11:53:03 AM PST by Liz (The man who establishes the reputation of rising at dawn, can sleep til noon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Thankya. :o)


40 posted on 11/05/2004 5:32:41 PM PST by Titan Magroyne (Cha! I am so not an aggressive driver! Call me pro-active.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson