Sheesh. Get a room already.
Where does Moon find these people?
Whitney was due to sing...
'I will always love you, and you, and you, and you, and you and you, and you too, and you, and you...'
What am I missing here?
Sheesh. Get a room already.
Why say it's a 'scheduling conflict?' Why not say 'I don't want to be associated with the freakin' MOONIES?'Marriage is between A man and A woman, not 360,000 of each who've never even seen each other before that. A travesty of marriage.
frickin moonies destroyed a family I lived near back in the 80's. It took them years to retrieve their son and daughter and get them back to their own lives.
Shame that Whitney Houston traded in her talent to be such a drug-addled loon. (Her publicist at least shook enough sense into her to get her to cancel this one.)
All the Democrats that I know consider the Moonies to be one of the major influences on the GOP. They point out the Washington Times and UPI connection. Helen Thomas left the UPI, claiming that Moon interferred with the reporting process there and at the Washington Times.
Why are you posting a 1997 article? Are you objecting to the fact of a mass ceremony, or the fact that the marriages were arranged? In principle I'm not seeing how either one should necessarily be outlawed.
A mass ceremony is just one officiator uniting many one man and one woman pairs into the institution of marriage. We have a history in this country and culture of people having double or triple wedding ceremonies. While the article describes an extreme of this, at the end of the day, it doesnt violate the principle of marriage being between one man and one woman.
Arranged marriages have a very ancient and respected history. In the history of the world, the notion of the two lovers being the sole deciders of whether they would marry is only a fairly recent aberration. I'm not saying arranged marriage is either a good thing or a bad thing, but I think it would be very difficult to outright outlaw it. If people wish to accept an arranged marriage, especially as in this case where it is most certainly by their own free will and not by blind custom, then it is hard for me to see how or why it should be outlawed.
If your objection is to Moon's religion and teaching, IMHO it is not a good precedent to outlaw a religion. Quite a number of years ago I was active in a conservative and prolife circles of a large city and there were some "Moonies" active in our group. I was amazed to find that these particular people shared many of the values of many Americans. They never tried to convert me. They were there to work on pro-life and conservative issues. I never looked further into Moon's teachings. My feeling was if there were some good citizens like this who loved America and her fundamental values, then they had a right to follow those teachings, however much I might disagree with them. All according to the Constitution that we revere.